So, what's the point of having a very fast SSD when only few first party games will use its potential?

There is no point, it's a marketing gimmick like Kinect was. Developers would rather milk all 3 platforms for money than specialize in one for no real reason.

This will either be the age of the exclusive where Sony throws ridiculous amounts of cash at companies to make games for them and snoyfags get some truly great games, or it'll be the age of the multiplat where there are no exclusives at all (and by extension, could mean either the death of the XBox, or the expulsion of Sony from the NA market).

as always the world strives to be better than the disgusting americans only to be dragged down by niggers spics and jews

AMD is an american company, how is America not involved in both the PS5 and Sex

my point stands even more so

If they both choose to use AMD, that isn't "striving for better" they would use a better non-American SoC if they were

CELL is a whole different ball of wax on so many level, so it's not really comparable, but yeah, not sure what they were thinking. Devs design for the what they're given, not what they want. They will not reciprocate any attempts at good will, so it's a poor choice. Game design will be limited (giving sony the benefit of the doubt that they have a legit boon here) by xbox, but graphics will be limited by ps5, and can always be increased on xbox. It's more of a lose-lose for sony, imo. Audio is the same. Personally, this is something I've wanted for a long time, but as has been seen over and over, no one gives a rat's tail about audio. They didn't for ps3, they didn't xbone, they won't for ps5.

i dont think you know what that word means

>an ssd being compared with a cpu

>striving
>make great efforts to achieve or obtain something.
You are implying American tech is holding back the consoles, that would suggest you think non-Americans can do it better. Yet without the American tech they would be weaker

>CELL is a whole different ball of wax on so many level, so it's not really comparable
saying "this reminds me of" isn't a comparison, a comparison would be to say

The cell's CPU was much stronger than the Xbox 360's but that didn't translate to much differences in games, most likely to keep the multi-plats in parity, so this will probably be similar in that the faster SSD of the PS5 probably wont result in games being that different on the PS5 and Sex to keep parity

Exclusives sell consoles and having outstanding and unique exclusives will certainly make you stand out compared to the competition. It's as if no one in Yas Forums understands business.

PS4 was a giga[ntic] flop so PS5 is tera flop

>still hasn't revealed the actual console or even controller
>M$ has revealed both + gameplay footage
fuck is you doin, sony

Attached: milk.jpg (573x457, 26.01K)

This whole thing is just baffling. Its like sony is a newcomer to the industry that doesnt know the more powerful console gets the games and the other one just shitty ports. Why aim for a gimmick that almost no one will ever use because why bother?

Shitty thing about the sony console losing is you have to sacrifice the exclusives because the only choice dumber than this one would be releasing those on pc at the same time.

>Most powerful console gets the games

Your underage is showing

To be fair they started development years ago, it isn't like they knew the Sex would have these specs, they learned the same time we did. You can only estimate so much in the future.

i cant wait to compare the games between sexbox and PS5

Also a month ago the argument could be
>you still have to get one because it has all those exclusives

Welp not anymore lmao. Who the fuck is making the decisions at sony right now? Setting precedent for your exclusives coming to other plstforms just before you reveal your new console? Are they actually fucking retarded?

It's literally the other way you fucking subhuman. Games are made for the lowest common denominator then ported to more powerful machines with minimal benefits.

>the fuck is a teraflop
It's what judges how powerful the graphical output will be, AKA how sharp the visuals are.
Ergo, XSeX = 12 & PS5 = 10.
12 > 10
Thusly, Xbox Series X will have more detailed graphics than the PS5. End of discussion.

>Truly utilize SSDs
What the fuck

>Yo PS5 I need to send a gorillion gigabytes to RAM
>PS5 does it in a second

>Yo SeX, I need to send a gorillion gigabytes to ram
>SeX does it in 2 seconds

You'll get barely noticeable longer loading screens, retards. It's not like every fucking gamedev has made long halways and shitty walking sections to mask loading.
"First parties" will just know exactly how long they need to make their shitty slow-paced walking section or elevator ride.

>Snoyggers shitposted for months about how X1 and Lockhart will hold back SeX
>now they are the ones with a system with clock speeds that could be anything at any time, meaning devs have to build games around the lowest clock speeds
Serves you fags right

>Port 1 game to pc
>PS HAS NO GAMES

Attached: 1571587308405.gif (413x243, 50.98K)

The weaker console only wins the gen when it is released comfortably before the other one, ps2 and xbox360 (not taking into account nintendo consoles because those sell banking on gimmicky toy like features that appeal to a whole different demographic and brand culstism and when they didnt have those like the wii u the console fucking flops)

We don't know the Lockhart specs though. It's likely it will be weaker than the ps5, so point still stands.

Only when the weaker console sells more you fucking retard the base ps4 is more powerful than the base xbox 1 so xbox 1 gets all the shitty ports

Ps5 will sell more than xsx.

>yfw Microsoft wasted money on petaflopshit and Sony is bottlenecking the generation.
Preorder PS5 Pro now!

>base ps4 is more powerful than the base xbox 1
That was debatable back then. According to MisterXmedia, the vanilla Xbox One was always more powerful than the vanilla PS4 due to the "secret sauce" on its chip set, but was being held back by the PS4 due to parity.

