What would a Catherine game for women be like?

why did you make it personal dude i was just asking a question.
i don't know why you're so mad

Attached: 1583893068414.png (200x300, 15.68K)

one is a simple loss of control the other is a betrayal

whyd you post a picture of yourself?

One is a fantasy/fetish, the other is a nightmare scenario.

One scenario results in her making a lot of money from her new sugar daddy. The other does not, unless she gets a rape-kit and sues the guy; in which case, she makes money either way.

>Isn't that what Fifty Shades of Gray was?
I haven't read the book but from what I've been told of the plot it starts with her being infatuated with the guy and being used as a sexual plaything by him but then she gets over it and it becomes about him falling in love with her and desperately pursuing her. It's apparently ultimately a female power fantasy, not a female subservience fantasy.

looks like she's also making shittons of money living in your head rentfree

Who cares not even roasties would want to play a game this boring.

An office woman approaching 30 realizes she is terrified of commitment and lowering her standards to actually approach and meet anyone as a self defense mechanism against realizing she's probably a terrible person. One of the nightmare bosses is a colossal wall.

Attached: 1538222378424.jpg (400x533, 35.01K)

It' be this.

Attached: 1575288550386.png (778x960, 989.22K)

A game where a woman cheats on her boyfriend with another woman.

...How can she be making money in that scenario? I mean, even if she isn't paying rent, she isn't actually making money. Fuck user, I get that you want to white-knight for a hypothetical woman in a hypothetical video game involving a hypothetical situation, but at least use your memes properly.

Climbing stacks of veiny thick BBCs.

Attached: klassicheskie-match-3-1.jpg (704x524, 121.01K)

It is a very basic logical conjecture that not paying one of the conventionally obligatory expense for essentials such as lodging, then you are profiting through being able to invest those funds elsewhere. I know cranking logic and putting 1's and 1's together is hard when your pitiful collection of brain cells are busy regurgitating hypothetical scenarios featuring hypothetical women cucking you or doing hypothetical things that make your inverted chin recoil in fear.

It would have a large horror element.

Video games are for boys. Women should go do something else. Cook. Clean. Anything but play video games.

I want a manga about this.

Probably something like vampire diaries desu

No, it's not logical at all. Now you are insinuating she has an external income and is apparently investing in profitable returns. All we have established is that she is living in a location without the need to pay rent. This is what niggers do, courtesy of the state, and they make no money. You have completely skipped the critical step in which we establish that she is doing anything to generate profit, beyond my scenario that she may or may not be profiting as a tactical rape victim, and have misused a meme out of its original context, in a logically falsifiable way, to white-knight for said fictional woman in said fictional video game in said fictional scenario.

Yes, it is as a matter of fact very logical to assume someone who is capable of filing a lawsuit or attract a rich individual are infact capable individuals with some sort of median income that provides the basic framework for your hypothetical fictitious scenarios that your brain is preoccupied with to transpire. I will now refrain from indulging your mania because it appears you have been reduced to incoherent rambling and a faux sense of courtesy masking a fusion of anger, stupidity, unaware irony, all clouded by an atrocious lack of insight.

Adios, champ. May you win all the fictional battles that rage inside your head, and may your attention be never diverted from the imaginary women doing imaginary appalling things in their imaginary worlds you concoct during your daydreams.

Its basically
>He was so overcome by his lust for me that he raped me!
>But after he raped me he saw me as more than a sex subject and fell in love with me!
I've read at least 20 shoujo manga with this exact premise. Half of those by ikeyamada go.

Easier

holy fucking based

Girls fantasize about a certain type of rape from men they would already want to fuck anyway

A game whose story is written by Tooyama Ema where the lead has to pick between a douchebag she only recently met who treats her like shit and the childhood friend/nice guy who's tired of getting friendzoned and tries to rape her.

Have you seen Bridget Jones' Diary? It'd be like that.

This would probably work, the fear that she's over-idealised "romance" and the fear of "time-running out" spurring the conflict of "keep trying to find the knight in shining armour" vs "Give everybody a chance and maybe find happiness in unlikely places".
Could even have the same-style "neutral" end that K/Catherine did, where she decides that it's a nice fantasy, but decides that romance isn't necessary for her to live a fulfilling life.

