Attached: 343096-pandaren-at-the-beginning.jpg (1050x768, 235.6K)
Was Pandas really the start of the downfall for WoW?
Elijah Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jonathan Gonzalez
No, it was cata. It has always been cata. Wrath was fine. BC was fine. It was cata.
Hudson Parker
Not pandas themselves, but Siege of Orgrimar went on way too long only for us to then get the worst expansion in history as the follow-up, and Hellfire Citadel as a raid echoed the SoO problem, so there's that. Things just fell apart from there, with the mission table somehow still being used even in BfA, an endless grind in the form of AP, randomness out the ass on gear itemization, way too many things hidden behind reps and stuff like Pathfinder, etc.
Joshua Clark
>Wrath was fine
Wrath was the start of the downfall for WoW. Easy heroics, no raid progression, lfg, shop mounts.
Early Cata was pretty damn good actually.
Asher Rivera
Pandaren themselves and Pandaria were the last piece of engaging content Blizzard could consistently write. It was only as the expac, like every other, went on way too long the death bells sounded for WoW
Landon Kelly
>tfw no panda gf
Eli Price
No, blood elves were.
James Wright
In terms of game mechanics, it was Wrath.
In terms of story, it was WoD.
Ryder Martinez
This
Nothing crushes your spirit quite like the streets of Orgrimmar filled with bouncing little queers that would have otherwise rolled Alliance
Julian Flores
MoP was great