Why is 2 so much better than 1? Did they learn a lot from the 1st game...

Why is 2 so much better than 1? Did they learn a lot from the 1st game? Or did they have more freedom in not having to shoehorn backer rewards in?

Attached: 126f60f164d9530b31226d7794719a505dbee4780c31f77673297b40d7c101df_product_card_v2_mobile_slider_639.jpg (639x361, 42.84K)

They balanced the hand holding vs the rail roading of story much better.

Currently doing the 2, does this mean that the first one isn't worth playing?

What's so bad about the first one? I've had it for ages but haven't got around to playing it yet

There are a handful of fights in 2 that bring the game down a solid letter grade each time you get to them.

Attached: 1584906322666.png (743x715, 394.6K)

Such as? Other than the firefighting skeleton bullshit in arx

I think the thing that turns people off of the first game is that its really goofy.

I played two then one and enjoyed both games.

It's not better than 1. The entire last 3rd of the game is utter shit.

Are you going to claim the last 3rd of 1 was good? A fucking secret hunt to be able to get to the last dungeon? Get the fuck outta here.

both of them are relentlessly "goofy"