Why wasnt he in Witcher 3?
Why wasnt he in Witcher 3?
Other urls found in this thread:
Radovid probably cut his dick off
Too irrelevant, just like those who took his path
They wanted to put him in but couldn't fit him in time for release.
I always appreciated how players that choose the non-human path in the games always get absolutely shafted. You get Siegfried if you pick the Order for Witcher 2 but not Yaevinn if you picked the Scoia'tael. And you get Roche in Witcher 3 but not Iorveth. LOL fuck elves.
yet still they completeyl shafted based Siegfried in W3, reducing HIS order to mere bandits
shame
cut content, didn't finish it in time
Dat nigga dead. GLORY TO TEMERIA
Agreed, fuck those knife-earred shitters.
>Not playing the game twice to play each path
It's funny how i in accident chose him.
I immediately heard Kalkstein's words on would i rethink my choice.
Though Vergen as way comfier so never regretted it in the end.
youtube.com
I tried to play 2 with iorwerh path, but could never bring myself to do it when it came the time to decide the side
there is just no reason to pick him
He wasn't gay enough.
Even in Witcher 1 the order had fucked up elements. For example Count de Wett. It makes sense after Radovid disbands them some would turn to banditry.
Now if only Siegfried got to appear in Blood and Wine. He'd fit right in for the tournament.
>Play Witcher 1 and 2 in a perfection so i could all kinda cool choices and missed content in 3.
>Never get them because there were never any...
>Only get tattoo.....
Siegfried was based as fuck but he was kinda Barney in the Combine. It would have never worked out so it was better to just leave him.
>No one ever mentions the werewolf cop and hes story line or Thaler
I don't know why, but I fucking love Cynthia's face.
i went with roche because there was no reason not to since he saved you from prison and execution while the elf was just a dick who hates you. then i wondered if siding with roche was the reason letho gets away in the beginning of the game but when i retried and helped the dickhead elf the exact same thing played out. that's when i reloaded again and went with roche. i know it's popular to hate this game but i really enjoyed the story and people say i took the shit path so the other path must be really cool
You may think Vergen was comfier but it did not have
O D R I N
D
R
I
N
Thaler appears and actually has a pretty important role in one questline.
Vincent Meis was one of my favorite characters and I'm sad he is never even mentioned outside of getting a Gwent card.
It would've been perfect if they reconstructed more of Vizima in 3 and had quests in Nilfgaard-occupied Vizima.
I hate they never brought back any of the old characters from 1-2 except for Thaler.
>or Thaler
er...
but I agree about vincent, he was fucking cool. greasy old slack cop that turns out to be a good guy
you had lesbomancy and succubus fucking in Vergen. Alone that made it worthy and the Siege.
a hell of a lot more carries from 2 to 3 than does from 1 to 2. i'm pretty sure it's just the armor and some passive dialogue about whether you killed adda or not. maybe not even that
H E R E B O Y
E
R
E
B
O
Y
Feature creep. The game was already close to 200 hours, his presence alone would significantly change the final party composition.
fuck i gotta replay. twice. i want to kill henselt again
I wish W3 was more akin to W2 with all these intricate choices and shit. Alas most people don't replay games nowadays.
I mean it makes sense some of them would have business elsewhere and they wouldnt all conveniently be in the velen-novigrad region.
Especially considering many of these characters could potentially be dead... But they were fine ignoring the fact Geralt could've killed Thaler in the 1st game.
But seriously, we were robbed of the fucking golden opportunity that would've been having Ioverth, Roche and Letho having a conversation in Kaer Morhenn before battling the Wild Hunt.
Odrin is referenced plenty of times on random notice boards in 3. I didnt understand them until I went back and re-played 2. Now I cant get that shout of my head.
this. I don't know if it's the open map or the mediocre man story but Witcher 3 just doesn't have that many interesting zones or questlines. Nt including the DLCs there are just a handful or bigger side quests but that's it. everything is larger ins size but didn't leave that much of an impact on me.
yeah. so many of the W3 choice were clearly right vs wrong, and the only reason you'd take the "wrong" choice is if you were being deliberately edgy (sending keira to radovid, killing a sapient monster instead of making it clear out, etc.)
W2 was so much more interesting in that regard. and it wasn't just two bland morally ambiguous choices pasted in there so the game could say you were wrong no matter what you did, aka "the bioware," but they actually made sense and often had real, logical consequences
Tons of characters from 2 came back though.
that's the charm of it. I picked his side once just to see what I'd missed when going with roche.
he starts out as a total cunt with no redeeming features, but by the end of it you have a grudging respect for him. he's aggressive, nasty, and in some ways kind of stupid, but you also get to see that he has positive characteristics and that he is genuinely trying to improve the world
seriously, try the iorveth path. I was convinced I wouldn't like it either when I started
had to remove all the good stuff the games build up to focus on muh ciri
I liked ciri and even the sections where you play as her. I think that could've been done fine. the problem was the wild hunt, which was utterly uninteresting and took up way too much time. if ciri's conflict had been with something else, with interesting characters who had complex motivations and stuff, it could've worked. but I guess that wouldn't be the witcher anymore