FF7 Remake is a 10/10 game

>a compelling story
>cleverly seeded story teases
>bolstering the core narrative
time ghosts lmfao

10/10 doesnt mean perfect games. Means that they are just better than 9/10, where the flaws affect more the game than 10/10.
By your logic (because there are no perfect games), we should just eliminate 10/10 and just have 9.9999999.... and lower.

Gamespot stopped having good taste a long time ago

> Greatest games ever - Gamespot Article from 2006
> 1. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
> 2. SoulCalibur
> 3. Chrono Cross
> 4. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night
> 5. StarCraft Brood War
> 6. The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening
> 7. Fallout [1998]
> 8. Star Control II
> 9. Street Fighter 2:The World Warrior
> 10. Final Fantasy Tactics
> 11. X-Com UFO Defence
> 12. Grim Fandango
> 13. Wipeout XL
> 14. Mortal Kombat II
> 15. Super Mario World
> 16. Twisted Metal 2
> 17. Counter Strike
> 18. Mega Man 2
> 19. Rayman 2: The Great Escape
> 20. Phantasy Star IV

> Greatest Games Ever - Gamespot 2020
> 1. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
> 2. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
> 3. SoulCalibur
> 4. Final Fantasy VI
> 5. EarthBound
> 6. Tony Hawk: Pro Skater 3
> 7. Chrono Cross
> 8. Super Mario 64
> 9. Bayonetta 2
> 10. GoldenEye 007
> 11. Rock Band 3
> 12. Journey
> 13. Half-Life 2
> 14. Halo Combat Evolved
> 15. Disco Elysium
> 16. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
> 17. Persona 5 Royal
> 18. Final Fantasy VII Remake
> 19. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of Patriots
> 20. Grand Theft Auto IV

>Someone who got a review copy outed SquareEnix for demanding high review scores
>People still take any of the review serious

LOL.
kys

>cleverly seeded story teases that evoke key beats from the original
That's a really, really charitable way of saying they show you Meteor impacting before you finish leaving Midgar.

lol

Attached: mpv-shot0022.jpg (1920x1080, 197.24K)

Or just do what I say and leave 10/10 empty because that's reserved for perfection. When there is a designation that is strictly a perfect score that can go no higher, only entries that share that trait (perfect) belong there. That's the only way for the rating system to actually hold quantifiable, legitimate accuracy. Basically perfect does not mean perfect. Basically alive does not mean alive.

>IGN
>Trustworthy

or better yet, we use 10/10 since 9.999999764/10 is harder to measure

First list is pure kino

Or you simply rate imperfect games as 9. That's how easy it is. Does the game have some shit you didn't like? Well, then it's not a 10. Does the game function? Well, then it's not a 1.

Shut the fuck up, you math nigger. 10/10 does not mean perfect.

its gamespot. IGN gave it an 8

IGN gave it an 8 nigger

Both of you have it wrong. 10/10 is the premium rating. You get a 10/10 if you give the big bucks.

>cut more out of the original game than RE3 did
>10/10 ME LOVE SQUARE SUGOIIII NEEEE ^__^
Fuck gamespot, they wrote a fucking ethics piece on No Russian in 2020 ffs

that's fucking retarded

ever heard of rounding

>lets put in 9/10 good games that are 10/10 with flaws but minimal to others that deserve 9/10 because their flaws are more noticeable
Nah, its better to measure 10/10 as "better than 9/10 and top games" rather than perfect game.
Sounds like you are just triggered at seeing flaws on a game yet called 10/10 when it doesnt even pretend to call it perfect.

hi ps2 textures

10/10 is a perfect score. It should be reserved for perfect games. You undermine the credibility of your publication if you give perfect results to things alongside their flaws. The problem is the "out of 10" system. You can avoid this very easily by making it out of 100.

>"this game is a seminal masterpiece that is in a league of its own above its contemporaries"
>"but it's not a 10 because there's some textures in one are that take a few seconds longer to load"

>You undermine the credibility of your publication if you give perfect results to things alongside their flaws.
no publication defines a 10/10 as a perfect game with no flaws.

