The difficult moral choice of killing children, or not

Only short term.
You get almost the same amount after saving 3 and even some tonics iirc

You end up with more Adam over the course of the game because you get gifts left by the girls full of the shit and occasionally with unique plasmids and tonics.

>The moral choice of nuking a city for no reason, or not.

Attached: f3 megaton.jpg (1728x1080, 979.92K)

they still end up compensating you later because the little girls end up giving you gifts i think

basically you still get the same amount although its more of a "now or later" kind of game balancing thing

It's basically just a trap for edgelords. You get more Adam from harvesting a little sister instead of rescuing them. But if you rescue them, they later give you presents that contain even more Adam than you would've gotten from harvesting, and plasmids, making it overall better with no downside.

why would you use the pic from the porn animation instead of the game?

Attached: e82ec9391f25fe8f72b792e2d05d5d7825d9e6f63faa40b42bf465e7af8ba645.png (1000x1000, 694.23K)

That's the bioshock 2 intro tho

it's not for no reason you get a sick crib at the top of 5 star hotel with clean running water

I killed all those abominations.

>Best ending only comes if you kill children
Fuck you game.

i've seen too many little sisters take it up the ass to tell the difference

i dont remember the animations using that kind of model tho

they still use that fucking ugly as shit model

Bioshock gives you the choice to murder little children so you can get your paycheck cashed in a day early. It's laughable.

>Fallout 3
>Either pass a single skill check for a massive Karma Boost a free house etc
>Or blow up the entire town and soft lock you out of several of the early game quests in exchange for an apartment from george soros
>Fallout 3 endgame
>Literally save the world with no negative repercussions
>Kill everyone like literally just everyone

Attached: GigaByte.jpg (758x644, 63.77K)

the harvest options rewards arent really that competitive desu
maybe it harvesting gave you exclusive stronger plasmids, itll be worth it

You get more than enough adam to upgrade pretty much everything even before you start getting the save bonuses as well.
It's not very well thought out.

Noooo not le kidderinos not the lolirinos

This is literally every RPG in the past 20 years. There are no real difficult choices. It's just a bunch of extremely easy ones made to make you feel like a good guy

What do you think of this hard moral choice?

Attached: 20160904005510_1-1024x576.jpg (1024x576, 37.76K)

Chloe. Who gives a shit about the city? May as well save that sweet lesbian ass.

ya this was pure cringe.

youtube.com/watch?v=Q8lngIFXRi4&t=160
It's from this launch trailer.

i have a deep-seated hatred for chloe so even though i dont care about the city, i couldn't bear to let chloe live

Even if there is the evil route, it has less content than the good one.

they should make so there's no benefit in saving them, if you're doing it for the benefits it's not really a moral choice

It IS a very hard choice; which is worse? For Chloe to live or to NOT get the satisfaction of destroying that whole shitty city?

Kill Chloe, fuck that stupid cunt

Is there a single game with a good morality system? They're always 100% shit.

Chloe was a fucking stupid cunt with a dumb teenager rebellious streak that led her to do retarded things at every opportunity. Was unironically a better person in the wheelchair timeline.
Save the town with 0 hesitation.

This. At MOST it goes from "you can side with the good guys OR the sort of gray area guys (which most time are still just evil but human)"

Seriously. Are there any actually deep and difficult choices in any game?
Cheap endings don't count.

What's the point of games having this "difficult moral choice" and in the end it never really matters?

>Are there any actually deep and difficult choices in any game?

VNs are full of them

Attached: CHOOSE.png (1200x1697, 712.49K)

>killing and harvesting children purely for more atom
>you get more for saving them anyway
fuck you

they're not little children though are they retard, they're fucking ungodly abominations, you wouldn't need to pay me to kill those horrors

>Porn animation
Christ user where have you been?

If you're playing the game without foreknowledge of how it works, then saving them is the moral choice because you're knowingly taking less of a reward to save a child.

You do get benefits later on, but you wouldn't know that when you made the choice.

>shitty city
I ALWAYS read this excuse when it comes to Life Is Strange, even more so by those who save Chloe, despite the place not being any different or special in any way to any other city. Can someone point out why this place deserves to die? If it's so bad you are okay with saving Chloe, then the place never deserved to exist in the first place.

>evil route cut due to time constraints

Attached: 14100533_1149742388404633_1526239846411712885_n.jpg (552x561, 20.91K)

Right is literally me except I don't use social media of any kind.

Sandbox games are the ones ones with real moral choices right now

You haven't had a moral dilemma until you've infiltrated an enemy corporation in EVE Online over the course of 6 months, become close friends with most of the corp members and secured a leadership position, and now you have access to the corp hangars and have to decide whether or not you want to take everything

Where's the harem option?

Attached: 1560103044951.png (349x301, 97.22K)

london.

london...

Attached: 1574149343782.gif (428x424, 47.42K)

Attached: doom_toast.jpg (500x364, 70.03K)

This but unironically.

Attached: video game threads.jpg (749x746, 71.49K)

If you played Bioshock you would know that saving them means saving them and giving them a second chance at a fullfilling life, becoming their lovely father and raising into proper women with happy lives, and they all love you so much they accompany you until the day you die

It is pretty dumb, but the part that really annoyed me was that I couldn't kill Lamb in 2 unless I killed at least one of them.

That's good too but I want a loli wife

Attached: 2dde4444d783fcad8ebe9c23e1900907.jpg (320x480, 42.72K)

i didn't see that option when i played

any pixiv links of that gameplay?

I think he means as a guy user

>Harvest them for Adam
>Or spare them and receive 80% of the Adam as a gift later

>>Kill everyone like literally just everyone
the pure blooded Aryans would live

saving Chloe is selfish, she's entitled brat and her life doesn't equal to lives of everyone Arcadia Bay who were also shitty people but some of them were alright

Well, while it is pretty, thanks to the game's visuals being pretty good imo. The city is just...urgh, iunno, there just isn't a single likable person in the whole city, most of them are just outright annoying, and the rich people are in the "I can bring a gun to school, point at someone and get away with it" level of bastards, so that's always fun.
If Stardew Valley gave me a "if every inhabitant of this city died it would be more fun" vibe, then I would definitely think it's a shitty city. Even if some fucker was WAY worse than the whole city combined.

It's a difficult choice because, well, you can either cure the world of a BUNCH of minor cancers or destroy one BIG one. Either way, we still have a problem.

>kill the worst character in the whole game
damn, such a hard choice

I remember this same joke but dolan.

Attached: agXnQRW_700b.jpg (700x649, 62.98K)

BUT MUH LESBIANS. Everyone always says this, not that they like the character, that they like the idea of her lezzing out with that little boy

i'm a yurifag and even i couldn't stomach putting max with that wretched piece of shit