There are people on this board that think Bannerlord is worse than Warband

>explain yourself
Bannerlord is not yet balanced.
Bannerlord doesn't run as well yet.
Bannerlord still bugs, glitches, crashes and leaks memory too often.
Bannerlord doesn't have as many or as big in scope mods yet.
Bannerlord is too fast, the family system is wasted when the whole world is united in a single empire within the first lifetime.
Bannerlord is liked by everyone, including casual normies, meaning I gain cred by saying I dislike it.

Attached: 20200404200615_1.jpg (1920x1080, 485.35K)

well, horse archers effectively cost ~1500 more than any other unit to fully upgrade, so it's kind of balanced that way

and with how clumsy she is, not even able to escape her captors... so sad!

>aserai recruits are all free anti-cav units
>aserai borders the horsefucks
GOD
DAMN IT
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>horse archers
>historically accurate

Its literally a straight upgrade in every way

see It will may... be a straight upgrade in 20 months or so.

Attached: 20200404202217_1.jpg (1920x1080, 557.53K)

>Bannerlord doesn't run as well yet.
runs better than warband, although jumping between menus is fucking slow as hell
>Bannerlord still bugs, glitches, crashes and leaks memory too often.
true. they seem to put out a patch every day fixing problems like this but this might take a while.
>Bannerlord doesn't have as many or as big in scope mods yet.
no modding tools until release. kinda sad but they had a solid reason for it (although they could just release the tools but tell the modders that their mods WILL keep breaking almost daily and no amount of whining will stop it until the day of the release)
>Bannerlord is too fast, the family system is wasted when the whole world is united in a single empire within the first lifetime.
absolutely this, I hope it's an easy fix for modders if the native doesn't change this

>Picrelated
I have a town with 9k prosperity and this does not happen, its a result of villigers not being able to get to the settlement, download the patrols mod it helps a lot, though battanian fiefs will never have this problem. V's garrisons dont starve is also good. This is nto an excuse taleworlds should fix this.
>Bannerlord is not yet balanced.
It is not balanced no, battanians and sturgians struggle without reliably recrutible archers. And horse archers are absolutely broken in a stack agaisnt anything but pure foot archer.
>Bannerlord doesn't run as well yet.
Yeah it doesnt, some good progress though, 1.0.9 was a great a patch for my RAM problems.
>Bannerlord still bugs, glitches, crashes and leaks memory too often.
i've yet to actually crash, or encounter significant bugs since release. Though I knew how broken quests were and didnt save scum, this explains this.
>Bannerlord doesn't have as many or as big in scope mods yet.
Actually, it already has brilliant mods. Once they expand the smithing system a little more, and make it easy ti import armours, I image the faction mods we'll get will be brilliant. Theres already some great stuff and passionate modders working user.
>Bannerlord is too fast, the family system is wasted when the whole world is united in a single empire within the first lifetime.
True, it's kinda a botched idea, give this one some time I think, it doesn't reflect well i nthe current version of the game.
>Bannerlord is liked by everyone, including casual normies, meaning I gain cred by saying I dislike it.
Oh, did you expect a shitpost answer user? Honestly your not very wrong.
This doesn't make it not a fun game though, its very fun :^)

based reason user Chads, enjoying games despite their faults and not cherrycoating their problems but instead embracing them as progress.

Attached: Yes.jpg (669x573, 72.76K)

>Download a mod to lower stamina reqs for smithing and set the part unlocks to 10x, from the default 4 to 40
>still takes ages to even get some parts
Holy shit this is crap.

it's not that easy to have an objective view of something that you really want to be good, but it's also silly to be unreasonably negative and think every dev is out there to just get your money and run.

>I have a town with 9k prosperity and this does not happen, its a result of villigers not being able to get to the settlement, download the patrols mod it helps a lot, though battanian fiefs will never have this problem. V's garrisons dont starve is also good. This is nto an excuse taleworlds should fix this.
The castle in question doesn't get any trade. The villages tied to it would rather travel farther and trade in the cities than this castle. I manually patrolled for a while, following them, they just don't come to feed my garrisons, they travel far, far away to trade with another faction even.

Attached: 20180626001244_1.jpg (1920x1080, 785.41K)

Do Aserai have Tier 5+ armors? They only have 2 cities with smiths and they're on opposite ends of their kingdom so it takes a lot to check on them.

At least Warband doesn't mine bitcoins

What are imperial menavliton or how you spell them are for? Looks like a worse option to the other infantry options

they have 2 handed spears

It's not your PC, the game just lacks optimization.

they have big spears that kill everything in one hit
on the flip side they have no shields so they die in one hit as well, shit unit

>crashes
>perks not working
>experience gain needs a complete rebalance
>smithing needs a rework from the ground up
>siege AI is absolutely awful
>companion system is shit
>mounted melee combat feels a lot shittier, the changes to hit detection make the combat a lot less fun
>archers are strong as fuck

It barely improves anything over Warband and even those things are broken. It's undeniably worse in its current state. Not to even mention minor subjective pet peeves like how aesthetically garbage it is to have these color coded armies as if you were leading tabletop toy soldiers. Earlier screenshots didn't have this bullshit.