And when you're in charge of giving a score to a game you can do that if you want to.

How do I get those nighers at GameStop to give me my pre order early?

IGN and Gamespot literally asks weeb autists to review weeb games like Persona and FF7. Any other score would be a surprise.

Attached: 112f6c418137b5d46bbedd1f4bfc6675.jpg (640x960, 61.71K)

Because they're not interested in accuracy. They're a marketing arm for the video game industry.

youtu.be/IgXj6dJAzt0?t=618
You only need the last minute to discredit the whole thing.
>that last line
>that fucking last line
I'm gonna read up more about the person that reviewed it.

>no mention of chrono niggers
What happened bros?

So this is the guy
opencritic.com/critic/704/tamoor-hussain
What do you think?

it's not a matter of accuracy. 10/10 means you are in the top category of games. that's it. the 1-10 scale is to be understood as a ranking system.

Attached: 1523613851421.jpg (145x60, 2.99K)

>it's not a matter of accuracy.
I just said that, retard.

>Prey 6/10
Yikes opinion discarded.

Prey is fucking shit

>tamoor-hussain
fucking mudslime nigger

>worried about Prey
>not worried about the fact vanilla KH3 is a 4.5 at best and he gave 8

>Normies in the comments love it because it preemptively makes them feel good about a game they haven't played yet
Reviews are ads, why are bothering discussing this?

>plot changes aren't mentioned on either pros or cons

Attached: 1500355656674.gif (498x498, 612.95K)

Rather than race, what about the age?

>21 reviews in 6 years

Attached: 1410482698737.gif (360x199, 1.76M)

Do reviewers get paid by the line or something? Those last 4 positives are all just praising story/characters

>review praises the story
Review discarded. There is no defending that bullshit.

by continuing to insist that 10/10 means a game has no flaws, you are demonstrating that you don't understand.

While taking the name of another franchise definetly knocks a full point off the score, Prey is an excellent game for folks who like gameplay. If you believe that Prey is trash, then your opinion is trash.
This reviewer in question not only gave Prey 6/10, but also scores Capeshit Telltale games garbage higher, solidifying his status as not worth listening too.
And I am a person who is actually excited for the time jannies and wasnt going to be buying a soulless scene for scene remake.

Because you can't know yet, part 2 will tell how dumb it is or not.

I'm just looking forward to comfy times hanging out with characters that I like. I couldn't give a shit about time traveling ghosts or whatever.

>Trust review scores
>Instead of playing the game and forming your own opinion

>episode 1 of 7
>10/10
this aint it chief

>the good
>combat
>characters
>plot
>plot
>plot
sounds like a decent movie

He's a boomer too, to make things worse.
The game as a game is perfectly fine, the plot is indefensible.
You either hate it or you're part of the problem.

Attached: hussain.png (374x170, 6.41K)

>A perfect score doesn't mean the product is perfect, retard
wut

Attached: 1575347404220.png (608x763, 522.67K)

>Extra, optional content is a con

Actually, casual players including me liked it.
What are you gonna do now ? bomb Squeenix HQ ?? yeah right.

>changebad ghosts are a good thing
literally nobody thinks this

10/10 is perfect. Imperfect games do not deserve 10/10s. This is not up for discussion. Using a rating system that designates perfect scores to imperfect games is not a reliable system.

I fucking hate this black or white mentality, like I can't just be excited to play the game part of the game, I HAVE to either love or hate the story changes, when really, I don't care that much. I wanted an action game with an FF7 skin made by some KH guys and that's what I got. If I want to play the original FF7, I'll do that. Hell I am right now.

take all games. sort them into ten piles from worst to best. are any of the games in the pile of best games perfect?

>math niggers

Attached: 1559158457015.jpg (750x738, 351.54K)

>This is not up for discussion
i agree. you're wrong.
>Using a rating system that designates perfect scores to imperfect games is not a reliable system.
the rating system does not itself contain such a thing as a perfect score. it does not measure games by how perfect they are.

