What is RE3 worth?

$30, maybe $40 if you are really craving it after REmake 2

>tfw got it for less

Attached: KQwsDOn7gpaI5iuo.gif (220x318, 1.16M)

>5 hours
>total play time 8 hours

I paid $20 bucks for RE2make and I considered that a steal. For this game it appears that should be the starting price and I won't be touching it with a 10 foot pole until it comes down.

Attached: Only kids play Easy Mode.jpg (480x360, 46.11K)

How embarrassing.

he played the game for basiclaly 8 hours, not 5 hours
somehow this guy took over half an entire day playing the game on the easiest mode possible and still got an in game final score of 90min. did he just die very frequently or keep resetting?

>Total play time: 8 hours
>Total play time: 13 hours

You faggots just love going OHNONONO don't you?

It's worth many trips to the spank bank

Considering the slobbering retard that made that twitter post also didn't notice the total time tells you that TORtanic nigs are on the same level as your average twitter retard.

how do I overcome my fears and play through RE2

What are your fears? Also, play it on PC and mod the fuck out of it.

Are cutscenes factored in?

Cutscenes, and times where you died and got booted back to a checkpoint aren't included in clear time but are in total time.
Strange considering the people that LARP about being true RE fans and about how 3 was longer don't realize that 3 is repugnantly short with the door load skip.

>hes also shit
And still beat it in 5 hours. Really makes you think.

Actually 8.
On standard.
*Dabs on u*
*Watches u seethe*

They could have at least added a mercenaries mode.

alcohol is so disgusting

b&r

>takes 8 hours to beat a 4 hour game
yikes

>total playtime 8hrs
>clear time 5hrs

Hmmm ...

Everyone who ever played RE3 was yelling at the top of their lungs that this game would be extremely short, especially because they cut the optional side content which was the actual real meat and potatoes of the game.

Now all the normies are mad because they didn't listen.

>play RE game
>Only play through it once
Why do people do this? Why did people not complain this much about RE7, which is even shorter than RE3, and had less content.

Attached: 1580487314950.jpg (358x449, 25.94K)

20€
Usually love replaying RE games but that fucking hospital defense part is cancer and I don't want to do it again.

$20 expansion for RE2

Bro you better stop doing that right now.
That thing where you point out flaws in old thing to defend new thing.
I'm going to call you a shill if you don't stop.

£20 more like 15$

This would have worked perfectly since the two games take place at the same time roughly. Capcom got too greedy this time.

>old things
RE7 came out 3 years ago and was so fucking barren that the game got DLC the week after it launched. RE3 has always been a short game, even with the cuts, the remake is still longer than the original. Really, what were people expecting? REmake 2 got two campaigns because so did the original and they still fucked up with that game because the fucked up the B scenario.

oh get it
he thinks critically but also drinks
Nice
jack daniels
jack daniels
jack daniels
jack daniels
whisky
mature men like myself

Attached: 41g-pRMsNML.jpg (313x500, 27.06K)

I only say that because people will defend RE7 and even R2make now because they're cheaper and the kids can bug their parents to get the game.
It's literally the only reason people try so hard to shit on new games here, because they don't want to fork up 60 bucks because they're on consoles, or they can't get a crack.
While the game has shortcomings, every single fucking game does, and the amount someone is willing to put up with is completely dependant on who they are individually, so this notion of "U CAN ONLY LIKE DIS GAME IF U SHILL" just seems pushed hard by kids that can't conjure up 60 bucks and want to make it seem like saving 40 bucks over the course of 3 months is some sort of life hack and not a waste of time if you want to play the fucking game.

clearly the intention was to replay it a few times, it's not a one and done kind of game

Heh. The sad thing is it’s probably still way better than Final Fantasy VII.

None shitpost answer - maybe not, but it's still a good game. If you like Resistance then it probably will be though

It's stressful with limited resources, backtracking and enemies you can't afford to kill

The fuck did I just read here?

>which is even shorter than RE3
it isnt
>and had less content.
it doesnt

its also a brand new game instead of raping the corpse of RE3 nemesis 1999

Attached: __1.png (1264x539, 839.99K)

>Really, what were people expecting?
Value for their dollar? Games were generally short back in the day. That's not the case now. It's hard to justify $60 for a 2 hour game with little replayability.

You see my friend, there are two kinds of people in this world. Those who drink Jack Daniels™ and those who won't ever get laid.
Have another glass of water.

have people forgotten how shitty and scripted RE3 was? it was first attempt to make RE into action game.

>5 hour game
>still took 8 hours
oof

So excited to play this at $20. Will be playing 5 and 6 for the first time meanwhile

>Dude lmao its ok because the original was also super short

Yeah he should just kill himself

Some games are good but can wear out their welcome if they are too long. Maybe 5 hours is what they figured RE3's window is. Force a play tester to just play the game for as long as possible till they feel ready to do something else. Magic number? I don't know. Everything is intentional, on purpose - in my opinion. Would it really have been better padded out into a grind fest? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not.

>Games were generally short back in the day
I remember when I was a kid, X-Play described Fable as something along the lines of "a short 14 hour adventure but it will be a blast"

>almost exactly the same length as RE2R
>nobody complained about the length there

If you're gonna attack the game, you may as well attack it for it's actual, legitimate flaws.

