Reminder
Less exclusives is a good thing
Reminder
Less exclusives is a good thing
why are nintendies so afraid of the pc?
and that's a good thing, here's why
>Patricia Hernandez
>Patricia Hernandez.
and nothing of value was spoken.
It is true, though.
Exclusives only exist to sell a particular brand of console, and surely none of us here are bugman enough to choose brand over vidya.
Just waiting on Nintendo
Fewer. And yes.
Reminder
Video games don't matter.
You're all faggots.
Exclusives are healthy for competition in the console market. However, permanent exclusives ultimately lead towards eventually piracy and emulation due to lack of availability. Eventual multiplat is the best response to a game getting "old" in industry market standards.
This is literally Yas Forums's core fucking mantra about exclusives, and anyone saying otherwise is either acting in bad faith (trolling), or are a tourist who genuinely bought the ironic console warring as gospel.
nintendo should be the only one still producing consoles. They at least have interesting ways of going about it once a blue moon while xbox and playstation are just low spec pcs.
But how will I justify buying 1 of every console if they don't have exclusives? I have an innate need to buy.
you don't, and consoles go extinction. You drive up pc sales and the master race will thank you
Who here is still not gonna bother with playing Horizon? Even if it's free?
>open world shit
No amount of modding can save this shit.
Magilla Gorilla finally says something that isn't completely retarded.
What's the even point of owning consoles then? Seriously how the fuck do they intend to sell them if not by limiting games to them? Those snoytards were right to chimp out about their shit getting ported, because it literally invalidates buying platform that serves no purpose except to limit games to it so you could force people to buy it.
price
Exclusivity bad. Open borders good. It's the socialist manifesto.
>only point of owning a console is being a hostage of some corporation
Sounds awesome.
no it's not
the consoles absolutely NEED exclusives as a selling point, otherwise nobody will buy it. The Last of Us, God of War, Spider-man, all 10+ million copies sold, where would PlayStation be without all these heavy hitters?
>and that's a good thing
>here's why
>and it's not ok
why journalists keep doing this shit?
Agreed.
>Exclusives are healthy for competition in the console market.
I respectfully disagree. When your competition is based upon locking content, you are competing to see who locks more interesting content rather than the content itself. The company ends more interested in securing an upcoming blockbuster rather than offering a better user experience.
There will always be people who prefer gaming on consoles than PC and vice-versa. If consoles are cheaper, don't require optimization, are powerful enough to offer a good gaming experience or offer unique gimmicks people will still buy them regardless of exclusives.
>locking content
Are you referring to pre-order bonuses or some shit? The fuck are you on about?
Easiest clickbait (and that's a good thing!).
I hope Nintendo catch on. I literally have their entire library as roms at this moment. I really don't know why they don't release the games of their older consoles digitally. They could even make their own online store and pocket the entire profits.
Exclusivity is locking content, games, on a chosen console. That's all exclusitivity is: locked content.
Unironically I don’t want games going to pc because the pc users of Yas Forums are entitled fucks that think they DESERVE a game because of their l33t rig.
It unironically IS a good thing.
>that's a good thing
I'm sick of this shit
Oh, I see, you're trolling. Carry on.
Okay, how do you define exclusivity then? Why do you think 'locked content' doesn't apply to the act of restricting a game behind a console?
Except open borders only benefit big money, while being on a scale from economically irrelevant to economically harmful for 99%. Modern "socialists" are embarrassing corporate and banking stooges.
I miss actual journalism where both sides of an issue are represented and you draw your own conclusion instead of glorified opinion pieces where you're told what to think right in the headline.
I agree. Been fighting against exclusives for years.
based grammar conscious user
>Snoyfaggots have spot games as significant exclusives on their tier list.
Are we even on the same board? Console warring is infinitely worse and there are too many of them who clog the catalog with their bullshit, rarely do you find PC threads compared to a console fanboy or shitpost thread
That never happened, journalism was always shitty.
I'm pretty sure the only remaining journalist in original meaning of this world still alive on Earth is Assange. When ZOG finally makes up something so they can execute him, word "journalist" can fully transition to derogatory term for propaganda mouthpiece for hire.
that's the one exclusive I don't even want on pc. ugly ass bitch voiced by ashly burch. yuck
>exclusive comes to a different platform after 10 years
wow
Mods will fix it.
It has no effect on the content itself unless it's a first party published title. Otherwise, publishers will secure exclusivity deals with independent studios that are looking to publish a product so that consumers will buy a specific brand. The quality of a product is entirely in the hands of the studio making the game and not the publisher unless they are funding development and/or a first party studio of the publisher.
So you don't have to pay as much as a beefy PC rig or Google stuff if you run into a technical issue? Do you consolefags have selective memory or something? Seriously.
Wow, three years later.
>Gorilla Hernandez
She still has a job?
>It has no effect on the content itself unless it's a first party published title.
When you say unless on the same phrase you already counterargued your own point. But I digress: even those who aren't first-party publishers get affected because they need to change their product alongside the gatekeeper directives. This is why games are censored in some consoles and in other aren't.
Besides, even if they don't change the content, it's still a lot of resources that are being used to secure exclusives rather than ensure a higher quality console or better user experience.
>anti-consumerism is on the rise,
>AND THAT'S A GOOD THING
OH fuck off
>Patricia Hernandez
Oh of fucking course
First party published titles are already exclusive because they are owned by the publisher since they are in complete control of the budget. Independent studios have their own budgets that affect development and publishing. Some studios can handle both. Most can't which is why they seek out publishers. That's the difference.
But we've been hearing from you PC fags for decades that I can build a PC for the price of a brand new PS4 and run all the same games on it. If that's true, like you fags say it is, then there truly is no point in buying a console because it's "cheaper"
You might want to play PC games with decent graphics at 60 FPS, that's the point of expensive rigs, not playing consoletrash at sub 30 FPS.
>Biggest exclusives
>and that's a good thing(tm)
the singular instance where this is actually correct
>competition in the console market.
This doesnt need to exist, eclusives only benefit corporations that sell plastix boxes and no one else.
>the consoles absolutely NEED exclusives as a selling point
this is your textbook example of meme induced brain damage; shitposting console war trash for so long you actually believe its real.
no, exclusives are good for competition
>sports games
Wipeout doesn't count, obviously
Anyone that could switch to pc has already done it. The only consolefags left are the super poorfag and the retards that can't operate a computer.
You didn't talk about my point of modifying content because of guidelines, be it political or because of technical limitations. This is caused by exclusivity and has a direct effect on content.
no, first party exclusives are good for competition because they are being developed / funded by the company itself. So the focus is on game quality such that people are convinced to buy one console over another.
>and that's a good thing.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT why do """"they"""" always do this shit? Every fucking thing, every article- needs to end with what our opinion should be.
>I can build a PC for the price of a brand new PS4
>and run all the same games on it
It's almost like PC's are super flexible and have multiple budget options, mind blowing. I'll make this simple for you to understand: PS4 are for retards and poorfags got it? Good.
Platinumgames wants Bayo on PC put Nintendo wont let them
Honestly I'd rather companies stop making home consoles which are irellevant now they are weaker than most PCs. atleast Nintendo went for handheld hybrid, literally the only modern handheld leftg on the market which is retarded.
Isn't the article fake?
who made this list?