Objectively, no, probably not. But that can be said about every single art form because it's all subjective. This is just one faggot's opinion from fucking Gamespot. But saying people don't mean a product is perfect when they give it a 10/10 either makes them retarded or you.

>the rating system does not itself contain such a thing as a perfect score
10 / 10 is perfect. That's what numbers mean.

>Perfect games would therefore need to share the podium with flawed games. That's unacceptable.
Why so? That's how everyone else does it.
Just look at movie reviews that typically use a scale of 5 instead of 10.
The lower the scale the less detailed it becomes.

On a 3 point scale of 1-bad, 2-whatever, and 3-good, would every game that isn't perfect have to settle for a score of 2 just to not share a score 3 "the perfect score"?

A 10/10 isn't perfect. It is merely the highest possible score. And the highest possible score is what a perfect game would get, but that doesn't make that score is perfect or flawless. But if something closer to that is truly what you desire, then maybe you should pursue a scale of 1000 or something.

Yas Forums works on a strict binary of based/cringe
whether you take this seriously or not is a reflection on you.

>while bolstering the core narrative
Yes, Plotergeists really bolster the core narrative.

Attached: 1511937246861.jpg (960x1201, 178.82K)

>Actually, casual players
Never doubted it, I don't know where you got the idea I did.
>I liked Attack of the Clones. However, you will never get me to admit it was a good movie, because it was not. It was a crappy movie.
Is it so hard to say something like this?
>If I want to play the original FF7, I'll do that. Hell I am right now.
>I'm playing what's now forever known as a shitty non-canon old discarded reality where nothing that happens matters
You do you.

>reading a video game review in 2020
this ain't 2010 fag, no one cares what John at IGN says about XYZ game

i don't see how you can engage with the fact that no game is objectively perfect not engage with the idea of the rating system. the number '10' in the rating system does not represent perfection. no publication defines it that way.
that is not what these numbers mean.

>That's how everyone else does it.
That's a logical fallacy. Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's correct.

>A 10/10 isn't perfect
Wrong. A perfect game would receive a 10/10 under ANY system. Under YOUR system, imperfect games get 10/10s. If you're allowing imperfect games to get perfect scores your rating system is meaningless because the designations have no reliable value.

To all the people complaining about how Linear FF7R is. You *do* remember that Midgar's entire structure is Start at point A, run to point B, do a thing. Do this over and over while being forced forward, right?

No no no bros I used this site to shit on RE3 already
SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME IT'S BAD I NEED VALIDATION

Then dont act like a retarded underage fanboy. You look pathetic. Cope.

yes, but in the original, midgar wasn't the entire game

Its not bad.
its just Yas Forumsaggots just seething on something new again like usual.

>SFV Arcade
>9/10
>MvCI
>8/10
Fucking lol.

>If you're allowing imperfect games to get perfect scores your rating system is meaningless because the designations have no reliable value.
what 'reliable value' do the numbers have in the first place? they do not represent anything other than the approval of the reviewer.

Art can never be objectively perfect dumbass

Thats why theres will be another 2 episodes in the works.
Developing AAA high budget video games is hard user.

>Here's FFVIIr
>Yay
>oh it's episodic
>...but why
>to expand on everything from the original
>act like you can go in every sector
>oh, great
>part 1
>FFXIII with fetch/hunt quests sprinkled all over
>won't even go back now because the story has been raped
I swear if Square had a patreon you fucks would be padding it.

fascinating
back to the point though...

And when their rating does not reflect their review it undermines their credibility. That's why giving imperfect games perfect scores is bad.

Wait for FF7R Episode 2 and 3

Thanks for conceding, secondary fag.

which is why art critics do not rate it according to how many degrees away from perfect it is.

>23-year-old game is linear for 6 hours then opens up with a world map
>modern game that has extended those 6 hours into 40+ is entirely linear
I don't even like open world games, but some people were expecting there to be a good reason Part 1 covers so little ground, like exploring new parts of Midgar

then what is a 10/10? are you stupid?

It's like like "minor things that bother me, but it probably doesn't bother the general audience".

Attached: newspaper.png (450x295, 189.09K)

if I'm following the logic here;
it's linear because it's expensive
?