>FOUR (4)
>FUCKING
>DAYS
Bannerlord
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
forums.taleworlds.com
twitter.com
And still not going to buy that shut until napopan wars 2 comes out so eat shit.
Cant wait
So?
It'll be like the first one all over again: pile of shit that needs an "updated expansion" like Warband to be fucking playable
no way
really?
what factions are you rolling?
i was going to do Battania but holy shit archers are bad now
After all this time I don't think I'm going to buy it on release. I'm going to wait and see if it is a shitty bugged out mess like I'm afraid it will be before buying.
>FOUR (4)
>FUCKING
>DAYS
*plus one year
I personally bless all of you not to die of corona before we get to play bannerlord.
and 3-4 more years for all the actually promised content
I WILL RESTORE THE EMPIRE
RESTITVTOR ORBIS
HAIL AVRELIAN!
So you didn't play the first one at launch right?
Depp potted?
just play holdfast
Wait what? It's getting released? What the fuck?
Will mods be available during EA?
I have an innate aversion to games on early access but I might break it for Bannerlord.
It's gotta be almost done right? Did they mention how many features still aren't in it?
FIFTY DOLLARS FOR EARLY ACCESS
>he thinks it's gonna be released
>yesterday you pirated flower pots with my mom
thanks user, she had fun.
Worried about the price more than anything, its still in early access and its going to cost as much as a retail game. I cant see any other reason why they wouldnt have allowed pre orders and even a price estimate. If its too much Im just going to leave it till its in a sale, its literally Warband with better graphics and no mods, Im in no rush.
>linking to reddit
Common annon we want to clean this board with cancer and you give us that shit
Probably. There's some mods for the beta. You'll just be limited since tools won't be officially released but anything that can be cobbled together without them should work.
it will be full price from the get go. the storepage literally says they're not changing the price after ea.
Yep. Tuesday.
is that grenade live
Nah man, it's a photo.
Warband didn't need anything you fucking retarded zoomer
POINT AT THIS MAN!
POINT AT HIM AND LAUGH!
My dick ic constantly erected and i cant even call an ambulance because coronafags!
wake me up when pendor/gekokujo mods are done
I DON'T BELIEVE YOU AHHHHHHHHHHH
IT'S ALMOST HARVESTING SEASON
I'M NOT ALLOWED OUTSIDE, BUT I HAVE THE URGE TO HARVEST AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
All the hype is gone from teasing for too long. I used to be really excited but in the meantime finished master studies, finished phd and whole studio couldn't make fucking video game in all those years.
>its literally Warband with better graphics
Better engine with 1000+ unit battles:
youtu.be
Better sieges:
youtu.be
Dynasty system with aging:
youtu.be
Unit formations:
youtu.be
Unit splitting and merging:
forums.taleworlds.com
Who here /piratingday1buyingthemomentitcomesoutofearlyaccess/
WAITED 8 YEARS AND MY LAPTOP DOESNT EVEN MEET MINIMUM REQUIRMENTS
Yeah because Warband was the updated expansion you fucking retarded retard.
My PC didn't meet minimum requirements so I went and bought a few parts and now it does. Being a laptopfag must suck.
Warband was like the "Definitive edition" of the OG Mount & Blade
What if the singleplayer is bad
>LAPTOP
In the worst case scenario It'd just be Warband + better graphics & sieges and Dynasty System
how much is it gonna cost?
50 euro
Honestly, the graphics being better is a major downside. It just means it will be that much harder to run the game, and probably completely impossible to actually get anywhere close to a decent battle size.
Should have just stuck with the graphics of the first one.
Not exactly user. You have to consider that the first game's engine was pretty much haphazardly put together which led to its pretty bad optimisation. Better engines can lead to better render pipelines resulting in better visual quality and better performance at the same time. Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal look and run considerably better than RAGE did to this day.
lmao you poor nigg?
>probably completely impossible to actually get anywhere close to a decent battle size.
Thanks to the new engine you can actually have 1000-2000 unit battles without having them to respawn in waves like in Warband: youtu.be
I'm hoping sieges turn out better than a handful of archers defending the walls and both sides just balling up at the gate, eventually.
ok, with what specs? Because I can run warband with the battle size capped out, hell, even extended with mods, on a fucking potato. If you need a fucking thousand dollar graphics card just to hit ~100 units then you can eat my ass. Hell, if you need a thousand dollar graphics card to run it at absolute max the game will be a complete failure in my eyes.
>It just means it will be that much harder to run the game, and probably completely impossible to actually get anywhere close to a decent battle size.
for you
>games should all be made intentionally as limited as possible so toasters can play them
it worked for dark souls 2, r-right?
No. but you shouldn't sperg for graphics, and waste what... five years? On them. when they won't matter at all, and literally only serve to make the game worse.
A first person shooter game, needs good graphics, the ability to accurately see everything in the area, and instantly recognize and understand what it is, is fucking IMPORTANT in a FPS.
NOT in a strategy game, especially one that's going to be a gargantuan ram hog anyway.
Given the new siege mechanics, It's already miles better than warband sieges
>All those anons who died before Bannerlord comes out