Words that make you ignore a review:

>idiot steam fanboys who actually use their review system have valid opinions

problematic

Fun

>antiquated
>the test of time
>"linear" used as a negative unless the game promised to not be linear

Attached: 1541709182309.png (404x386, 329.92K)

Any
Fucking
Review
That complains about additional content
When it's entirely optional
And exists just to be a fun thing for people to do if they want
Completely optional added content that doesn't hurt the core gameplay in any way is just a bonus holy fucking shit

Attached: Spongebob disdain.jpg (1024x923, 162.49K)

Fun

Dope

>Welcome to the Game Dungeon

its like the [completely unrelated game] of [reviewed game's genre that may also be said unrelated game]

>too video-gamey

Attached: 1584484361416.png (640x480, 518.27K)

TOXIC

Clunky means something user. I'm sorry your favorite game got called clunky, I'm sure the reviewer was a retard, but it's a real word, and a useful one.

Immersive

>invalidating a whole review over 1 (one) word
No wonder you fags don't like anything.

Attached: 1578619231593.jpg (340x565, 55.94K)

REVIEW

Maybe they're hating
Cuz it's time you'll waiting
For the sequel release date and
Less core dev participating

Inclusive.

> mad about a genre name
retarded
> mad about a meme subsubgenre descriptor
acceptable
> mad about a literal meme nobody uses
i laff'd

>it’s fun

Enjoyable

diverse

who tf says underbound and what do they even have in come aside from undertale ripping mothers essence

nobody, user
nobody does
it's a meme

...

toxic

trans

>Sonic has too many friends

Attached: blackeye modern.png (368x478, 213.09K)

only based person itt

>The

Attached: Sweetie4.png (728x899, 235.7K)

spbp

>I wanted to love this game. I really did.

Attached: 31231.jpg (805x953, 49.94K)

>optional content is part of the game
>DUHH STOP REVIEWING THE ENTIRE GAME DUHHH ONLY REVIEW THE THINGS I LIKE
If it's part of the game, no matter if it's optional or not, it can be reviewed, dumbass.

>As a fan of the series, blah blah blah
>personal history with the series ends up longer than the actual review

>Review scores down the game because it doesn't do something the reviewer "expects it to do" that has nothing to do with the core gameplay

Attached: 1584591096718.jpg (672x676, 62.01K)

If the reviewer has proven themselves to have good taste then this is unironically a godsend.
Or if it's scoring down a "sequel" that fails to deliver on the original's greatness.

>As a ____

I guess I'm more thinking along the lines of shit that is completely outside the box of what the game is meant to be offering, like Sekiro not having difficulty settings or pic related. Shit that has absolutely no relation with the main piece the game offers but apparently is worth getting upset by sheer nature of it not existing.

Attached: 1581838250004.png (792x652, 564.47K)

Oh yeah, that's obvious horseshit.
I think your point should be more like
> Review scores down the game for its failure to meet some completely arbitrary condition not advertised nor expected by the game

Ah yeah, that's a far better way of putting it.

>not ignoring all reviews
Why the fuck do you need other people to tell you whether or not you'd like a video game? Surely you play enough games to know what you would and wouldn't like?

Attached: 1384554969470.jpg (372x260, 21.38K)

Here's my shittiest take

The dreamcast is more powerful and has better hardware than the PS2, while also having a comparable library to it despite how much bigger the PS2 library is. Not to mention how much the PS2 held back other platforms at the time as well since it was such a weak piece of shit. We would have been better off if the PS2 wasnt so shit hardware wise, even if we gave up some of it's library as a cost of this changed timeline. If it wasnt for the contract being favorable, being a DVD player thats cheap (and played games) it wouldn't have been nearly as successful and that would have been beneficial in the end.

Fuck the PS2. Fuck the majority of it's library. I suck Sony's dick day and night but I will never defend this piece of shit

Attached: 1566906580342.png (2360x1440, 2.02M)

At what point does playing video games make you clairvoyant, able to tell what a game feels like to play?
You can watch videos all you want but a game can look much better than it plays.

Clunky is well deserved for shit like dark souls 2, how a game can feel more clunky than its predecessor is beyond me

weight
floaty

>floaty

Less a word, but when evil reviewer shows up I find someone else to watch.
I can't stand that cringy shit.

>Controversial

Attached: 1583812627329.jpg (474x474, 18.17K)

Clunky just means when controls aren't responsive.

>floaty

The difference between Smash Bros Melee and Brawl.

lewd

>Too easy

Because they might have interesting insight into the game and are good at explaining why it's a good game?

Omnidirectional rolling alone makes DS2 feel smoother than DS1, for any of the other complaints you can lay on it.

Formerly responsive