Worth playing today?

like I said, zoomers get the cross and the 3rd game

2 is absolute garbage.

TW1 is the only GREAT game in the whole series.

>m-muh combat!
Yup, clearly zoomies know jack shit about ROLE playing.

Yes. Choose Siegfried's path in TW1 and Roche's path in TW2 for the most kino experience

Attached: People_Siegfried_full.png (240x240, 57.33K)

shut up Yas Forumstard

Worst out of the 3.
1>3>2
The combat is atrocious but looks amazing and the story is pretty good, absolutely worth a play.

shut up sc*ia'fag

Attached: Vernon Roche.webm (424x618, 2.17M)

Yes and yes.
Witcher 1 has an amazing narrative. Witcher 2 has a good story with nice gameplay.
Play both.

humans are cringe, elf pussy is better

2 and 3, terrible. Do not play.
1 EE is kino AF.

>W2 has nice gameplay
That shit was excruciating

The thing about Witcher 2 is that both options are the Yas Forums option.

can any other cardgame even compete with gwent's art and animations?

1 is the best in terms of allowing you to dominate an RPG system by learning it's intricacies and preparing well. It's story is good after an awful intro, has a fantastic conclusion that recontectualizes a lot of stuff that may not have seemed important at all to be mind-blowing

2 has the best narrative overall though, & really is the only of the 3 games where it feels like the world changes around you, & the only place in the series where your choices drastically effect how the game ends (though Witcher 3 does a bad job carrying over the date of the witches in 2, regardless of what you did in 2, 3 acts like sorcereress get the bad end

3 has worse RPG mechanics than 1 or 2 (perk slotting and the level of pigeonholing for builds is soul crushing, cool builds start NG+). The scale of the world is huge and the quests are more numerous but much more repetitive, leaning hard as you:be probably heard on 'witcher vision' to make questing basically an issue of tjist following the map and red lines on the ground. But the adventuring and wandering the land is what people always wanted the game's to capture, even if it is generic for an open world RPG it's really a big part of a part of the book DNA too and makes sense for Witcher beyond just being the genre-type flavor of the decade

Play them all. Just be sure to play W1 in the faux isometric camera, trying to play it OTS is clunky garbage and makes the combat trash.

>he was alvin the whole time bro!

3 is basically just GTA/RDR in a fantasy setting

yes

Attached: 171471859.jpg (480x300, 38.09K)

Yeah the series goads you into thinking scoiateail can be reasoned with, books clear that up real fast

There's really no plot point in any of the rest of the series that compares. Alvin is witcher's 'villain who believably thinks he's doing the right thing,' & having him base his world view not only against situations the player was there for & but HOW the player reacted is absolutely kino, even if CDPR had to cut 1/2 of his outcomes when most videogames have cardboard villains by comparison

I literally said that in my post. The reason I brought it up was because being a rando wanderer taking up meandering sidequests is how geralt functions in the books as well

2 is the best one, anyone who disagrees doesn't know shit about video games
>no iframes
>no rhythym game combat
>most focused in terms of scale
>branching paths actually matter
>have to prep for combat or you will get boned

2 is playable but 1 feels like ass