13.3TF Custom RDNA 2 GPU @ 1.7GHZ with 60 Compute Units

Sony won.

Attached: ps5.png (866x317, 63.73K)

>@ 1.7GHZ
>Only 5.5 GB/S SSD
>16 GB RAM

Top kek
My phone is more powerful than this

There is 0% chance this is the case.
Especially now that it is confirmed that Xbox has 52CUs instead of 56.

I'll take AMDs official lines from the guy who developed both semi custom chips for both consoles over schreier

Attached: 1584458431128.jpg (1440x2688, 1.1M)

If these people are excited for specs on a console, they are going to be really impressed when they find out PCs exist.

No, xbox has 56 CU with 4 deactivated for yields.

SONY ROCKERS IN THE HOUSE TONIIIIIGHT

EVERYBODY JUST HAVE A GOOD GOOD GOOD TIME

Attached: 1526110337609.jpg (919x663, 63.78K)

cope

And the github leak claimed 56 active. Just like the github leak claimed Oberon only had 36CUs.

your shitdroid phone isn't more powerfult han an RTX 2080 Ti, rajeesh.

>Enhanced Dual Shock 5 with haptic triggers, heartbeat monitors and built in microphone
>built in microphone
That's going to be fucking annoying

And it comes with 0 exclusives.

So? They obviously tested with 56 active during regression tests. They did the same with the xbox one when deciding whether to unlock the 2 extra CU or bump the CPU clocks and went with the latter. Github has been absolutely spot on with literally everything so far. Doesn't mean the PS5 is 9.2tf but at one point in time it was.

Devkits have fully active chips. Devkit X1X have 44CU enabled to give debugging overhead. If anything 52CU further supports Github as they were testing a devkit, and it also explains ridiculous PS5 clock, that being a clock only seen in devkits

Attached: HERES GITHUB.png (500x310, 207.1K)

>Full digital backwards compatibility
Can there not be a better word for this? It's going to be the shitty PS Now service and you know it. That's an insult to actual backwards compatibility that functions better on basically every other console that isn't the Switch.

I wonder how sony will cope with not having DXR but instead having to use some custom API solution with opengl or vulkan

All that power wasted on movie rendering.

lmfao take all the compute you want, it will do you no good on that dated uarch

Attached: RDNA2 misunderstanding explained.png (628x407, 30.66K)

>Devkits have fully active chips.
So that means PS5 has 32CUs?
Makes no sense user. I think you should bide your time and not make stupid fucking assumptions based on incomplete out of context datamined "leaks" while you still can.
We know for a fact PS5 has RT. Github said that the suspected PS5 chips didn't have RT.

Sony doesn't support ogl or vulkan iirc. They have their own proprietary API called GNM so whatever they're doing is probably built in house. Microsoft has a colossal advantage due to the fact both AMD and NV GPU on desktop PCs all use DXR and MS patented VRS as standard.

>RDNA1 with RT
>Highly propable
Kek.

>Full digital backwards compatibility with every PlayStation console and handheld for a library of 1000's of games on day 1
If this means I can unify my PSN purchases from PSP/PS3/Vita/PS4, then great, I'll get one
If this is some bullshit PS Now shit then I'm done with consoles.
I really hope it at least works with all PS4 discs. I wouldn't expect any of the previous generations to work

>So that means PS5 has 32CUs?
Says who? 4 extra CUs might be the MS solution to devkit debugging overhead, doesn't mean it's the same for Sony
>We know for a fact PS5 has RT. Github said that the suspected PS5 chips didn't have RT.
No, GitHub only didn't test for them
big cope

No. It didn't say it doesn't have RT. It just wasn't tested. The github leaks are results from testing which have been almost reverse analysed based on the final results to get clockspeeds and hardware specs based on the performance. It doesn't explicitly say any specs anywhere.

