Which one is better Yas Forums?

Origins less bloat and mory story driven.

Odyssey is bloatmaxxed but there is something to the meditterean settings. Be mindful after some hours you can see everything is copy pasted.

Play as Kassandra since canon, Alexios is fake and gay

Attached: 1467372590180.jpg (1280x1280, 435.42K)

Both dads didn't want him. Which makes it so much worse.

Consider I'm not really subjected to leveling or repetitive shit; playing on PC I can teleport around, double the game speed during horse travel and make 4/8/16 times the amount of exp for any given action, fixing the horrendous pacing and skipping the awful fetch quests altogether

Origins just because Odyssey is a 12 hour game stuck in a 80 hour game's body, the only reason I stuck through it was because ancient Greece is the shit.

>because ancient Greece is the shit.
AC really do hook you with the setting of their games, gotta admit its always pretty solid.

Origins. Story is better, character is better, you actually assassinate people who have characters and have ideological arguments with them, the exploration has more unique areas compared to Odyssey which literally reuses cave and tomb design ad nauseum let alone camps and barracks everywhere, the world of Origins is at least alive compared to Odyssey where only Athens and Sparta really feel like they have anyone living or working there, and Aya's ship feels immensely more fun to control than the Adrestia I can't even begin to describe. The cannons alone make the combat not feel like a chore.

Odyssey has better gameplay in terms of actual fighting, but it fails everywhere else. You will also be forced into a build and far more grinding than Origins ever asks of you on top of making two of the options exceedingly gimped unless you have a specific build for them (Hunter and Assassin specifically) whereas Bayek is a jack-of-all-trades that can handle every situation and you're only asked to equip new primary weapons and bows every once in a while while upgrading some side equips that are always on you with commonly found material to make you stronger.

Origins also has better DLC in my opinion but that could easily be argued since LotFB and TFoA are both still pretty decent, I just found the Afterlifes in Origins far more visually appealing with more unique enemies and much more enjoyable exploration than what Odyssey offered.

Attached: Assassin's Creed® Origins 2019-10-03 05-05-59.jpg (1920x1080, 1.14M)

>grinding
>assassins creed
lol no

Origins for the """story""" and gameplay, Odyssey to play as greased-up Kassandra, although they're similar gameplay wise. The anons saying Odyssey is copy-pasted are correct, and it worked to the games detriment. A smaller, more detailed world, such as Origins kind of, allows for more uniqueness.

I'm interested to see the direction the go next. I heard some Viking shit? Rome would be cool. Sadly, they'll never capture the sailing of Black Flag, so keep that in mind.

hold up
there's actually an AC where you play as a 100% nigger?
LMAO

Alexios fits for Deimos better.

Attached: crop.jpg (720x1280, 195.41K)

There's like 3.

Never played Origins, but just from what I've seen in Odyssey, Origins is probably better. After a while the game feels like a parody or MMO doing dailies and the only fun to get out of it is the pretty sights. Voice acting is whatever, story is more stupid than interesting, and the gameplay deephasizes stealth so much that you have to bend over backwards to get it to work and when you do it turns you into a glass cannon that can only do damage once every minute or so.

Yeah but I felt greece was totally uninteresting (compared to Origins at least).
Mostly empty, almost no big cities, largely unimpressive landmarks (with very few exceptions), eveything looks generally the same.

Origins's areas had visually different biomes, you went from totally urban areas to the jungle, from sandy desert to flourishing oasis, from flower fields to the mediterranean sea
You even got three cultures (therefore, three architectures and visual styles) clashing on the same map: greeks and egyptians (both ancient and contemporary) plus romans

No such variety can be found in Odyssey

Vikings have been the rumor because The Division 2 got a random update out of nowhere that had posters with vikings and an artist who was working at Ubisoft had some concept art of random vikings up as well. I think Kotaku had an article about the "rumor" of vikings, and every time Kotaku posts a "rumor" about AC it ends up being actual information. Keep in mind they've leaked Unity, Syndicate, Origins, and I think Odyssey at this point months before release. They even had WIP gameplay footage of Unity and Syndicate.

At the same time Ubisoft has delayed pretty much everything they were going to release after that last Ghost Recon game bombed horribly and they were asking questions about how people feel about ships being prevalent in the series going further leading people to speculate if they're in the process of reworking stuff. Vikings would have ships but from what I understand they didn't really fight on the sea, they usually boarded each other and fought on the ship at sea. If anything it would basically be Origins/Odyssey ship combat but you're only locked to using the javelin throw.

>yet another game with a norse-inspired setting
Make it stop MAKE IT STOOOOP

if they follow along the lines of Origins then I think it will do just fine

Thanks for the info. Have a memewave pic.

Ubisoft makes the kind of games I like, but they're such a shit company, they'll fuck it up like Breakpoint. Remember, no preorders.

Attached: 1572883564433.jpg (1080x831, 454.12K)

Viking Europe sounds even less interesting to explore than the ACIII setting, they'll probably go down the Odyssey route and fill it with norse mythology shit

That's not a nigger you utter retard, that's an egyptian.
This one, however...

Attached: 1583418239963.jpg (1920x1080, 432.52K)

I see no negroes there

>Remember, no preorders.
Never. I always wait for them to drop to $20 (Or $30 in the case of Deluxe Editions) before I even think of picking them up. They make enjoyable games and usually have a lot of production value in them, but at the same time I dislike a lot of their business practices and they tend to use some of the "safest" designs they can which lead to the game being brought down by those decisions. Still, AC as a series has so many neat things in it and usually they have enjoyable stories, plus their side games like Mario + Rabbids, Rayman, and Steep are fun too.

ohnononononONONONONON is this fucking REAL???!
LMAOLOMOMA

Depends entirely if you like Ancient Greek or Ancient Egyptian
Realistically though Ass creed peaked at 2 and black flag was the last good one

Agreed. I kind of feel like Steep went under the radar for a lot of people. It is what it is, no bullshit attached, just fun. I still go back and play it for a bit once or twice a month.

Origins still has a much better world, Greece feels like a generic open world world with bits of Ancient Greece thrown in. The ambientation is also way off and the story sucks ass because of giving you a pseudo self-insert character that still follows a set path which means that the character can never be interesting or have a personality to give you room to make dialog choices that ultimately don't matter at all.

While Origins was still dragged down by Aya, Bayek's story is leagues ahead.

Is she cosplaying Kratos?

It's a shame it's all over the place in terms of support. They said they wanted to keep supporting it which is why we got that X-Factor DLC, but since then it seems like it's just monthly unlockables and ridiculously overpriced clothes that take hours to grind for. Olympics DLC also felt ridiculously locked down due to all the restrictions the Olympic Committee set in place, from what I remember you couldn't even roam around Seoul.