Does it really need a Remake?
Does it really need a Remake?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
it needs to be releaded on PC along with Bloodborne.
no
It needs a PC port now
it needs a version that doesn't run like shit
99% of remakes are bad, so no
>no online in a game with a big online component
It needs a re-release at least
I would like for the chance that they add the cut archstone
This. It needs an HD remaster on current gen platforms.
Yes, it's much more deserving of a remaster than Dark Souls 1 ever was.
you can play it right now at 4K 60fps if you want with rpcs3
anyone too stupid or lazy to deal with emulators can go choke on a dick and die
no
but let the little kids unable to play anything that isn't released this year tell you otherwise
I only want to play DeS for the online aspect of it, if it doesn't have it then I'm not gonna be interested in emulating it since I can just play it on my ps3.
RPCS3 can run it at 4K 144 fps. is that good enough for you?
would rather have a straight remaster with no mechanical changes with the final zone added maybe as DLC, it doesn't need to be remade, it's already pretty much perfect, only things it would benefit from are better graphics quality and frame rate.
Is the remaster rumor true? Or even remotely believable?
>I'm ok with playing a game that was retroactively butchered because it's old
A re-release on PC and modern consoles would be better than a full remake. The game is a classic imo and doesn't need to be redone, even if Miyazaki said he'd do it differently. But Dark Souls Remastered was a fuck up so IDK. Probably Japan Studio and From Software are better off making new stuff. Give me Demon's Souls 2, Bloodborne 2, or a new King's Field or Forbidden Siren.
Why not just play it on your PS3? Thats what I do.
How many Japan Studio games are on PC?
You can already play it in 4k60 with a mid range computer
It doesn't need a remake but it needs to be ported to ps4/5 to iron out some areas. Some places run like shit, especially with a summon.
This, ps3 are easy as shit to mod now you just need a usb drive and an hour out of your day, I'm going back and playing all the ps3 gems I missed for free while I'm out of work.
>butchered
keep paying for those shit demakes and remasters little kid
Because they removed the fucking online functions.
Would be nice to play DeS without item burden
I'd rather buy a remaster than play my copies without the online.
I just want a port that runs well and has online, don't touch the game's graphics or mechanics please.
Also, for people who don't know, there is a private server, just look it up.
>Does it really need a Remake?
>no online server anymore
>MAIN MECHANIC IS ONLINE GAMEPLAY
yes you retard.
A remaster would suffice.
not at all, it already has one. emulation looks amazing
>Is the remaster rumor true?
No
>Or even remotely believable?
No, Sony holds the IP and they don't care enough to do it
How are you enjoying the invasions?
remake would maybe add the last archstone the models are there.
>by From Software
>called "Souls"
In 2020 this would be free money, there's no reason not to
was that sarcasm because theres no online? theres a network function in the emulator already. im sure with time there could be privately hosted servers, right? kinda like how youd do with N64 games like mario party.
Never finished Demon Souls. Got stuck on that flame boss and gave up.
the guys from Bluepoint are working on DeS remaster/remake
He was the hardest boss for sure but he's nothing compared to the bosses in the modern games.
Abhorrent beast is like the flamelurker but 100 times harder.
No, but I welcome one. Not to FF7's caliber, but a little more than what they did for SOTC. Some areas a little bit longer, bosses given new attacks and maybe a few get more than one phase. The core of the game is Souls and that formula just works.
I still play it on PS3, but I have to admit it needs a PC port. Would love to dump it on PS3 and play on PC.
>>MAIN MECHANIC IS ONLINE GAMEPLAY
how can one person be this stupid
you mostly spend your time fighting the fucking framerate and input delays. again, thank fucking god for emulation.
Dark souls was the cut archstone. Anor londo was the land of the giants
character and world tendency are all affected by online there's a entire boss that is build around online pvp.
Those are mechanics, yes. They're not '[the] main mechanic'. Especially not when those all have PvE versions that are now the only versions you can experience without workarounds.
>Does it really need a Remake?
It's probably getting one anyway, FROM's core audience may be small but is loyal/rabid and will buy a console with FROM exclusive
they worked on a dark souls remaster and no one has announced anything to do with demon's souls
Only if they put in the furfag archstone. A remaster would probably ruin the atmosphere / style.
No. It was good enough for PS3, but will be shit today.
>first game with online mechanics from From Software
>le mechanic
tard if you played King's Field 4 you would understand how important online is for the real DeS experience.
You saying that makes me 99% sure you've never played the Kings Field games. Meanwhile I've got the first 3 sitting next to me.
Remasters are not remakes
pffft, okay.
No but it needs a re-release
>first game with online mechanics from From Software
AC4
This
Re-making it would end up destroying what made it such a cult classic.
Updating it to run on modern PCs/consoles would breath life into the game and allow an audience that missed it revisit the game that started it all in the souls/bourne series.
can you explain to me the rights. demon's souls and bloodborne are sony's? while the 3 dark souls weren't?
HA HAHAHA HA Dum Dum HA HAHAHA HA
youtu.be
>demon's souls and bloodborne are sony's?
Yes and Sony hold the IP to both. A remaster would only happen if Sony green-lights and funds it.
>while the 3 dark souls weren't?
FROMs parent company was contracted to make a Dark Souls trilogy if the first Dark Souls game does "well enough".
ok thanks. is there any particular reason why sony didnt buy DaS too?
Based.
They didn't "buy" anything, they requested and funded the games in the same way Bandai Namco did for Dark Souls.
No. Outside some of the bosses and the first level of Tower of Latria the game is completely forgettable and bland compared to DaSo.
seeing as how its the only good souls game yeah i would say it do
They either didn't offer to do it or the parent decided not to sell it.
Sony has in the past tried to acquire studios and IPs like how they're currently trying to do with Silent Hill. But sometimes franchises and companies won't sell their IP because the potential to make more money is still there.
Dark Souls did nothing Demon's Souls didn't aside from connected maps and broken covenants.
Dark Souls also has ridiculous, retarded characters and over the top fantasy worlds whereas Demon's Souls is much more grounded.
>Dark Souls also has ridiculous, retarded characters and over the top fantasy worlds whereas Demon's Souls is much more grounded.
>whereas Demon's Souls is much more grounded.
just stop
It needs a version that doesn't look and run like shit
Demons still looks good, better than DS2 and most of the trash Bandai or Koei throw out at least.
Yes it is.
Compare sage Freke with Logan for example.
Freke was originally a kind teacher, but the more he delves into the soul arts and acquires knowledge, the more he becomes cynical and disattached from humanity until he comes to his final revelation. He undergoes proper character development and accurately explains the thought process that led him to his final resolve. Whether he goes mad in the end or just reaches the natural conclusion of someone who understands the world too well is not clear and up to debate.
Logan on the other hand starts with the same premise as Freke but instead of changing gradually with the knowledge he acquires he just reads a magic book that's too strong so he whips out his dick and goes apeshit on you.
Dark Souls also has utterly retarded characters like Solaire and Siegmeyer, both of which feel like parodies of Biorr and Ostrava, who are much more subtle and logical characters.
Dark Souls is Demon's Souls for children.
>RPCS3 can run it at 4K 144 fps
More like 144p 4 fps lmao
RPCS3, not PS3.
hello timetraveller from half a decade ago
>Earthen Peak wojak
now this is shitposting
>pc
kek
>mad sony gamelets
>whereas Demon's Souls is much more grounded.