There's nothing wrong with changing or altering a game (aka what some of you call "censorship") if it removes...

and now we know you're just either baiting or too far down the rabbit hole.

What if we start changing more for the uncensored cishet version? Like what DOA6 did? They toned down the fanservice in the main game and started changing whales and coomers for the gross costumes haha

i have ejaculated countless gallons to the women in this game

Gross AF. Why not just look at porn then? Games should be about gaming first, not cooming.

>Women find sexualized women chars offensive
>Women find sexy characters offensive
No they don't. What you're talking about is feminists, and those are a small minority. Feminists are also insane.

Attached: 1519254855230.jpg (749x745, 160.76K)

Nonsense. Feminism is common in over 70% of younger people. Look up the stats.

to most people feminism doesn't mean stripping down and screaming pissing and shitting all at once
to most people it just means egalitarianism

>objectional content

Attached: 1326272340087.jpg (173x228, 9.63K)

Right EXACTLY! And that means getting rid of sexist and offensive shit like in the OP. Men don't get sexualized in games. It never happens. But women do. The cmaera is up their asses and shit. And don't even get me started on "jiggle physics" ugh. Men don't deal with dong physics so it's NOT equal.

You're trying too hard.

Man is showing more cleavage than any women in the game.

Attached: street-fighter-battle-costume-ryu.jpg (600x337, 97.77K)

That's been happening since the Xbox version of DOA4. There is a reason why they went for Xtreme Beach Volleyball.
Get fucked faggot.

>Men don't get sexualized
Men are way more sexualized than women. No one wants 3DPD not even faggots.

Attached: 1484938512848.jpg (1536x2048, 532.66K)

>Power fantasy

Yeah totally the same as the camera being up Juri's anus.

Juri is a powerful woman, fuck off

Ryu is the whitest japanese man to ever exist

Attached: INCEL FORCE.jpg (1058x366, 84.13K)

agreed. it helps me know what people and companies not to support.

The funny thing is most studies show women like to play as sexualized women more then anything else. hell woman or way more likely to pick there own gender when given the choice.

I would drnk all of their pee, all of it.

Ok simp

Nerf the tits and thighs.

>Feminism is common in over 70% of younger people.
>to most people it just means egalitarianism
You both live in a bubble.
lol.
You think you would, but you wouldn't.

Why?

I find gameplay objectionable content. I shall have it censored from all games. More people will buy them now since they don't have to put any effort into finishing the games.

Because she's shit.

Get snipped, bitchbaby.

go fuck yourself, you lunatic

Attached: female_wish_fulfillment.jpg (677x555, 106.61K)

Some random nobody's comment on kotaku? Ok.

I agree. It's gross desu and looks stupid AF. Real women don't have tits bigger than their head and thighs wider than their torsos.

here your (you) you disgusting whore

No NO NO! MY NARRATIVE NOO!!!!

Attached: 1584113886609.jpg (539x568, 25.17K)

As opposed to some random nobody's comment on Yas Forums?

I write articles for a major gaming site, so yea, whatever incel. lol

You forgot to mention women rarely buys games and only play mobile games so even if women did get offended it wouldn't increase the sales because the women who complains weren't going to play the game anyways when it gets "censored". They are a minority and aren't worth the effort to try to appeal to.

Ah, you're SJW trash.

False. Women buy more games than men. I can prove it.

except it doesn't

candy crush is free

So? What if I want to play a fighting game without being embarrassed by its treatment of women chars?

Tell me why sex shouldn't sell. Better yet, tell me why sexuality is bad.

You could start by dealing with the deeply rooted insecurities that make you care about the fake pixel woman's dresscode.

>and gets more people to buy it.
That's the crux, but I'd like to see the evidence of that.

The other counter argument hinges on >objectional content.
This is entirely relative and culturally influenced. If the things being censored aren't that bad, then doing so may reinforce a growing trend of puritanism wherein people become more repressed and ultimately unhappy. I'd say that's wrong.

On a meta-level, this is all quite peculiar. The business owners just want to appeal to whatever the majority wants as to maximize profits. But there's know way to "hear" the majority, only the loudest minority. Both puritans and lechers will say they speak for the whole and denounce the other's voice as unjustified. I think the best thing we can do is maintain an atmosphere of free discussion and let people vote with their wallets.

Though personally, if dey take out da titties, I ain't buying it.

>What if I want to play a fighting game without being embarrassed by its treatment of women chars
You're too fucked in the head to understand that sexy and attractive people aren't embarrassed to show off their bodies, and only envious weirdo freaks soil their pants at the sight of sexy people, be they real or fictitious.

Attached: 1529218432012.jpg (538x720, 140.86K)

Assuming you're not the creator you have an ethical duty to uphold their original intent in all things.
Because they made it and you didn't.

It doesn't matter how many copies sell, it doesn't matter what it earns. Shit, I've got two novels out, they've been read by maybe 20 people between them tops and got an average rating of 4 stars a piece (Romance novelist masterrace)
And if someone else took my work, changed it and earned me a million reads, I'd be pissed, because it wouldn't be the thing I made that succeeded and it would be that way against my will.

Oh sure you can offer to beat me with a stack of cash to change it, and who knows, maybe you'll succeed.
But that should be my choice, not yours.

its distracting me so i keep losing

Damn, I don't know why but flip flops do things to my dick

Then don't fucking play the game.

ok hwitie

It's absolutely retarded, since it only remove things that would have helped the game sell more.
100% of things that are removed are only because of retarded twitter people that wouldn't have bought the game in the first place. And crying about it only ensure that the game will become more known and attract the people that buy games.

Therefore, even if it sounded legitimate on paper, it's absolutely retarded in practice.

>B-but sex and waifus don't sell
Overwatch. Even leftists wank to it without playing the game
>B-but extreme violence
Every Call Of Duty after Modern Warfare (the first one)
>B-but that bikini is too lewd
It's the point. It sells. Select another costume if it shocks you.

If it was in the game from the beginning of the design phase, leave it. If it's gacha-DLC-postMarketingDecision-Lewd Swimsuits, leave it.
The only acceptable option for censorship is for it to be toggleable in the options, be it for gore or sex. It's by far the best solution, but people will still shit their pants about any opinion.

Attached: 1414512401214.jpg (634x563, 53.39K)

> I can prove it.
if you have to state that you can prove it instead of proving it, you just prove that you cant prove it.

>I write articles for a major gaming site
>writes "means more games, means more gooder."
Well shit, checks out.

Putting censorship in quotes just immediately shows you're being disingenuous.

Why not have a toggle for the content?

If you don't like a costume, have an option to censor it so you can't see it. So both parties can enjoy it.

Give me one good reason why that can't work.