Attached: ss_52fd6b0164511a5a95f471dd6d0ffe94fb544156.jpg (1920x1080, 668.68K)

large scale battles work better in bannerlord and they are more fun to look at, that's all that matters and why bannerlord is superior

It's sad that it still sells like hot cakes because a ton of retards got hyped into the game.

@503031117
@503031006
>samefagging your failed doomposts

The levelling is retarded, the UI is shit, the characters look like complete mongoloids. Endless bugs and imbalances and the fact that modders did a better on improving warband than Taleworlds did in 8 years of Bannerlord even though they practically cut and paste 80% of it.

It's not bad at all, it's just very disappointing. They had 100+ people, 8 years of dev time, and a gigantic budget. THIS is all they could manage? A copy paste of the previous game with like 3 added features, and none of them work? Like a bad joke.

No, no, my PC is pretty shit, CPU is i5 4460.

I don't think anyone is pretending that it looks worse.

Most people claim it does not look as so much of an improvement as the 8 year development time would warrant, or does not improve any systems from Warband. 90% of those people have not actually played either of the game, and are just desperate to jump on the "look at how edgy and jaded I am" train.

>tfw i3-6100
hello my poorfag bro

I hate the clipping on this dress

Aiming crosshair for bows and archery in general is worse.
What's even the point it was the only way to enjoy combat. Otherwise you have tog et on the horse against overwleming numbers of enemy adn that's just gay gameplay.

???
It's not
Archery is perfectly fine and still OP like it should be

Bannerlord is a fun game but it's so blatantly unfinished that I don't know why they bothered to release it in its current state.

It's basically No Man's Sky right now.

Or they did and aren't fanboys lying to themselves about how shit it

>Or they did and aren't fanboys lying to themselves about how shit it
Nah, not really. Keep on pretending though, it really impresses us all here!

Who else is going to laugh when it never gets fully finished

>all these poorfags complaining about performance
ryzen 3700x no issues

Attached: 1579285612491.jpg (600x800, 61.76K)

Keep sucking Taleworlds dicks

Again, you are really impressing us all here.

I started playing Warband again the other day because despite having over 200 hours played I've never actually beaten it and I don't wanna ruin Bannerlord for myself by playing it too much while it's still EA. One thing I'm glad got a much-needed fix in Bannerlord from what I've seen is Sieges because holy shit they're nearly unbearable in Warlord.

GPU is the problem, even a 2080 Ti can't run large battles at 60fps

Just set settings to high or medium at that scale the graphical differences between the upper settings is miniscule

Or the developers could optimize the game

Why do you have the expectations that a sandbox game with ridiculous AI count should run at 60 fps in every circumstance?

>use an ancient CPU from 2014
>what the FUCK the game runs bad dudes I just got this 1080 last year!! UNOPTIMIZED!!!!! Warband(from 2010) runs perfectly on my machine!

Everyone go home and kill yourselves.

Patch e1.1.0 out now.
2.3gb of fixes and improvements.
Even two new items even though they said no new items until they were satisfied with stability.

>Yas Forums hates turks with passion
>also Yas Forums riding their dick for this game
its hard to take people serious here

Performance:
* Ram and VRAM usage is reduced and many leaks are fixed.
* Scene loading performance improvements.
* Improved the performance of the sound system.
* Big improvements for the multi-core performance of the game.
* We now select Maximum sound count according to your CPU's core count. You can increase this setting if you have a recent CPU. We've also added a new very low(64) option.
* Some other minor performance improvements.

Because AI doesn't use my GPU and my CPU is perfectly fine?

I have a 3600x and a 2070s, scenes at standard settings with NO ENEMIES ALIVE are running at sub 30 fps and somehow you find that acceptable

Works fine on my machine.
Sort yourself out.

Yes "ma'am"

>retard can't differentiate memes from legitimate opinions

>Yas Forums is one person

Sure it does when you consider sub 30 fps fine you stupid fucking mongoloid. If there weren't performance issues then why are the developers making such big efforts to improve the performance? You goddamn shills are so backwards.

>make Khuzait horse archer
>200 horses
>press F1+F3 and relax
>kill everything that moves
>annihilate armies of 1200+ with no losses

>make Vladian knight
>diverse army with crossbowmen, cavalry and footmen
>take heavy losses from every battle
>total control of the troops is necessary to avoid failure

Horse fuckers might be too easy, currently.

Mine always runs above 60fps.
Think you can stop crying or do I need to call your mom to come get you?

that unironically looks worse than warband in every way

>very low 1280x576

Is that all you can play on?
I genuinely feel bad for you. Upgrade your shit before whining.