Attached: 1494720736347.jpg (600x600, 89.88K)

OH NO NO NO NO RE3 BROS, GOBLIN JILL WAS MEANT TO SAVE OUR FRANCHISE

Attached: 1586347537837.jpg (1032x581, 47.54K)

Short for an RPG, yes.
No one expects a fighting game campaign to be 40 hours bro, you're mixing apples and oranges.

>cuts out the total time played part

One had a smoking hot asian girl and the other had a goblina.

This faggot is a whiny pretentious wannabe of QuarterPounder and continues to be eternally assmad at TLJ.
RE3 is based, fuck him.

Based Leonposter

That has been RE thing since the beginning. Almost every RE game is short. Most of the games are designed for multiple playthroughs. RE2 is short as hell too. Ita just doesnt seem that long because it has two campaigns and its actually shorter than the original because they removed the B scenario. If you were really expecting then to make a longer game for RE3 when they already half assed RE2, you deserve to be ripped off.

RE7 does have less content. Here's all its content
>An extra difficulty
>A few extra weapons
>A few extra items
I'm not factoring in Not a Hero till RE:3's a year old, since that's how fucking long I had to wait for Not a Hero.
RE:3's content
>two extra difficulties
>more extra weapons
>more extra items
>a costume
>key items unlocked from the start
>inventory expansions
>a full multiplayer mode
Also, RE7 is the shorter game between the two, the only reason it feels longer is because it's more linear and setpiece drive.

I'm not too bothered about the fact it's not that long, because neither was the original. I'm more bothered about the fact the game cost full price because they decided to shoehorn that fucking multiplayer game onto it.

I paid $20 for 2 during a steam sale and will be doing the same for this game.

But Claire is in RE2 too.

>each playthrough even on assisted is longer than RE2 remake speedruns
haha what's this meant to prove, that this is longer? well done retard.

> What is RE3 worth?
$19.99

>Everything is intentional, on purpose - in my opinion.
yeah they intentionally didn't want to spend any more time and money developing it because they knew retarded RE fans would buy and defend it anyway

>Also, RE7 is the shorter game between the two, the only reason it feels longer is because it's more linear and setpiece drive.
7 is like 10 hours long, what are you smoking?

10 hours long if it's your first survival horror RE game, sure. I bet if RE:3 was your first survival horror RE, it'd take you a long fucking time.

Almost like you’re supposed to replay the game until you’ve mastered it like the original

Biggest letdown about the remake was no Clock Tower and no Park. Imagine seeing this in the RE Engine.

Attached: ClockTower.jpg (480x360, 19.47K)

>rush through game
>use that time as your basis
If we're going down that retarded route, then 3 is still shorter.

They’re made to be replayed idiot.

>little replayability.
Are you kidding?

Took me longer than RE7, I don't know what to tell you.
Didn't 7fags die out years ago when they realized their game was a scripted VR tech demo?

Wow. That's even worse than I expected.

Attached: 1586519984864.png (666x236, 84.07K)

The Umbrella lab was far blander than in the original, too. There’s a ton of problems with RE3make but the length isn’t one of them

It's over RE3 shills... We lost...

Attached: 1586340725950.png (638x599, 204.19K)

>bro just replay the same content until it's worth $60

Attached: 2qmyau.jpg (326x294, 18.14K)

How many times are going to autistically play through a 2 hour campaign? At least RE2 gave you the illusion of a fresh experience by choosing between Claire or Leon. With that justification the game could be even shorter and maintain its price tag.

crazy how it's only mainstream journos who shat on it and are currently deliberating on re-reviewing it because they didn't inform people ifnerno and its changes existed kek

Much better than the lab in RE2. RE3 doesnt even have a fucking lab in the original and yet they made a better one than the lab in RE2. Why the fuck did RE3 even need a lab section when RE2 had one ?

Nah he's right 7 is absolutely longer than 3 it's not even a debate

>enemies you cant afford to kill
user...you have shit loads of ammo.

Its genuinely hilarious looking at some remake drone shit on RE7 when its exactly REmake3 that 7 absolutely shits on. Jack is a more complex pursuer than nemesis and 7 actually has some stealth mechanics to go with it so you have your real time live selection moments when jack is coming. Its a new game, it gets all the praise. Your shitty cashgrab literally had a cheatsheet and the best it could do was a 2 hours long cinematic experience where nemesis gets called a shitbird the one time he dares to pop up for an epic tomb raider chase scene

>Same content
The difficulties change up the game.

Walk past lickers and kill everything else. You'll have plenty of ammo even on Hardcore.

You're wrong.

Nothing...

Everything

That was a letdown too. The remake needed

>Expanded city streets, at least an extra hour's worth of content
>More freeroaming areas in the city where Nemesis can chase you, like Mr. X in RE2
>Clock Tower and Park segments
>Dead Factory segment or at least have the NEST 2 lab be 3x as big
>Save Jill's famous S.T.A.R.S. line for when she's about to kill Nemesis with the plasma cannon

Overall I think the game came out too soon. It could have used another 8-12 months of development.

There’s extra difficulties that completely change the layout of enemies and items. Actually do some research into the series and the content the games usually have before complaining

no I'm not 7 is longer than 3

>Actually do some research into the series and the content the games usually have before complaining
Good one user.
I'm sure the guy will claim he's a long time fan despite clearly being a newfaggot child.