Having to choose between a bad boy and a beta male.

It's both. The ultimate fantasy for submissive women is to be dominated sexually and treated decently outside of sex. It's a fantasy because that never happens in real life.

The idea of causing a man to lose control of himself is the "idea" behind it. It's about being desired to such extreme lengths that the man would do anything, which grows from inherently sexual to romantic as well.
It's why novels of the sort use language like "He couldn't keep his hands off of me", "his breath in my ear was harsh and animalistic", or "I'm sorry, but when you're around I sometimes do/say the wrong things...". To drive home the idea that the main character is so desirable that her mere presence can affect the love interest on a fundamental level.

Except Katherine was not about "choose C or K", it was about the meaning behind each choice.
What meaning is there behind Bad Boy/Beta that isn't just generic romance schlock? Wild dangerous lifestyle versus comfortable stability? The devil you know vs the devil you don't?

I still think they mixed up the design. Kat should have been the succubus not cat. At least in design.

>Wild dangerous lifestyle versus comfortable stability?
That's exactly the choice between C and K.

Basically
>Guy A
Boyfriend since high school whose a nice but boring guy who will make the heroine wonder if she's settling or if she genuinely loves him.
>Guy B
A rough man with a domineering personality who allows the heroine to cut loose in terms of sex and life.

would the puzzles still suck

women have absolutely shit spatial awareness, so what do you think? It'd probably have to be a 2D puzzler to make up for this fact.

Probably like every chick flick about love triangles

Sounds better than the puzzle games in Catherine. I never played a game and immediately thought
>this makes the water temple tolerable in comparison with its bullshit

As an emotionally stable adult woman I prefer media with a male protagonist because I long for that broship camaraderie that women seem incapable of sharing together.

Coombrain women are the majority and enjoy garbage media, just like coombrain men with their moeshit haram anime.

Why is it that women can't form casuals bonds like that to create a believable plot along the lines of an ocean's heist

Girls fantasizing about forced sex from their ideal man is very different from ugly fucks or stupid niggers raping them.

you have a stereotypical/TV idea of men if you think they have this camaraderie air to them. they can be manipulative, careless and double-faced too.

I honestly couldn't tell you. I was raised in isolation by a neglectful single mother and almost definitely have autism.

I do have one female friend, but she's dumb as a sack of bricks and I only interact with her because she accepts my eccentricities.

I never said that I believe it's a real-life phenomenon - We're talking about immersive fiction media, right?

What would "guy" Rin be like?

i wish there was a petplay otome game im tired of crap about princesses and inheritence

sounds like YOU probably have shit spatial awareness too.

Is the MC the pet, or the guys?

A masculine lesbian with a manjaw.

in a perfect world there would be two games where thr MC can be the pet and another where she is the mistress but if i had to choose one id choose the second. and youd have the option to be a loving mistress or a cruel mistress. im aware there are otome games where the MC gets demeaned but none of them ever stay in the petplay category

>spoiler
Have you ever been diagnosed by a professional? There’s a difference between Yas Forums ‘autism’ and actual autism, user.

I'm no master on the topic, but the trend I have noticed is that men just "hang out". My mother was always shocked that I can sit and play a game, or just talk, to some of my friends for hours and learn nothing about what's going on in their life.
Two hours of conversation completely summed up in "we had a fun chat".

This idea has been worthy of comment when I've mentioned it to women I know. Might have something to do with needing to feel like a connection is there, rather than just having someone to "talk shit" with. If they spoke to a "friend" for two hours and didn't learn anything about what's going on in her life, they would feel guilty that they are being selfish and not a good friend.

Armchair psychology over, Freud was wrong and I probably am too. Men and women stereotypically want/expect different things from "friendship", and as such require different levels of stimuli to create that sense of camaraderie.

The first rape is done by Gigachad.
The second is done by (you).

>tfw katherine convinced me to stop cheating
Great game.