>buy a game and your PC is better than the minimum requirements >game runs like shit anyway >request a refund >we don't issue refunds t. battlestate games >they revoke your right to play the game anyway >but they don't refund your money
Where were you when Escape from Tarkov devs are scamming people?
Chargeback, it's not hard. Your credit card company will understand
Leo Parker
not OP, i never had to do a chargeback, but i don't think it works on debit cards, maybe i'm wrong i can think of like, 4 ways to pay online that don't involve the use of a credit card
Jaxon Rogers
You always use a CC to pay online as your purchases are insured up the ass and you can do chargebacks. Getting swindled by some greaseball dev is your perogative.
Grayson Garcia
Not OP also. How do you do chargeback? Just call the issuer of your card and ask them?
Zachary Anderson
Call your card company, and request a chargeback with the transaction number.
Jayden Price
Bump, that's shocking. Do those "terms and conditions" text walls actually have legal standing in the States? I know my rights as a consumer and companies can say "if you buy from us you have to X and Y" but it's not a legal contract. That's like making murder legal by signing a paper stating "I hereby let Marky Mark kill me", it's completely retarded
If there's a problem I just tell the government that someone's fucking with me and they fix it free of charge but that rarely happens since corporations are perfectly aware of all this too
Benjamin Baker
It's only illegal if it's clearly opposed to laws. If not, then it is perfectly legal. For instance, they can't deny you a refund since Europe has a law concerning refunds. There has been some debate around digital goods, so the law might have changed surrounding that, but it was just an example. A lot of ToS aren't contradictory to laws, so they are still binding. You really need someone with a legal background to help you with a ToS
Brayden Green
ToS are not legal contracts in the strictest sense, and they can and do get thrown out in court. A checked box is not a signature, for instance. That said, it relies entirely upon the judge not being a piece of shit, if he just brings up that the "contract" is anything but and is only there to legally abuse anyone dumb enough to believe in it, then it gets thrown out.
Evan Smith
Пpивeт Hикитa
Carter Campbell
most terms and eulas are scare tactics to convince people to not try a refund, they're all almost always contracts of adhesion. as for op if its his first chargeback most banks will do it nqa if he doesn't have a history of abusing it or friendly fraud type stuff. and op also wonders if you can do charge backs with debits yes you absolutely can, its covered under the efta.
Charles Gomez
Is this bait? The issue is not that they denied the refund, the issue is that they revoked the right play the game but didn't give the money back.
Jason Edwards
This is fucking hilarious.
Post this shit around and get a journalist to pick up the story. This is almost as bad as "You will surely get the Karkand"
If you're from the EU you could probably sue them. If you're American you're fucked since America is as anti-consumer as it gets.
Nathaniel Morgan
>Actually believing nikita
Connor Reed
Contracts have to have this thing called "consideration". You can't have a contract that one of the signors gets nothing out of. If there is no consideration, the contract is void. They can't arbitrarily add new things into the contract and threaten to revoke the services they already agreed to provide if you don't agree to them, because then there'd be no consideration for you. At least, that's how it is in America. I don't know how it is in Russia. t. took a single class on business law for my accounting degree
>start correct the sentence you victim Dunno if this is intentionally or unintentionally hilarious.
Adrian Russell
Depends on your bank but mine certainly does chargebacks. Might have to wait 30+ days for them to conduct an investigation though. Get a credit card in the future. They generally do a good job of keeping your money safe from everyone other than yourself.
Gabriel Brown
Poccия - кpyпнeйший в миpe мycop
Adam Cruz
EULA means nothing if you're in Europe. Companies are not above the law.
As we all know, Russians are known for their honesty. >just typed out "reason for cancellation" with no screenshots or anything >the customer service rep in the OP cites the rule saying they can revoke it if you disagree with them instead of stating that he chargebacked Really giving me a big thought, here
Joseph Jones
Either bait or serious middle school, high grade weapons tier autism
Leo Rogers
>not only thousands of rebbitors fell for this stupid garbage but also thousands of Yas Forumsermin hungry for yet another lazy fake drama You motherfuckers really are just redditors in disguise, aren't you
How come the support chat log does not mention a chargeback?
Grayson Evans
>guy says one thing >company says other thing >company is the one telling the truth even though it has less proof because I like the game shut the fuck up sheep
John Powell
>knee-jerks like a literal sheep and blurts out some incomprehensible bullshit >believes a karma farming reddit man over a company that literally doesn't lose anything by refunding one fucking copy of a game >y-you are a sheep!!!! Don't bother posting anything else, you absolute insect.
Jack Morris
How come the support chat log does not mention a chargeback?
Logan Perry
>a company that literally doesn't lose anything by refunding one fucking copy of a game
Battlestate games is known for not giving refunds and forcing charebacks.
Elijah Richardson
>faggot devs have a history of being fucking faggots like this >also have a history of lying through their teeth to save face when things are looking bad >this exact thing happens again Yet people actually think the Tarkov devs are good lmao. Imagine playing this game, yet alone liking it.
Nathan Powell
дoбpaи дeнь oдин двa тpи чeтыpe, дoм, cпacибa
Nicholas Allen
>>believes a karma farming reddit man over a company that literally doesn't lose anything by refunding one fucking copy of a game The thing about mentally ill Russians is that they're mentally ill. If he did do a chargeback, they could've easily proved it with a screenshot of them being charged for it. and also these This whole thinks just reeks of being shit they made up afterwards once the first screenshot went viral.
Chargebacks usually carry a fee on top of the refund amount, plus the PR. And since the developers felt the need to fabricate a counter story I guess it certainly costs them "something".
Nathaniel Thomas
>This whole thinks just reeks of being shit they made up afterwards once the first screenshot went viral. That's because it is. Nobody except contrarians actually think for a second that BSG is being genuine.
Bentley Thomas
t. thighbone
Michael Taylor
Thighbone I made a reddit account and am now downvoting every post you've ever made, your precious karma is mine now, you're finished.
Samuel Hall
Also the chargeback in that post is 28 Feb, OP's conversation with them complaining about them removing the game after refusing a refund is from 22 Feb. Do the idiots falling for the dev's bullshit not know how time works?
>nigger issues a chargeback, then tries to request an official refund in order to double dip >gets caught
Colton Campbell
>Chargeback: 28 Feb
>Request refund: 22 Feb >Asking why the fuck they removed his game after refusing the refund: 22 Feb
How stupid are you?
Oliver Wood
>company that literally doesn't lose anything by refunding one fucking copy of a game >by sheer slav mathemagics a company refunding 150 bucks doesn't lose anything Russian shills confirmed for being too drunk to apply math 101
Thomas Nelson
They literally don't do refunds
Jayden Williams
Slavs are either on suicide watch or fascism watch now that Putin is their ruler for life.
Brandon Gonzalez
Niggerkita really needs those G-wagons, blz understand and buy more EoD edition is not pay2win xaxaxa
Nolan James
>refund request opened 22 feb >supposed chargeback done on 28 feb >complaint about no longer having access on march 3rd I don't trust these ruskies any more than I can throw them, but the timeline isn't the issue here. The fact that the shills expect you to believe the bot is programmed just pick a random clause in the EULA because it doesn't know what "chargeback" means is.
I don't trust either posts, but I'm leaning more towards the customer, simply on the fact that BSG already sell the game illegaly in the EU
Adrian Myers
So if it's only a chargeback why the fuck doesn't support's reply say "nigger you did a chargeback what the fuck do you want now", why does it quote a FUCK YOU WE CAN DO WHATEVER clause from ToS instead?