Based Gaben slaying the Yas Forumstard tourists, SJWs and nVidiots in one quick swing

?

but that's a good thing as it shows instantly how much user didn't like the game (and, if there are actual points of argument on it - good)

t. always refund game i didn't like at all

If they cope, they won't seethe any more.
But seriously, I don't get the connection between OP's post and pic.

¿

Attached: ¿.jpg (522x269, 23.67K)

Makes sense. Between two negative reviews, one marked as "refunded" with 1,5 hours of play time and second with 250 hours of play time, the latter is somewhat less credible in describing the game as "bad".

?

?

Are you retarded. It doesnt matter if 2 hours or 2000 hours theres no rule that defines how many hours you need for a based review.

?

Attached: 1533603156149.gif (202x360, 1.84M)

weird thought process there, just because a guy plays a game for hundreds of hours doesn't mean he can't come to hate it.

?

pro customer/ pro human policies are a left wing thing though... So righties btfo then?

Not OP but each review has how many hours the user has put into the game and whether they returned it or not
During the Ion Fury debacle Yas Forums and Yas Forums bombarded the review section just because the developers were going to remove some out of bounds text that said fagbag

I'm more mad about the character being blasian, black guys can't have all women

every group I've mentioned is known to buy a game they never gave a fuck about, leave a negative review about drama that you don't like and then refund the game. This will show to everybody else that you're a clown.

>Positive review
>"GREEEAT GAME BOOIS!"
>Product refunded

yes there is - if someone has played 200hrs and then put out a bad review then 99.9999% of time it's a salty oldfag / early adopter, pissed off by a re-balance a casual might not even give a shit about.

not gonna happen - shill reviews are made from free keys, given away by dev.

>someone says a game is good but they refunded it
Instantly disregarded
>someone says a game is shit and they refunded it
Supports their point

Attached: 1579786413222.jpg (637x486, 42.91K)

?

Well, if he started to hate it after 250 hours, I'm pretty safe to try it, as I'm not autistic enough to sink that much time into one game. And as a fan of jrpgs I am quite autistic.

?

Fuck YOU nigger some updates break games or sometimes they add faggy launchers suck dick nigger

Seems they're slowly updating the store pages, they also changed the check mark on languages available for a game.

>thread doesn't go exactly as he envisioned in his half-eaten brain
>gets upset

the worst offender is when negative review says something along the lines of "it gets repetitive / boring". Like, no shit, retard - you've played this game for weeks now!
There are, of course, more valid points (when dev cuts out / censors content after a fact or they add some drm thing, but that rarely happens)

you have to be 18 years or older to post here

fucking rockstar games. i hope they burn in hell for making eflc and gta iv useless

I don't understand. Someone doesn't like a random game so they left a negative review and got it refunded? That's hardly worth making a thread over.

?

also preferably white

?

an other proof game companies and indie developers shill on Yas Forums

Attached: 1575874601854.jpg (1024x683, 94.66K)

You mite be retarded lol

?

>"it gets repetitive / boring". Like, no shit, retard - you've played this game for weeks now!

That's a completely fine thing to say for many live service games though.

Proclaiming that you can't hate a game because you played it a lot has to be the most braindead take on this website.

Attached: consume_product.jpg (1916x945, 237.79K)

Of course you can hate it, but it couldn't have been so bad.

you can do anything - doesn't make a review of someone who would play hundreds of hours without not enjoying it, at least, half of that time, any more useful for a potential new customer, who might be happy with a fraction of that playtime.

>without not enjoying it,
*without enjoying it

>Gaben
>based
chose one

>mention in the review that I refunded it
>don't refund
>buy all DLC instead
INSANE IN THE BRAIN

The game is bad
>YOU ONLY PLAYED 1.5 HOURS! HOW CAN YOU KNOW IS BAD?
The game is bad
>BUT YOU PLAYED 250 HOURS! HOW CAN THE GAME BE BAD IF YOU PLAYED IT SO MUCH

uh i would say the opposite

some retard who played through half of the tutorial has no standing to call a game good or bad

some games only get good after 100 hours, but they stay great for a really long time after

Insane in the membrane

?

You mean like how WC3 Reforged also broke the original WC3 client even for those people who never paid for Reforge?

He kinda does, you just have to weigh that review against people who played longer.
It's an early indication of design choices.

?

no, anyone who quits that early is adhd and didn't even experience the game for whatever reason

Fuck, you're right. I guess the only reviews left are the ones made by professional journalists then. :^)

?

>buy game
>see black character
>refund because it won't work
IN THE WHITE ROOM WITH BLACK CURTAINS NEAR THE STATION

Attached: 1581364425996.jpg (1024x1021, 63.54K)

But nobody gives a shit what they think

as i've already mentioned here

>playing a game for hundreds of hours that you don't like
Why do you hate yourself so much?
>YOU ONLY PLAYED 1.5 HOURS! HOW CAN YOU KNOW IS BAD?
It's the people who say this that are retarded. A game that "gets good after 20 hours" is shit

imagine having someone live in your head this rent free