Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: 1583166966421.png (1050x551, 368.53K)

they didn't even try with her lines

Edelgard is never wrong, Yas Forums is just contrarian.

Just finished her route today and I have to say she did literally nothing wrong.

Attached: 1580444686063.jpg (870x1024, 120.96K)

Except her argument makes COMPLETE sense.

He makes a moralfag argument about how she should stop what she's doing because it's causing deaths

She turns it right back around on him and says the same result (no more war) could be had if they simply surrendered

His argument isn't a moral one, it's a political argument (I deserve this land!!) masquerading poorly as a moral argument

>lies to you
>lies to her closest allies
>lets bad uncle tell her lies and influence her into hating Rhea despite being responsible for pretty much all of FETH and death of all her siblings and Dimitri's rage and her knowing it

>never wrong

Edelgard. She's a femcel who's thirsty for Big Boar Cock but hates herself too much to actually talk to him. Everything would've been resolved if they'd just TALKED.

>Make multiple plotlines
>Instead of making a plot where this makes sense, just make the characters act completly retarded in the plotline they are villains
Great game

Fire Emblem series wise obviously Dimitri was in wrong, because dragons and church are always evil in series and he's the only lord who willingly decided to side with them

3 houses is more ambiguous in regard to them.