Full Doom Eternal PC Specs

Full Doom Eternal PC Specs
Minimum

Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
OS: 64-bit Windows 7/64-Bit Windows 10
Processor:Intel Core i5 @ 3.3 GHz or better, or AMD Ryzen 3 @ 3.1 GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (4GB), GTX 1060 (6GB), GTX 1650 (4GB) or AMD Radeon R9 290 (4GB)/RX 470 (4GB)
Storage: 50 GB available space
Additional Notes: (1080p / 60 FPS / Low Quality Settings)
Recommended

Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
OS: 64-bit Windows 10
Processor: Intel Core i7-6700K or better, or AMD Ryzen 7 1800X or better
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8GB), RTX 2060 (8GB) or AMD Radeon RX Vega56 (8GB)
Storage: 50 GB available space
Additional Notes: (1440p / 60 FPS / High Quality Settings)

970 still going strong boys.

Attached: 2809941.jpg (738x600, 89.06K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gamespot.com/articles/doom-eternal-pc-system-requirements-recommended-sp/1100-6474507/
steamcommunity.com/app/782330/discussions/0/1749024748628213641/
youtube.com/watch?v=mnxwPQ-fpGA
youtube.com/watch?v=9w0XiVjcRfU
m.youtube.com/watch?v=pboDbxogSw4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>playing nu-doom

can i make a wad of doom eternal and sell it? or will zenimax sue me ?

Considering the 970 launched back in 2014 and it is now 2020 I would say it is holding up quite well.

You wouldn't be able to play most 2006 titles with a GPU launched in the 2000.

it would be silly to not have a 64-bit processor these days

where did you get this from?

can I run this game?

Attached: michael scott.png (653x446, 46.06K)

I'm curious to see how well this scales as doom 2016 runs like butter on my setup at 4k - pushing 100fps on nightmare settings at all times I have observed during playthroughs.

I'd be more impressed with the 290 - that was a 780 competitor in late 2013 and still puts in a strong showing today. The rare 8gb versions (or effectively the 390 - though there is a memory clock difference) does even better due to raw capacity. Doom 2016 cannot run nightmare textures on 4gb cards at 1080p.

gamespot.com/articles/doom-eternal-pc-system-requirements-recommended-sp/1100-6474507/

oh neat

it appeared on steam store page
when people saw recommended they started refunding the game, cause can't run it
several hours later they hid system requirements

LOL

>Ryzen 5 3600
>16gb 3200mhz ram
>Powercooler RX5700 (flashed with XT bios)

1440p high here we come

This but a 3600X and a RX 580 8GB so High 1080p here I cum

People are mad that their 670 can't run games on Full HD 60fps High anymore?

>when people saw recommended they started refunding the game, cause can't run it
Which is so stupid as those numbers are for 1440p high - there is a world of difference between pushing that and 1080p 60ish fps. Once again I bet it is the laptop users bitching that their 5 year old alienware machine can't run the latest and greatest. Laptop users are fucking cancer on software development (see also: emulators).

>580
Update that shit senpai

steamcommunity.com/app/782330/discussions/0/1749024748628213641/

Read and weep.

my 1030gt will do fine
lol

this guy actually thinks that no GPU that is out currently will be able to run the game
how can people be so fucking tech illiterate in 2020?

>60hz in 2020

Easily, even at 1440p at high settings

>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
>(4GB)

Attached: 1563986106003.jpg (620x465, 60.96K)

970 is capable of running '16 on 1440p Ultra 60fps
if thats been relegated to 1080p Low 60fps then we're looking at RDR2 tier port here

REMINDER THIS IS JUST PAID HARDWARE SHILL FROM BETHESDA, BECAUSE THEY WILL RELEASE THE GAME ON SWITCH, A LITERAL CASIO CALCULATOR
Using resolution scaling you can probably get solid 60fps in bottom line cards like 1030 or 1050, 720p
inb4 720p lol
at least IMO, this game is about gameplay, and visuals are second

>970 is capable of running '16 on 1440p Ultra 60fps
i absolutely dare you to show me that because i dont believe you

>AMD
No. You're probably too dumb to figure out the install.

Why? It's perfectly fine

>how can people be so fucking tech illiterate in 2020?
You are aware which board you are on correct?

Attached: once again v shows its technical understanding of hardware.jpg (1024x1275, 552.74K)

REMINDER PUBLISHERS SHOVE ULTRA SETTINGS INTO GAMES JUST TO SELL CARDS, SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE ILEGAL
YEARS LATERS, SOME GAMES CAN'T EVEN ULTRA PROPERLY ON HIGHEND NEXT GEN CARDS, LIKE ARKHAM KNIGHT
IT IS A LITERAL SCAM

>i7-6700K/1080 for 1440p 60fps
no that bad

>implying my 1050 ti won't be able to run this

Attached: loads_shotgun_with_malicious_intent.png (1000x779, 582K)

intel KIKE detected

Attached: 1452824338782.png (635x482, 790.12K)

youtube.com/watch?v=mnxwPQ-fpGA

enjoy

Attached: 2560.png (1299x3103, 148.61K)

>needing to type out which update you have installed.

Why do people buy AMD gpus again?

Attached: 1565202395906.gif (320x240, 1.76M)

nvidia shilloid detetced

But can it run doom?

So RT 5700 or 5600 will have no problem running this with a decent CPU?

