Do you think Wastelanders has the potential to turn this game around...

HOLY FUG

THEY FIXED EVERYTHING

looks like its going to be an mmo where the next big patch changes everything and old quests are removed and the new ones placed over them. RIP over seer. Even still she has a hard life getting deleted after all of that struggle and pain ;_;.

lol who plays this shit?

I just hope they don't put settlement building. There are better game to play with better means of building and city management then fucking fallout

the base building is the biggest example, its not the greatest but it wasn't completely hated so i can see it getting kept in the next elder scrolls
honestly if 76 somehow did well i would have absolutely expected some online element in es6

Absolutely not. Fallout is very, very dead.

Holy fucking shit I hope not. These motherfuckers ain't the ones to trust with making a GOOD multiplayer RPG.

Did you even read the article? All the old quests remain. Also, if you would have seen ANY SINGLE LEAK about Wastelanders you would know the overseer lives and you have a conversation with her.

They're not wasting dev time because they gave 76 to another studio after Launch. Everything after launch has nothing to do with Todd and the A-team.

Just because you add sprinkles to a piece of shit, doesn't change the fact still a piece of shit, FO76 is a piece of shit, Zenimax is a pile of shit. and fuck bethesda.

Attached: 1562670811374.gif (390x357, 2.95M)

The 4 was a coffin and 76 the nail.

The only things they can turn around is me, when I leave in disgust after you put this shit in front of me.

>proper fucking fallout
What's a "proper" fallout? None of the games really have that much in common with each other. They work better as looter shooters than as overly serious rpgs desu

no

>They work better as looter shooters than as overly serious rpgs desu

Attached: 1400768636832.gif (493x342, 479.53K)

RPG's do not fucking work online. The closest one has come is ESO, and that is basically a single player game with minimally reactive world.

>tfw wanna try it
>big fallout fan
>but that $100 subscription

jesus christ, todd, at least drop it to $50 you fucking jew

Attached: 98F27817-EE6F-4FEC-B953-03071424FE7B.png (500x584, 295.55K)

I haven't played for a year or so, not much to do after you get to level 400, you can solo the end boss of the game and really the only thing that's left is collecting beer recipes and collecting atoms so you can buy camp items to re-build your settlement from scratch with new ideas ad nauseum. Granted it was fun for a while.

But yeah I'm gonna be checking out wastelanders. If for nothing else then at least the new lore.

Attached: Photo_2019-07-05-093459.png (1920x1080, 2.95M)

>subscription
lmao what just don't buy it

>subscription
You only need to pay for the game once. The subscription just gives you a few advantages. It is not required to continuously play the game.

If you're playing fallout games for strong writing or a coherent 'universe' you're the only dummy between us.
Go back and play the first game and it's very, very light on narrative until the end (maybe a bit earlier if you talk to harold), the mood is the thing.
It should really have ended with the first one but welp people took it too seriously so here we are.

shame this location isn't unique at all nowdays

also, does the game have a fast travel rug yet?

Attached: Photo_2019-06-18-002128.png (1920x1080, 1.84M)

>new lore
Lore in Behtesda Fallout is barely relevant as they pick and choose and change shit constantly to their own liking.

Attached: Photo_2019-05-10-071321.png (1920x1080, 3.21M)

They will never make a proper fallout. They have changed the formula from RPG to looter shooter and are trying to erase the history about series's RPG past through retcons.
The fact they are adding human NPCs shows that they don't know what to do with this game themselves. They intended that players themselves will create the gameworld around them, now they are changing the very basis of the game.

fuck off shill kill yourself

do you know what also was a retcon? the vault experiment

people wanted human NPCs so they added them, should they just ignore what the players want?

Attached: Photo_2019-06-30-043458.png (1920x1080, 2.19M)

I can't wait to see how beth fucks this up.

>shithesda
LMAO
O
L

Attached: toobaducantbuildthere.png (1920x1080, 2.94M)

Why are you telling me this? Did I say that vault experiment is canon?

nah but you're saying it like retcons are a bad thing

>Bethesda
Name a more incompetent game development studio.

They are.

okay.....?

No, no, and sent shill :^)

I don't get why you're defending bethesda. 76 is a bad game and they prioritized micro transactions, a "premium subscription" and a pointless battle royal mode before getting to one of the most complained aspects of the game.

>Well met Hegathe Walker, there's another settlement taht needs your help. I'll mark it on your map.

I would have bought this piece of shit if it wasn't for the always online requirement.

I played on launch, beat the story within a week and did the endgame "grind" and exploration for another before stopping from boredom. Adding NPCs isn't going to fix it. I also will hate them forever for making vaults """"raids""".

What the game need is content for high level players and PvE multi-player content. Wastelander probably will revitalise the game and attract some new players, but the lack of content of high level players will forever remain.

I dont care about bethesda I just want new fallout lore

>finally bring out NPCs, a new story, and private servers
>hahaha gotta pay $15/month for it
no

So does wastelanders retcon the original fallout 76 story out of existence? How does this work?

So will this have the same amount of quests as fallout 4 or is it just like 10-20 quests?

>Do you think Wastelanders has the potential to turn this game around? Do you think it has the potential to regain the good will of the fanbase?
The E3 2019 trailer already confirmed that the dialogue system still has the "YES/YES/YES("FUNNY")/NO" writing so absolutely not
i also expect the game to have a hundred new gamebreaking bugs at launch of this shit

>hundred
I like your optimism

The only thing this game had going for it was the giant map which was pretty well done. Had lots of potential that they just ignored.

Go home Todd!!

Attached: 1581302830495.jpg (639x755, 55.75K)

>they prioritized micro transactions
If they did, we would have seen far more atom shop content and far less updates for the game

>premium subscription
What it offers is hardly P2W, also it is the players who asked for utility items from the atom shop, people are willing to spend the money, not a lot of people are willing to spend it, but even if only a thousand people are willing to pay for it, it is still worth it for bethesda. Why do you hate capitalism?

>pointless battle royal mode
It is PvP that is better than survival mode PvP, people enjoyed it. You don't get to say what is pointless and what isn't.

>Y U DEFEND BETHESDA.

Go on, tell me that outer worlds is better than fallout 4 and bethesda should take note.

It's not out so no one knows.

>Bethesda caves to pressure
Why is this bad? Probably should reward good behavior.
>LOL i just want to hate on Betheda
This is not the way

The fuck the outer worlds have to do with anything?