Favorite game of the series is considered the worst

Yea doesn't the dlc basically shit on all the games at once?

Arkham Origins
Best boss fights, Bamham actually doing detective work.

I absolutely loved the setting, and I'd like to see more games set in Columbia. But the gameplay is too shallow, the maps are small and linear, the choices have no impact.
This game came out two years AFTER Dishonored.

Can't see the haters

Attached: images (4).jpg (208x144, 9.56K)

Based

the first super smash, i like how sluggish and limited it is. keeps it fun. also maybe kiwami over 0, i hated the real estate and host games. it was too much and at least kiwami gives you almost all the essential moves for the main 3 styles rather than 0 where you slowly build up that shit.

>Has the best story
>Has the best villian
>Has the best characterization of the main characters
>Has the best art

Attached: CoM.jpg (350x500, 54.59K)

DS2
Best PVP, best build variety, best bosses

Attached: dark-souls-ii-2.jpg (1530x2157, 1.87M)

Starfox Adventures

Doom 3

Other than some contrarians, 2 is considered the worst.

I'd also go Inifnite > 2> 1

Does Oblivion count?

But these aren't considered the worst in the series

Jak 2

Two has far better gameplay and story when compared to infinite.
Should get some dudes to play bioshock 2 multiplayer some time

I can't stop thinking about this game. I'm obsessed with the beta version especially. God I wish I could play it.

Attached: gears_of_war_judgement_1.jpg (1584x2016, 2.96M)

Attached: RE666.jpg (527x428, 188.05K)

Ratchet and Clank 3 (at least from what I've seen on this board)

The Witcher

I really liked the free-running, how the guy was heavy and thunderous on the city rooftops but agile and flowing in the canopy. The setting was also very lively.
It's definitely bloated but it still feels refreshingly ambitious.

Attached: file.png (470x264, 283.94K)

The word KH by far is DDD and the ps3/4 version didnt even help

Witcher 2

ac1 is undeniable the worst. Everything from 3 on might be shit as well, but 1 was just a repetitive shit fest

CHARLES LEE

wait, people think ratchet and clank 3 was bad? i thought it was considered the best

widely considered the best everywhere

fail

Attached: 224905125.jpg (1271x1600, 553.67K)

Attached: 1f13bb3a472184186ce6b590fb98.jpg (435x500, 53.74K)

On Reddit it is, but this is based 4channel.

I still feel AC1 as a concept is something that has yet to be realized but could be great. I mean, the structure of having a target and being able to do missions to weaken it/prepare yourself seems tailor made for an open-world. In AC it was just boring taks that were gating you from the assassination but imagine this: you have your target in a big palace and you can go kill it whenever you want but maybe you could find some guys to drill an entry point in the sewers, or install a zipline for your escape, or disrupt the delivery of rifles to the guards, or bribe someone to get a disguise,...
In a way the Shadow of X games actually did that but you could make it less systemic.

Did you play the other two before playing this one? If not, how can you possibly like it.

sounds like gta5 heists

I have only ever seen people say 1 and 2 are much better. Not necessarily a bad game, just not as good as the others. Glad to hear some people don't think so

Attached: 5280575.jpg (577x600, 81.74K)

It did.

Deus Ex HR

i thought they were all just as good as each other, but for different reasons

rac 1 is the only one with a good story, rac 2 added weapon upgrading and strafing, rac 3 has nicer movement and i really liked those megaman-esque sidescroller minigames where you play as quark

Driver 2 is the closest I can think of. Sandbox ones don't count.

Attached: 236px-HexenIIbox.jpg (236x279, 22.08K)

This is the only Burnout game I've ever played and loved it. Why is it considered the worst?

3 always just seemed like the most polished overall. I also enjoy the future series with even better movement during combat and the spaceship exploration

Not him but the main criticism I heard is that the takedowns are too easy

Pic related is the only ac where the world actually feels alive

Attached: unity.jpg (1200x675, 261.77K)

My biggest issues with the game are that Haytham is a better character and his stuff was way more interesting, and that the missions/assassinations were way too "follow this check list." They stripped too much of the freedom away. Otherwise it's my favorite setting.

Wasted potential overall.

I genuinely enjoyed going from city to city. It was an early concept but I'm upset they ditched that initially.

>HR
>the worst
What the actual fuck?

love ds2, agree on pvp and builds, but i really cant give you best bosses
some of the dlc bosses are fuckin sick tho

While it was indeed a fun expansion, it tried way too hard to tie Infinite together with the other two games after that whole "constants and variables" bullshit in the main campaign. As a result, it got even more pointlessly convoluted with gaping plot holes and retcons hastily patched up with band-aids, popsicle sticks, and used gum from the bottom of a high school desk. I don't think they could have completely dug themselves out of the hole that was Infinite, but they certainly could have done a better job than this.

One more year of polishing and the only flaw would have been the shitty story

The walking simulator part of Burial At Sea 1 was unironically the best part. Loved seeing Rapture in its heyday. After that it turns to absolute pigshit. The whole "Elizabeth found the code phrase" angle was atrocious and felt like a self insert fic. Retroactively adding new characters to the story of an earlier game has never, ever worked. Prove me wrong.
>Minerva's Den will live on as the best Bioshock DLC ever made

You could do that in AC Syndicate, all assassinations had unique stealth options and unique kills

really nigger? you think judgement is considered the worst after 4 and 5?