XSX official specs confirm the github leak was bullshit, can't wait for the PS5 to BTFO XSX and all the xniggers

twitter.com/nomura115/status/1239546120495382528?s=19

Leaker who called everything on SX says PS5 is 13.3tflops of RDNA2.

But why wasn't it tested?
Why was none of the next-gen features tested? Why was it almost as if only current-gen performance was tested?

>Tommy Fisher
You're leaving out how he got everything else wrong including saying the PS5 would be revealed/detailed on March 3rd. He's a fraud and an idiot

GPU clocks almost never break 2ghz.

>16th of March
How is this leak?

>Full digital backwards compatibility with every PlayStation console

What the fuck this even mean? Can I even play my copy of Dragon Warrior VII on this console? That's all I care about if not then this console is just as worthless as my PS4 at least Microsoft did something right with Series X

That leaker who copied everything from github but faked PS5 specs and got banned from resetera

Because the leaked data was for two completely different types of tests?
PS5 was a back compat test, XSX was something entirely different

Xbox went first with the spec reveal because they know for sure they are more poewrful. There were even people talking to xbox insiders all the way back in Jan 2019 who said 12TF RDNA2 and that MS knew they were much more powerful, and have stuck to their word the entire time and been correct about it

Why are you asking me? Ask the AMD engineer who did the testing. His whole fucking resume was in the github files because he fucked up that bad. It was a legitimate leak from AMD. It's not fake. It was 100% accurate as of the time it was posted ~mid 2019. Doesn't mean it's still true now but it was true at a point in time. Maybe Sony didn't even have the RT cores enabled at the time of testing.

No. He only got it wrong when it was coming out. And with Sony delaying/cancelling literally everything else, it only stands to reason they would delay this as well in favor of an online presentation format.

AMD confirmed both are on RDNA2, I'm betting PS5 is slightly weaker though because the SX form factor will clearly have better cooling than anything Sony uses.

Sony likes a smaller box for their internals.

Means you can download any game that has been on a Playstation console from their server and play it on the 5. In theory.

Yes and their competition is on topic.

>GitHub got CU wrong, so it's not valid!
>But Tommy Fisher getting the date wrong doesn't mean he's invalid
ok then

It's best to accept no leaks have grounding right now.

The most legit but still questionable thing was AMD saying RDNA2 powers next gen consoles(plural)

>AMD Zen2 8 core @ 3.4 GHZ (Sony is working on boosting to 3.7GHZ)

STOP BELIEVING SONY BULLSHOTS. consolefags are STILL retarded, how can this be in 2020 after all these generations.

you don't boost to 3.7 for more than a few fucking seconds on Zen2 without fucking watercooling or a crazy/noctua fan, which the ps5 isn't going to have. ps5 isn't going to have a 3900x in it.

this is a console, they're going to need a locked clocked for as much stability as possible. MS is doing it right if they are indeed locking the clock down at something stable. they're fucking up with proprietary SSDs but that's par for the course and expected from both companies

False lol

SX might end up with better cooling, but the console if ugly af.

So what you are saying is that there is a good chance that the oberon leak isn't representative of the final PS5 specs?
>Xbox went first with the spec reveal because they know for sure they are more poewrful.
There is no way to know this so why are you bringing this up? Even MS literally doesn't know this to be the case. They can't know. So this is delusional. Why would Sony chose to reveal 2 days later then?
So basically you have just proven that there is a chance that this was merely a chip made to test BC for PS4Pro on RDNA and nothing more.
In other words neither of you two were able to give the real reason why those tests weren't run. Just a bunch of wishful speculation from people who is grasping at straws to have their Xbox be superior.
Will it have under 12TF? I think it could. Will it be less poweful? I wouldn't jump to any conclusions on that one yet.

microsoft has 8 cores locked to 3.8ghz confirmed or alternatively 8 cores 16 threads locked to 3.6ghz

this is confirmed official information

It looks like a Mini ITX PC?