Show benchmarks pleb.

retard

HERE WE FUCKING GO
>SPECCY THREAD

Attached: file.png (2004x1614, 228.11K)

I'm not the original guy you're responding to. I'm just sick of the "amd driver' meme. Amd cards dominate the mid-range market and have minimal driver issues. The no driver meme hasn't been relevant really since 2012ish.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN MY 670 CAN'T RUN THIS!?!?!?!?

it just werks

Attached: Screenshot (74).png (826x607, 51.7K)

>R9 285 2GB
>i5 4460 @ 3.2 GHz

Attached: 1572452690672.jpg (400x900, 217.31K)

I'm so sorry

Navi had atrocious driver issues. They've been fixed since.

easily
youtube.com/watch?v=9w0XiVjcRfU

Are you an actual shill?
m.youtube.com/watch?v=pboDbxogSw4

thank you
to be fair, I use it to play indies and old AAA
to play the current stuff, I use geforce now, but now that the publishers are lobbying to finish it, I am basically out of the current AAA game for a while
no big deal, 2bh

Might as well ask here
1660 Super good for regular 1080p60 gaming? anything else i should consider?

rThat's the only major incident in recent history. And only retards buy brand new high end shit right away. Fuck off

i would honestly spend the extra money and just grab an RTX 2060
raytracing is a heavy meme at this point but the card is a beast at only $300 USD

I know it can cause i have same one.
>tfw retards sperg out over specs that have been deleted within two hours

Speccy is cancer so have this instead.

Attached: system specs.png (1572x1671, 1.02M)

>3ghz cpu
the Chad 2500k overclock vs the virgin octacorelette

>cancer
why? it just works

just fucking use HWINFO

Attached: file.png (641x575, 81.18K)

>tfw bought an RTX 2060 S to go together with 32 gb RAM and a Ryzen 2600
Still wouldnt want to play this game

Why are you using a decade old HDD?

>update

He's not typing out which update he installed, he typed out that he flashed the 5700XT BIOS onto his 5700(non-XT) therefore increasing the performance slightly. What he said had literally nothing to do with drivers or updates.

ok, let's do this
thank you

had it lying around said "fuck it, games are getting bigger so i might need the extra space"
i only have like 2 games installed it on it that are not even that big though so whatever

I'm not the one that bought an AMD gpu then posted my about which bios I needed I needed to run to make it work like it was a haxor skill.

Attached: 1571770048137.gif (521x514, 371.46K)

I've been gaming on CPU only for about a year.

I can play anything from pre 2019 on high surprisingly well, unless it has yhuge texture maps in which case I have to bump that down to medium.

Attached: Speccy.png (726x408, 29.83K)

To be fair, it doesn't help that some dev said it's more optimized than the 2016 version, and then they go ahead and release those requirements.

Nigga Asus Gpus ram module were frying because of driver issues.

Attached: 1583143012111.gif (300x252, 2.87M)

Yes, the same kind of people who say: my can still run all games maxed out at 60 FPS! But never provide benchmarks.

Then whenever their 7970 or GTX 770 won't run a new AAA game they call it horribly optimised.

fairly low-end system by now. waiting for the 3080ti and whatever best cpu is at the time. 4 cores in 2020 just isn't right

Attached: 2.png (672x603, 109.74K)

It doesn't - it still doesn't report a lot of things correctly.

I could but then I wouldn't be able to so easily shitpost showing off my glorious 120hz 4k screen.

cool shit

Attached: file.png (1920x1776, 477.01K)

>t.

Attached: 1579658696749.png (740x491, 565.26K)

>that guy even owns a 2080ti
Jesus christ.

I also have a 2080ti and a 144hz 4k monitor and its a bit of shame that it requires a beefier pc then 2016 since that ran 144fps almost locked at 4k. But ill manage ;)

I think my HDDs are from 2007. I should probably replace them at some point but I don't really access them since they're just animu storage and I rarely re-watch things.

More optimised doesn't necessarily mean easier to run.

Yes, but tell that to the people who don't know shit.

More optimised doesn't exclude higher requirements - it just means for the same performance envelope they have put more stuff in. Nightmare settings really might just be that much more demanding even if it is more optimised than 2016. Optimisation and high requirements are not mutually exclusive contrary to what Yas Forums believes.

My new rig is on the way.
>Motherboard: B450m Mortar Max
>Ram: Vengeance LPX 16gb 3200mhz CL16
>CPU: Ryzen 5 3600
>GPU: Zotac 2070 Super Mini
Hoping I'll be able to hit constant 144hz @ 1080p with a mix of high/ultra settings.

ITT: INSIDER CHAD

Attached: file.png (1659x384, 159.12K)

>Ryzen 5 3600
nice bottleneck retard

absolute retard

Specs aside.
Reminder that in the final two levels you'll be fighting hell.
And after that playing two dlc's one of which is about wrecking hell one more time

Attached: Adnotacja 2020-03-06 172017.jpg (796x1065, 191.5K)

You mean a cpu barely behind a stock 9900k for less than half the cost?

that shouldnt bottleneck too bad in most games, the R53600 is a pretty great gaming CPU and can handle most mid to high end GPUs

>only retards buy AMD cards
Ftfy

Attached: 1566375970407.jpg (514x405, 83.87K)

Recommended specs are horseshit and minimum spec is always just whatever the weakest pc with a discreet gpu the devs have handy on-site.

Those specs will run this on medium/high at a perfect 60fps at a minimum, only reason for the drop will be that the levels are massively larger than 2016.

>PC shooter at under 144 fps

Attached: 1548524128450.png (136x102, 16.55K)

Attached: 1550332869302.png (1064x698, 321.29K)

Cope amd pleb. You should have bought a 2070. Ya goofed.

Attached: 1561642703516.jpg (540x661, 41.11K)

my shitbox Frankenstein may be able to handle it but jesus christ i need a new everything except gpu

Post the icon of sin

The 3600 is literally the nu-2500k.

>ayymdtards think their cards are reliable and worth the same price as overpriced Nvidia cards
Just stick to cpu's.

Attached: yold2tk7z4l41.jpg (960x540, 65.62K)

>should have paid 40% more for the same performance
this is your brain on nvidia