Playing this for the first time

>playing this for the first time
>having a shitload of fun
>wow so many things to do, all the bosses have unique mechanics and so many interesting and secret easter eggs and moons to get
>come to Yas Forums
>everyone on here shits on this game and says its terrible

a-am I not allowed to have fun with this game?

Is it because i've never really seriously taken the time to play a mario game start to finish? (I grew up with Sony)

Attached: file.png (926x1500, 3.04M)

>a-am I not allowed to have fun with this game?
No one said this

Fuck the haters and just enjoy the game. I wish I can play it as well.

>everyone on here shits on this game and says its terrible
First of all, Yas Forums does it to any game.
Second, the legitimate criticism is that it has ups and downs, some areas are really good, other areas are kinda bad.
Mario himself controls wonderfully and has a huge range of movement and tricks he can do.
The levels don't always take full advantage of that.

All in all it's still a good game.
It's just that...it's no masterpiece.

Attached: 1311607120720.png (100x100, 3.17K)

The game's too easy and there isn't enough world's, it's that simple. Hopefully the SM64 Remake can fix that.

Attached: ZomboMeme 13042020100000.jpg (1080x1600, 259.6K)

It's a great game. I might fire it up again.

Here's the thing you'll find about ANYTHING online. Whether it's games/music/travel/hiking- basically.

Nobody ever comes online to tell how much of a good time they're having with anything, because they're either busy enjoying it, or they had a great time, so they don't need to talk about it, cause they've already validated their own opinion with the only one that matters- their own.

Whereas people who have a bad time with something love to come online and moan about it, because they need validation from other people that they didn't waste their time, and that other people consider it "objectively bad".

It's a pretty good game, just that the concept of criticizing more often than enough has good intentions. For Odyssey, it's more " How can we make this better? " than " This is utter shit "
All the 3D Marios are pretty good to great

There were a good number of moons that were way too simple or boring. Felt like sometimes it was too catering towards little kiddies. The controls and exploration were great but it was disappointing considering the "hype"

lurk more

I loved it when I played it. Then recently tried playing again and didn't have as much fun as before. It's a great game but I might be unable to enjoy a game I already finished before. Playing too many roguelikes/lites probably ruined me.

It's not that great compared to the other 3d mario games, it's a fun game on it's own right though.
It's only problems are that it doesnt have that many levels and it has too many filler moons.

Yas Forums has been shitting its pants in fits of impotent rage since the switch is a huge success and every single exclusive has been shitposted to death, there's not a single game that spergs here will praise don't pay attention

It's a very good game, but still a bit underwhelming for a "main" Mario game. The posses ability was never really that interesting - he might as well have found a new suit or power-up or something.

>everyone on here shits on this game and says its terrible
Only 3 kind of people do this:

>So(n)yggers that dont have any good 3D Jump and Run game
>Gamcube nostalgia faggots who praise only the games that came out on Gamecube(case in point Melee, Sunshine and Animal Crossing and Metroid)
>People who complain it isnt like 64 because big nostalgiagoggles

Its literally in the Top 3 of 3D Marios so far and nothing they say will change it.
Its a masterpiece in videogame history

>SM64 remake
why not just mario oddesey 2 instead?

>Its literally in the Top 3 of 3D Marios
true
>Its a masterpiece in videogame history
false

soooo, is it emulable yet?

I genuinely thought it was mediocre until I got to the castle and unlocked the 64 outfit then nostalgia goggles flooded my brain and I thought it was amazing. The power of nostalgia is pretty potent.

I enjoyed going for all the cube bonus moons after that. But I'd rank it alongside Galaxy 1+2.

64 > Sunshine > G1+3 = Odyssey > 3D World

Dude, come on, you know where you are.

Attached: 118.png (300x100, 33.68K)

It's objectively great and almost perfect, why would you care what some retards say?

Hint, though: There barely EVER was any talk about this game on Yas Forums, which should tip you off that it's good.

It's a great game, but you should absolutely try and play some other Mario games.
Also try a few Zelda titles. Yas Forums and the internet shits all over Skyward Sword, but it's actually awesome and people who complained about the controls are limp wristed onions simps.

I found it kinda boring, lost interest early on. I don't think Mario has its "magic" any more. Sunshine was such a disappointment and since then its been homogenization and simplification of design and mechanics. Tried Odyssey for a few hours but it never got to a point where it was actually enjoyable.

It kind of falls apart at the end because the majority of the content is postgame and the feeling of progression goes out the window.

It's a great game. I envy you that you get to experience it for the first time. Hoping for a sequel.

The controls are the least of Skyward Sword's problems

Don't listen to Snoy trannies, OP. They were duped into buying a console that's been out for 7 years and it still only has ONE (1) game.

It's a great game but it has 2 big flaws:
1) It's easy as fuck
2) Too many moons in too few levels.

A sequel like Galaxy 2 would be a masterpiece.

It's not "too easy" brainlet. There are a shitton of moons that vary from easy to hard to obtain. This is a design choice to give every type of player a good experience. Unskilled players can move forward with easier moons. Skilled players can challenge themselves with harder moons. Collecting every moon gives the game a flow that makes the game very enjoyable. You are a faggot too.

Can we get a galaxy remake on switch please, that would be dank

>Hint, though: There barely EVER was any talk about this game on Yas Forums, which should tip you off that it's good.
This man knows.

I don't really shit on the game, it's a good game for the target audience. I'm not part of that audience anymore, it just feels like a chore to play through.

too many moons that aren't interesting to get at all.
shit like the ground pound moons, talking to npc's that give you moons, moons in rocks, moons in very easy to reach areas are just boring.
it's a quantity > quality problem.

That's what most people whinge about. The sky and flying around is another, but people are whining about nothing, Skydiving in Skyward Sword is awesome, dungeons are largely good, boss fights are enjoyable except for the multitude you have to do the imprisoned and the overworlds are fine.
The only issues with Skyward sword is:
>Harp
the harp is garbage implementation. If it were playable like the Ocarina or Wind Waker, it'd be so much better
>The collection puzzles to get into the dungeon
They're just not really that fun. It's a little challenging, but really just not that interesting and doing it a million times isn't interesting.
Aside from that, I believe the game is pretty great.

The controls are a strawman. Most people complain about the games many other design flaws. Go watch the Matthewmatosis review or stop talking, because you're pushing a false narrative.

try Mario 64 and you'll see

This. The game is great, but it doesnt break into the "legendary" tier with mario 3, world, 64 and galaxy.
I loved the desert and the city worlds, but yeah, the OTHER ones felt a bit flat except for the beach, snow and final worlds, those are good too