Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: hqdefault[1].jpg (480x360, 19.49K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/bSiEB64FyF8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

the knight
potion seller has the right to sell his potions to whoever he wants

but he is going into battle

Enough of these games! Potion Seller was a rascal and his business model clearly isn't sustainable

>Can just sell retard a potion he wants and let him get rekt if he wants it so much
>Miss good profit opportunity to save him
Potion seller is more virtuous than 99% of real and imaginary merchants

What kind of knight needs potions to even just go into battle?

Even if he were going into battle, the seller's potions would be useless if they were too strong for the knight.

So? There must be at least a dozen potion sellers. He should go buy them somewhere according to his power.

It's his business. If he wants to go bankrupt, then it's his prerogative.

The potion seller is WRONG and that's a FACT.
He is CRAVEN and RUDE.
The Knight is BRAVE and JUST in his doings.

The knight. He was nearly brought to tears just by having a potion seller refuse to sell him potions. A knight of that limited capability could surely not handle potions strong enough to kill dragons. Even if he were using the potions specifically to kill the dragons, a knight so weepy would surely never get close enough to use it. No, the potion seller tested his mettle and found him sorely wanting, and rightly refused his potions.

Attached: 1tJoOZS.gif (210x193, 498.94K)