Why are high budget turn based rpgs dead? Why can't people at least try to find enjoyment out of them?

Attached: 1568721894567.jpg (900x1050, 159.41K)

because faggots like this demands that every game must be dark souls from now on

Turn Based is fucking boring.

>non dexterious fags that can't handle the skills necessary for games like dark souls

Persona 5
Divinity OS 2

Most popular JRPG/WRPG of the last years, both turn based.

Broadening the net. Soon there will be no genres of games, there will only be one genre as companies desperately try to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Faggots couldn't just accept that some genres just aren't for them, as a result JRPG's are dying and being replaced with generic action games.

Dark Souls combat works for that style of RPG, a realistic, gritty, and mostly grounded medieval set world. It doesn't work very well for a High Fantasy setting or even something like a 3rd person shooter RPG.

Attached: header.jpg (460x215, 71.34K)

give me bloodborne but with magic

Trails
Yas Forums gets butthurt about it though
I just take it as proof that a bunch of tranny discord raiders and burnt out coomers who only play smash and loli futa sims hate it, therefore meaning that my taste is better than theirs ;)

Based and truthpilled

the developers are bad at making games

The argument I cannot stand the most is the whole definitions evolve over time thing for genres. The whole fucking point is to categorize games not for you to arbitrarily decide something belongs into somewhere else because you think it's cool or something. Sub genres are a thing for a reason too

Those are great AA games, not AAA. OP was talking about high budget, something with a huge production value and those, especially P5, are far from that.

If you're going to have a huge budget you should use it for real time combat which has much more mass appeal, turn based combat is just dated and niche now

if that were true than crystalis would have been the best thing since sliced bread and there wouldn't have been nearly as many turn based rpgs afterwards as there are

I'm not crazy right? That fight will give you omnislash even if you never unlocked it right? I remember arguing with buddies of mine about it back in like middle school.

What the hell does that even mean. They had excellent sells. Besides except from FFW and TES and Fallout they aren't any ongoing AAA rpg franchises.

>Like playing as an entire party
>"NOOOOO your games need to have you play as one dude babysitting a bunch of useless AI party members that will only ever do like 5% of the work at best!"
fuck arpg fags

Attached: buster cannon.jpg (500x680, 265.24K)

Persona 5 royal is the biggest rpg out this year
Pokemon has annual releases

I'm really salty about the Switch content not being DLC for the other platforms.

I hate this meme Dark Souls combat is simple literally Zelda tier

Can some explain what tripple AAA means? Like, where does it come from?

Relatively speaking, you don't need a high budget to make a turn-based game. For all the whinging people do about developers abandoning turn-based games, it feels more like people just wanted fancier graphics than the plethora of turn-based games that kept coming out when the genre was "dead".

Because retarded westerners can't just play patiently and strategically. They require constant, dumb stimulation like this fag If you want really good strategic turn-based, check out FF5. There also exists a mod for it that adds a bravely default-esque playstyle.

If you was talking about a fighting game yeah, but darksouls really nigga. That shit is slows af its requires patience not dexterity dumbass

>2000 +20
>Not playing soulsborne games
How does it feel to be a shitter?