>(Sony is working on boosting to 3.7GHZ)
Nigga there is no work to be done just ask AMD for better chips

The Github leak didn't get anything right about the final hardware. The dates of these reveals were almost certainly pushed back because of the corona virus. They couldn't do a reveal in the same style of the PS4 even if they wanted to. It is only reasonable.

I never said the xbox is more powerful you retard stop projecting your Sony fanboy garbage. I said the github leak was most certainly true. Kys.

Sony confirmed the PS5 was gonna be unveiled at GDC but they pushed it back(obviously because the corona virus)

>So what you are saying is that there is a good chance that the oberon leak isn't representative of the final PS5 specs?
Yeah, instead it'll be 36 CU RDNA1+RT @ 1.8GHz, with the 2GHz clock reserved for devkits for debugging overhead.

MS will be @ 3.6 with the 16 threads it only makes sense. devs still like brute forcing things if they can get away with that over optimization, more threads will be fine. the 2.5 GB dedicated to system seems like overbloat, but then again, it seems like both ms/sony don't care about streamlining their OS to free up more memory for games either. GOTTA MAKE SURE YOU CAN ACCESS THE STORY INSTANTLY WITH A TOUCH OF A BUTTON

k just adressed the idea that 3.7ghz is somehow not feasable, it seems to be

And what is going to happen if PS5 ends up having over 11TF of performance? Will you commit suicide like a person in your position seemingly should?

>op has litterally wasted all this time in cobbling up old rumors from the bogus multi-gen bc
>despite the fact that sony has already confirmed that the event has nothing to do with specs

>Xbox much more powerful than PS2
>360 much more powerful than PS3
>PS4 slightly more powerful than X1
>X1X much more powerful than PS4P
I think I'll take my chances. So what will you be doing if GitHub is real?

Then it's fucking worthless while the Xbox SeX can play OG Xbox discs at 4K like it or not no matter how much you like to shit on Microsoft

Base PS4 was 50% more powerful than base Xbone.

PS5 was more powerful than 360 but hard to develop for.

>you can download any game that has been on a Playstation console from their server

Translator's note: you can pay again for the games you already have

ps3 is weaker than 360 it's just some fanboy tale based on the idea that muh cell muh supercomputer meant it was faster in theory but it's truly just worse

It's not, but you can cope all you want.

>Base PS4 was 50% more powerful than base Xbone.
Not true, the difference is like 25% at most
>PS3 was more powerful than 360 but hard to develop for.
Wrong again, 360's got a better RAM setup + 10MB more as extremely fast framebuffer cache, a much, much better GPU, Xenon is over 2x as good as Cell, etc...

1.2tflops vs 1.8tflops of the same architecture.

6 moregflops which is half of Xbones flops, 50%

>but dood it's like ibm cell it's like custom super hard to develop for lmao it's totally a super computer
you always hear this meme being repeated but then actual facts get brought up and the discussions break up

>360 much more powerful than PS3
No. It was on par.

X1 is 1.4TF, and has a better CPU, 32MB L4, better APIs, DX12 feature level support in HW (PS4 only supports up to feature level 11.1)
It's not 50%

I'd be okay with digital BC if it meant piracy may someday open the gate for playing old psx/ps2/ps3 roms on it, but i'm sure it will be limited to whatever classic editions they put on PSN.

>Full digital backwards compatibility with every PlayStation console and handheld for a library of 1000's of games on day 1

Pipe fucking dream. The fact people are even taking this "leak" seriously after reading this is asinine. Also,

>Estimated Retail price is $499

Really? The Series X was already aiming at a $599 even selling at loss and now the PS5 will somehow be able to be more powerfull and cheaper? This whole thing is just Sony ponie fever dream.

They usually shut up when you point out Xenon is basically 3 Cells taped together without meme SPE garbage

They allowed for the binding of the right stick for PSP games on the Vita so they would here if it comes to that

>Full digital backwards compatibility with every PlayStation console and handheld for a library of 1000's of games on day 1

you were doing ok until this part