How come 4 and 5 weren't as good?

how come 4 and 5 weren't as good?

Attached: Far_Cry_3_PAL_box_art.jpg (283x352, 30.48K)

they didn't really bring anything new to the table

because 2 and 3 weren't as good

you probably like bioshock 1 more than 2

4 is the best Far Cry if you don't count Blood Dragon. 5 is better than 3 mechanically and has better characters overall.

so true. 4 was basically the same but with a worse story, and 5 added a bunch of boring shit that nobody wanted

4 and 5 are the same game as 3 but with better maps.

4 > 3 > 5

Wrong. Best FarCry is FarCry Instincts: Predator.

2 > all

and it didnt even have a story