Ps5 OFFICIALLY $399

News is few hours old only

This is truly the end

Attached: Screenshot_20200330-162804_Chrome.jpg (720x1560, 476.84K)

end of what?

That would mean they make $000.00 USD per console and are banking entirely on their games'
sales.

F I V E N I G H T Y N I N E U S D O L L A R S

the end of Microsoft and faggotbox
Nobody will buy that 600$ trash

>Nobody will buy that 600$ trash
says who peasant?

Attached: question.gif (268x274, 1.03M)

It's because the PS5 is now subscription based. You're going to be spending at least a thousand a year on subscriptions, they have different packages some costing even triple the lowest subscription. There's subscription for the online service, subscription for access to games and subscription to play games early and subscription for exclusive DLC

Consoles are often sold at a loss, but this would be an unsustainable loss.

>selling at a loss
>sustainable
>breaking even on production cost
>unsustainable

Attached: 1507028100.gif (256x256, 352.1K)

There's no way $400 would be a break-even point for the PS5.

fucking this

why is hardware judged by price and not its weight ?
I have a normal job in east europe and I can afford every fucking thing

The end of a race of gamers who just like the plague humanity has been trying to end for decades

Attached: 1584567636300.gif (480x238, 443.4K)

If this is a real price, i guess they were smart people after all. But i will wait for official price reveal, okay mister tripfag?

Attached: shrug.png (300x238, 31.18K)

op picture has price for 1000$ and 400$

If PS5 is 400 and stronger than Lockheart than it's probably gonna win.

Xbox Series X being more powerful won't really matter much when exclusives are also going to be made for Lockheart, you're just gonna get stuff like some better resolutions and framerate. You won't get that obvious jump like between PS2 and the original Xbox.

>$600

I fucking hate being canadian

Attached: 157711295386981.jpg (326x215, 26.85K)

>not reading your own screen shot
>damage controlling the dead on arrival PS5

they're clearly banking on subscription services to make up the cost

And its probably right in between, selling for $800

More like they lose $200 per console.

I fucked up. I thought production costs were $400, but it looks like a number of places are reporting $450. $50 loss per console would fucking end their gaming division.

It would kill Xbox though, cementing PS5 as the sole hegemony of console gaming. They'll break even with people buying PS+ for at least 1 year.

haha ps4 money go bye bye

Attached: 4356345235.gif (673x379, 184.86K)

And what if its not a real price? Nothing will be cemented.

It would be far more than $50. If that $450 is in any way correct, it would probably not include taxes which are included in the $400 price tag.

>DOA PS5

lmao it’s gonna dominate just as hard as the ps4, are you high or something dude? Literally nobody gives a shit about the xbox, it won’t have a single exclusive just like the bone, everyone knows that too.
Pathetic gaslight attempt tranny, dilate.

because most people cant afford it or just dont want to spend more when they can get a similar product for 200 bux less

xbone was 100 bux more expensive than ps4 and no one bought it

post links faggot OP

Xbox BTFO, no way normies will pay an extra $200 to have to use proprietary SSDs and only an extra 1.7 teraflops that won't get used properly by multiplats.
Bloodborne 2, Gran Turismo, Last of Us 2, Spiderman 2, and timed FF7 parts exclusivity has more carrying potential than post-finishthefight-Halo and Forza.

>snoy censorstation employee who rides on gay parade floats calling others trannies
thats rich

>clearly a 5
>everyone calling it 399 instead of 599

desu it's probably still gonna cost 7k in denmark

Dilate and re-stitch, american negro

Attached: nintendo fans.png (1080x1209, 170.92K)

We're working with the real money, not monopoly toy money.

Have you ever heard of the PS3?

>proprietary SSDs
Literally just NVMe drives plus a heat sink.
>1.7 teraflops
2.8 plus VRS and SFS.
>inb4 b-but you can throttle the fuck out of the CPU and choke on memory bandwidth!

*ahem*
$399
*drops mic*

Attached: PS1 price announcement.jpg (1080x567, 60.9K)

Guess Sony loves losing money, even if they sell 50 million PS5 in 3 months, shit will tank their profits

I'll be surprised if it is that low but not that surprised. I could the faggots at Sony in California deciding to sell at a major loss because it's all about subscription. Not wrong, but they don't have the infrastructure for it. They're a generation behind Microsoft. I have both consoles and there is nothing appealing about the PS interface, internet, or game subscription. They would have to make major changes which knowing Sony won't happen.

They really think people will buy ps5 when they can play FIFA,COD,GTA,NBA on the ps4 for 200$ or less. LOL

>Yas Forums is too young to remember AT LEAST the PS3
Selling consoles at a lose was normal until this gen, the real money maker is on games and services.

>but muh Saturn VRAM. muh 32 channel sound. muh fillrate. Clearly the 1/3rd more expensive Saturn won't fail

Selling at a loss is nothing new, but 399 is really fucking low for what they apparently have in there for specs, that's a massive loss their selling at if that's true

>user is too young to remember the ps3 was a big flop at launch.

>and are banking entirely on their subscription """""services"""""
Fixed that for you.

God, I'm so scared for Sony. I wish they would triple their prices like Nintendo does. Then I could be a good goy.

its literally nothing in comparison with ps3, the ps5 is supposed to cost around $450 to manufacture, the ps3 was around $800 (in 2008) at release.

vdp2 fillrate was irrelevant the vdp1 fillrate was dreadful

idiots don't understand they make this 50 bucks by selling a game and online services, after that it's just profit

it's far more important to sony to ensure the console isn't doa due to being worse value than the competition and less appealing through that

not only that but the console can remain 400 bucks even when the manufacturing cost goes down

because it was $600 whereas you could get a 360 that would perform almost equally for $400. Sounds familiar?

MS is gonna lose a lot on money on the XSX isn't it? Selling a 56 CU card with RDNA2 worth at least $600-800 for $400 will be quite the steal.

Attached: kjrug7.jpg (720x720, 93.04K)

$397/£320
yeah right, we'll get fucked just like always and pay £399

One single year of PS+ sub mades for that loss

You're a special kind of stupid if you think one random retailer knows the price of an upcoming console before anyone else.

Taxes, packaging, transportation, one gamepad per console not accounted for, oh yeah and nobody forgot the fucking big one, ALL RETAILERS KEEP 30% OF SALES

>£320
Lmao never

xbox series x has a 7nm 350mm^2 soc while xbox one x has a bigger 360mm^2 16nm soc

I don't think the soc price will be much bigger if at all but of course the SSD and i/o will add to the price

Thats not fucked, knowing whats inside. Hell, £500 would be plenty. 1tb superfast ssd, zen 2 cpu, new rdna2 gpu etc

That's what they always do. They rarely make money off console sales until the second version of a console can be made more cheaply as tech has caught up and the parts are cheaper. Games, other media, and various deals are what keep Game Consoles going. And by games I don't entirely mean sales, I mean more particularly publishers paying to exist on the platform.

But that's not why

It's going to be $599 while xsex will be $399 and cheaper because Microsoft can afford it unlike Sony who's bleeding money.