Cyberpunk 2077

WHY DID I MOVE HERE?

I guess it was the weather

Attached: cyberpunk2077-get-off-my-property-rgb-1.jpg (1600x900, 373.6K)

Attached: 1546828285023.gif (340x223, 1.99M)

>different game
That trailer isn't a game at all. It's a piece of animated concept art of a project that wasn't even in development at the time that was released to attract job applicants. No shit the game would look different almost 10 years later.

I can already see Yas Forumstards and Yas Forumstards making webms of shooting pregnant women in Cyberpunk2077 in the spirit of the Watchdogs webms.

there won't be any actual pregnant women in-game for this very reason. she's just for the trailer

It transformed to this

Attached: CyberYikes_2077.webm (1920x1080, 680.59K)

looks good

for 2008

all you had to do was follow the damn cyberblimp cj

all i want to do is go from being a piece of thug trash to working for the megacorps and actually making something of myself
if i have to screw over all of my friends and allies i'll be happy to do it, especially that fat fuck who hangs out with you
nothing worse than when a game tries to sell you on who your friends are from the start
i don't even fucking know you people
its like waking up from a coma with amnesia and dudes just piling in like yo bro welcome back we missed you do you remember that one time
no, fuck off

the HUGE success of GTA5 and witcher3 convinced shareholders to put pressure on cdpr.
thats why they're pushing multiplayer and mainstream appeal to the max.
"pure" RPGs will never sell as much as action games (with rpg elements), so we're here.

It looks like halo 2

This trailer will show up on a random tv in a shop somewhere in the background as an easter egg. Mark my fucking words

>This old chestnut
No, they had some sort of internal issues that put the game into development hell.

>old trailer
>Art style is a bit too ghost in the shell for me, but I appreciate that things have a sleek utilitarian look, helping flesh out the world
>New trailer
>Shitty music kicks in
>WAGANAH WAGANAH WAH WAH
>Welcome to fag city. It's home to some of the most pointlessly glowing guns, clothes, and electronics.
>Everyone here is in a cyberpunk universe and they know it, hence the fact that everything glows like someone shat glitter on it.
>Heh, what for? No reason, just stupid aesthetics

what GTA SA mod is this

Attached: 1579477963271.png (1128x180, 57.18K)

Yeah, that's pretty sad

Amazing what those Brazilian modders can do with San Andreas.

Noooo why does my PUNK game have liberal elements

I'm gonna play the shit out of this game and never have anyone to talk about because you people are a bunch of fags looking for TORtanic 2.0

The game is completely cringe. Cyberpunk is the original teaser trailer. This, le 56%, shaven head, sunglasses, ghetto shit, "LET'S GET RID BRO" shit is terrible.

Attached: t48VuoG4vDJdTzUWaL8pjF.jpg (1280x720, 174.02K)

Because when the genre was created, being a body mutilating tranny wasn't seen as a good thing, it was seen as a sign of the times. Of insane people trying to redefine humanity.

>rid
rich*

It's cringe how much a game that is supposedly about the future is influenced by and clearing catering to twitter and red shit

>Implying the muttification of the US isn't a key cyberpunk element

Basically any cyberpunk universe has the US and entire first joining the third world. Blade Runner predicted the racial replacement of white people in california like 20 years before it happened.

Normalfags happened. Enjoy your cyberpunk San Andreas.

>trusting the same developers that ruined Saints Row 2 on pc

Attached: 1584424885530.png (900x900, 522.25K)

Internal issues like making Witcher 3, plus its dlc.

>What is having multiple studios
Announcing a game, then postponing it's development by more than half a decade sounds like a fuck up to me, user.

Not if you're releasing it to attract talent to your studio. CDprojekt didn't even have Witcher 3 money back then. Even now they announced recently they're going to start work on Witcher 4 AFTER Cyberpunk is done. That's how that studio works. That's how most studios work.

I don't really care though. Games are a means to escape reality. This is how I envision a cyberpunk game. Also, it's pretty messed up that searching cyberpunk only gives you this shitty cringefest of a game now.

Attached: b32884e5c6f915a0190a8217798f877b.jpg (1276x1651, 469.16K)

Holy shit how did I never notice this.

Attached: alt.jpg (1088x964, 242.04K)

>all the witcher games were shit
>people expected this to be good

The witcher games were not shit

>1: bad gameplay, just watch an LP to experience the decent story
>2: bad gameplay, just watch an LP to experience the decent story
>3: bad gameplay, just watch an LP to experience the decent story

Depressing

or you know dont watch it at all if you are not interested

people watching other people play videogames on youtube are subhuman

"People" playing Bitcher are subhuman

Kinda ruins the role playing element of being a hired monster hunter if you go cutscene to cutscene like that.

1 was pretty shit gameplay wise, 2 and 3 was fine. Maybe if you went past normie difficulty you would see the fun behind preparing for a monster fight, or needing spirits to regain potions.

>pick choice a or choice b (neither matters)
truly I am missing out on so much

>2 and 3 was fine.
the combat sucks and it got even worse in 3 with the cancerous level system where everything with a higher level takes 2 hours to kill and everything with a lower level dies instantly

2 was the right balance. Shit could kill you quick but you could kill shit quick. Movesets and positioning were most important. Enemies didn't "Wait in line" to attack and you could get your shit pushed in at any point in the game.
3. dumbed down the enemies (even though it's the same combat system and movesets) and made everything a "bullet sponge".

The only enemies even approaching witcher 2 quality were the spiders in the Hearts of stone expansion - and only on deathmarch difficulty, otherwise the game was made for Skyrim karens.

Success breeds mediocrity in AAA gaming.

No it's not about that, the choices are more to make whatever version of geralt you have in your mind reflect what's happening in the plot. No what I mean is preparing potions crafting oils reading up on what monster you are killing investigating that kind of thing. That and deciding when and where to do random jobs just puts you into that blue collar monster slayer role if you buy into it, which you don't. I mean that's fine, roleplaying requires a little imagination. Not all games need to be like that, doom is coming out and that's mechanically heavy and all is required of you as a player is to not take hell invades the earth seriously and mechanical mastery. RPGs, especially western crpgs, ask you to invest and pretend a little more which, clearly, is something you don't appreciate.

>LARPING in a video game

Attached: hinako reaction image 3.png (799x765, 704.73K)

Yes, role playing in a role playing game. Imagine that.

This place is going to be a salt mine when the game comes out. Its going to be unusable because of the kiddies looking for the next TORtanic.

You can't roleplay in a video game that cannot acknowledge your actions

>demo
>demo
>demo
>demo

Attached: v the bird.jpg (414x279, 68.07K)

I have the lowest expectations for this game and likely won't spend alot of time on Yas Forums once it actually drops. All I want is a virtual night city to tour around and get a chance to talk to Johhny Alt and morgan. If they can do that it'll be a 10 for me.

Since when? The satisfaction of role playing can be purely intrinsic. If I decide to go to Dandelion's cabaret and read books while consuming spirits for no reason other than, to me that's the action I want to play out in this world then that's roleplaying.