Does Yas Forums prefer to game in 4:3 or 16:9?

I like it more for text heavy use-cases like word processing and coding, but 16:9 is better for gaming.

4:3: soul
16:9: soulless

4:3 is more comfy

Attached: 1:1.png (400x410, 67.88K)

You see...

You can ether have 16:9 or letter-boxed 4:3 for the same experience.

t. Person that lived in both eras

Anything other than 16:10 is objectively wrong.

have you tried putting your screen sideways and playing as it was a 9:16 screen?

6:9 or fuck off nerd

Attached: 6deda5c6.jpg (1080x665, 88.66K)

I wonder why 99% of the world's greatest art is in square format, yet 99% of trash movie garbage is rectangle

relly makes you think

>99% of the world's greatest art is in square format
You what

stay fucking jelly

Attached: 1610.webm (1920x1200, 318.24K)

16:9

4:3 is still a rectangle retard

Attached: 1583287061437.jpg (520x416, 35.54K)

Obviously I prefer widescreen when available but if the game was made in 4:3 then by god that's the aspect ratio you play it in, boy. If you stretch that shit you should be slapped.

>letting the top and bottom get cut off

Attached: 1560281125441.jpg (357x293, 37.07K)

Almost every game in existence crops 16:10 instead of adding to it though. Shit sucks. I had a 16:10 monitor for years, until I realized most games were getting cropped / stretched / letterboxed.

>all those claims and none is right
>reddit spacing

In which case you play in 16:9.

based

I like 4:3 for websites and 16:9 for everything else, I'm alone on this?

4:3

Attached: image.png (1440x1080, 1.52M)

I like websites that don't switch to mobile garbage when hit with anything thinner than 16:9.

Then most games get cropped / stretched / letterboxed. 16:9 really is the better investment.

this is the most retarded post I've seen all week

Attached: 1558800669291.jpg (640x585, 73.09K)

Attached: image.png (1600x1200, 55.47K)

Can you not read? If 16:10 gets stretched due to shit fov settings you just play in 16:9. You can do both on 16:10 displays, they're just better.

Attached: image.png (1920x1080, 584.78K)

Yas Forums truly is the most low IQ media board
astonishing...

Why yes, I do play vidya in 21:9 - the most kino aspect ratio, how did you know?

Attached: 1583847432151.png (693x601, 242.94K)

I stick to 16:9 since it's my monitor resolution, but 4:3 is cool too and I'm fine with playing at it for older games designed when it was the norm. Not a huge fan of ultrawide though.

Should I be emulating in 8:7 or 4:3?

8:7 on a LCD, 4:3 if you have a CRT or CRT filter.

come back when you have high refresh

Depends on the game.

Depends on the type of game.

Go back to r*ddit

My man

Damn, he fucking based

4:3 is the superior format and the most natural. Unfortunately theaters with limited ceiling height memed moviegoers into horizontalscreens and now games don't support 4:3 anymore.

So this is the intelligence of euro-Yas Forums...

>16:10

Attached: 1579935496935.jpg (600x800, 146.64K)

Attached: 1385743616195.png (203x209, 14.16K)

16:9

Attached: Screenshot (37).png (1920x1080, 2.5M)

patrician taste

t. ex16:10, current 16:9 owner

Would have been nice if the widescreen standard was 15:10 (3:2) or 20:10 (2:1). I like neat numbers and neat ratios.

16:10 > 16:9 > 4:3
If the game is locked to a particular aspect ratio, use it rather than letterboxing.

uh, retard... 16:9 is objectively the closest one to correctly cover your horizontal/vertical field of views (when factoring in extra 100 degrees of non-foveal viewing angle in horizontal axis), the rest depends on the size of the display and your distance from it.

>first person
16:9

>top-down
4:3

I;'m really liking 21:9 especially for fps

Attached: bfv_2020_03_08_04_15_22_812.jpg (2560x1080, 3.04M)

include me in /r/Yas Forums screencap

fucking love the atmosphere in those games. 2 less so, but hexen 1 and heretic were rad as fuck

21:9 or fuck off

Attached: 20191217145716_1.jpg (3440x1440, 591.1K)

>to game