So Minecraft will have the sharpest pixels on the xcox?

Sony's been deceptive as fuck with their PS5.

First saying Teraflops don't matter (without mentioning that they do when comparing same uarch)

And then doing the asspull of fewer CUs being better for performance (but don't mention your thermals going haywire and RT implementation being garbage)

Make a big deal out of your customized SSD but really it's only "customized" because you needed something faster than SeX and it had to be the SSD since everything else was too hard to pull off.

Mark Cerny, your mother is rolling in her grave.

False.

PS4 games run always at bigger resolution than xbox games

Resolution gate almost killed the Xbox

>So Minecraft will have the sharpest pixels on the xcox?
Unironically, yes. Minecraft is the ultimate medium for testing visual fidelity.
>youtube.com/watch?v=agUPN3R2ckM

Time to fire this low-test hack. Bring back Crazy Ken.

Attached: ps4.mark_.cernyx392.jpg (392x392, 77.74K)

>reddit spacing

Attached: zed85.jpg (396x382, 40.92K)

The rate and mass at which a game console becomes a failure.

Attached: 1584398662300.png (750x744, 804.64K)

Threadly reminder the variable clock speeds will only be relevant on Photo Mode™ where they'll bring all their fancy raytracingshit.

Remember that time Mark Cerny claimed fewer CUs at retard clock speeds are better? I sure do.

That's not what he claimed at all, but sure.

It is the same excuse why every multiplat ran much better on the 360 and only exclusives were good on the PS3.

Their engineers try to come up with something because they overclocked the machine in the last minute from 9 to 10 to not look that bad compared to Xbox.

There genuinely is a benefit to the higher clocks vs greater parallelization, but it's not going to overcome a 20cu gap, nor does it consider a lot of specific cases that are highly parallelizable, like raytracing. PS5 may "punch above it's weight", but a featherweight is not going to beat a heavyweight.

Sony didn't give a fuck because they got away with the PS3 and the PS4. PS3 was all aorund shit but still sold eventually and PS4 was simply trash HW but MS spent all their dev money on that trash kinect.

This, except less autistic
We already know from this generation that specs are meaningless. Even between the PS3 and 360, the the 360 won despite being an objectively worse machine.

It happens every generation--hyping up features, flexing specs, and downplaying their competition, and people are idiots for still buying into it.

People should just build gaming PC's at this point. For a midrange PC, you're practically spending the same money upfront, if not less in the long run.

I dunno, it's easier to add cu, than come up with some sort of thermal/utilization load balancing algorithm. That's something I would expect after production is started, but that doesn't seem to be the case yet.

It's all pretty damn hilarious how so many people are buying snake oil with these consoles.

>NVME exist for years
>Booting and games are not impacted by NVME speeds
>Suddenly consoles are going to make games run at NVME speed or faster when the reality is they will hit 500mbs just like current NVME and SSD

WE CAN LOAD A 1440P GAME 0.13 SECONDS FASTER THAN SERIES X AT 4K 120 HAHA TAKE THAT!

Here's the rub. The TF difference means jackshit unless MS and Sony both put their dick on the table and say "any game you release on our platform has to be 60fps no matter the resolution. Anything lower and we won't let you."

Because if devs are basically racing to the bottom of 4K30 with drops, as has been the case of basically every preceding console generation:

>XBX: 480p30
>X360: 720p30 or less with drops
>X1: 1080p30 or less with drops

and

>PS1: 480p30 or less with drops
>PS2: 480p30
>PS3: 720p30 or less with drops
>PS4: 1080p30 or less with drops

Unless MSFT and SNY both say no more 30fps games on our console, the TF difference really doesn't fucking matter. PS5 will do medium-high textures, SeX will do High-Ultra textures with some slightly better lighting or alpha effects. Big fucking whoop.

Oh no no no its going to be the ps3 all over again and no devs will take advantage of it making it meaningless

30fps games will still be the norm for 'cinematic' games screencap this

This is not true. Don't believe this person
youtube.com/watch?v=TfTpJFxVjec

>port 1 game
>PS HAS NO GAMES

oh ok so

>horizon zero dawn
>detroit become human
>heavy rain
>beyond two souls
>nioh
>death stranding
>destiny 2 exclusive content
and many more is 1 game...

Attached: 1584549647897.jpg (615x344, 24.08K)

The "secret sauce" was 32 MB of ESRAM and hyping it up to be this magical super extra performance increaser is a giant fucking crock of shit. It was vaguely useful for some niche scenarios where you only needed to move around small amounts of data, but in no way, shape or form made up for everything else being slower and there's fucking good reason (such as being useless and making the silicon enormously more expensive) why it was dropped in the big boy high-performance X version.

twitter.com/dark1x/status/1240326663784869889
OH NO NO NO
HOW DO GITHUB CHADS KEEP ON WINNING?

But it is relevant when both use the same uarch
But then again since PS5 is RDNA1+/RDNA2- the TFLOPS actually make the PS5 look better than it is vs SeX

It is RDNA 2

Attached: 1584570460983.jpg (1080x1886, 563.3K)

>PCfags holding back gaming
Never thought I'd see it happen.