Final Fantasy VII Remake Metacritic user reviews are up
>8.1
Final Fantasy VII Remake Metacritic user reviews are up
OH NO NO NO NO NO
What’s the highest user score?
*paid reviews
I seen retards saying they were giving it a '10' to counter the 'trolls'
>35 reviews
Why are zoomers so bad at comprehending how averages work? Happens all the time in regards to understanding Metacritic.
It's user reviews, you could literally write a bad one right now if you played the game and feel that way
>it's already at 7.9
This reply is not going to age well
Gamespot has Ocarina at a 96 with over 30,000 user reviews.
Eternal Senia has the lowest amount of negative reviews for any game with 10k+ positive reviews
Gived it a 10 just to counter balance all the man children spamming undeserved 0s in the user ratings.
>Its another 0 vs 10 episode
>Zoomer trying to meme SOUL
That's low even for them.
Oh shit, Time Jannies just took out 3 negative reviews, the game was rigged from the start
What? You fucking retard, that’s exactly my point. The fewer data points available, the more unreliable a data set is. 35 reviews is nothing when it’ll reach 4000+.
I will never stop laughing at metacritic reviews
like square gives a shit, they are making mad bank atm
No he's shilling so hard he's asserting that people who don't like the game literally have no souls.
>That review in spanish
>inevitable review bomb will tank the score even further
gee wiz good golly who would've thunk
>"One of the best looking games this generation"
Really? I'm not really impressed by the graphics. It has some nice views but all in all it is very inconsistent (muddy textures) and maybe okay looking at best.
And it's the best one on that print.
copy paste translate it for me bros
fuck this faggot
You've read that before, he says the game is good and very nostalgic for the first 35h, and it all comes tumbling down in the last hour of the game because of the convoluted new additions to the story. And ends sarcastically thanking Nomura.
I honestly didn't even know the game was 36h long lol
It'll be anywhere between like 10 and 40 hours. Average will be around 30 going by the past week of reports.
>7.9
LMAO
This game isn't going to fail just because you guys are leaving negative "reviews".
the shit goes off the rails the second you meet aerith. it's worse than we though
There is an absolute fuck tonne of terrible , terrible padding side quests and npc dialogues, people randomly stop aerith on the street to talk to her about utter gibberish for up to 3 minutes etc just to squeeze another 3 minutes out of an area etc it's all so obvious when they are padding, games pacing is an absolute mess
That dude was enjoying the game so he probably took his time with it. Reasonable.
Kinda surprises me he scored it so low, that was a honest review.
I think it's time we got together and review bombed the shit out of it. That fucking hack, Nomura, deserves this.
>it really respects the original
>I love all the changes and the new story!
Nice false flagging you pathetic squeenux shill
>People without a soul and nostalgia
Kek okay buddy
Yas Forums is having a total melty right now
The person has clearly not even played the game yet, either that or he only watched advent children
Barry review bombin as hard as he can
He might be shitposting but I'll leave a few bad reviews. Fuck SE and fuck Nomura. They killed off most of the franchises that I loved.
WE ARE Yas Forums. WE ARE LEJUN
Game came literally out today and people already gave it 0/10s and 10/10s. User score is unironically even more worthless than critic score.
He's trying to get the thread closed by insinuating that the intention of this thread is to rally people to reviewbomb the game
>Implying it isn't
>for the first 35h
The game isn't even that long and goes to shit after only a couple of hours.
>Yas Forums was wrong again and freaked out over nothing
Further proof that people here live in an autism bubble that the real world doesnt care about
Days of shitposting and hysterics for nothing
Can't you see how bad the user scores are? Game is absolute horseshit and also not what was advertised
>8+ is bad
Insane cope
so this is the power of metacritic
>Yas Forums review bombing a game is now somehow an indicator of quality
The user score is just your average Yas Forums shitposting thread put into numbers.
>plays the game for 35h and give it a 0
0 should be given to unplayable games, if you don't like how the story goes you still need to rate the other aspects of the game, this isn't a book review
The game being different and sill a success literally broke Yas Forums
I'm sure at least a couple of anons have commited suicide over FF7R by now
This is why I don't complain a out religious nutjobs.
We would also be killing ourselves over consoles if such was allowed.
At least they gave a 0/10 score to FF7R and holds on to their Animal Crossing cart before hanging.
Based Kisekibro, at least our series is good.
>Aerith
Who the fuck is that? A new character?
look at that score drop as the initial shill 10's
are buried under pople who actually have something to say about the game.
>another kisekibro
If this ain't a bruh moment, I dunno what is
>respect for the source material
THEY DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING PLAY IT. HOW THE FUCK COULD YOU SAY THAT SHIT?!!? HOW?
based persona chads
Or that person is sitting in this thread.
>Nomura COLLAPSE
I hope Aeris dies again.
Wait until they remove the reviewbombing
metacritic score was always and will always be a cheap shitpost material,same with twitch views
oh nononono it's going down
Very subtle, Yas Forums.
What did Sakurax mean by this?
>officially orange
OH NO NO NO AHAHAHA
I mean it's a very lacklustre poorly written review but it coneys our basic feelings.