Was it an even bigger disappointment than Dark Souls 2?

Was it an even bigger disappointment than Dark Souls 2?

Attached: eb53ad3dea5946b4d8fea1313e24ca602daf17b8.jpg (616x353, 36.28K)

>anti ds3 autist still seething cause it won't run on his toaster

yeah, ask your parents about disappointments

>one is dead
>the other has 10k+ daily players 4 years later
I don't know user, you tell me.

Attached: SEEAAAATTTHHHH.jpg (1920x1080, 585.08K)

The only thing that disappointed me in 3 is how they made parrying harder.

no

Yeah, DS2 was at least fun, by my 3rd playthrough of this game I realized none of the shit this game had were fun

This game was put together in 1 year with bloodborne assets and scrapped concepts

why is backstabbing so fucking loud in these games

ds2 is unironically the very definition of a rushed mess. Could of been greatest game of all time if those retards didnt rush and cut out a good chunk of the original game. True potential was shown with the dlc and sadly that isnt an awful ton of content.

Are you talking about DS3 or DS2, because your descriptions sounds more like DS3

Literally look up development for Ds2, they cut out like 50% than ds3 ever did.

I haven't played Dark Souls 3 but I really doubt that game can be worse than Dark Souls 2.
Most players knew that something went wrong with DS2 by the time they entered the tutorial area; in the previous game the training was in the atmospheric Undead Asylum but now the players had to learn the basic controls of the game in fucking poorly made hollow trees.
Absolutely unreal.

Attached: 13839120923563.jpg (352x264, 19.8K)

>they cut out like 50% than ds3 ever did.
I hope you never see the DS3 development and what they actually cut in DS3, ignorance is bliss

Soul:
1 > DeS > BB > 2 > 3

Quality:
3 > 1 > BB > DeS > 2

DS3 is great.

the real question: Prepare to Die edition or Remaster?

>Soul:
>DeS > 2 > BB > 1 > 3
>Quality:
>BB > 3 > DeS > 2 > 1
ftfy

no way lmao.

Attached: yawn souls 2.webm (800x450, 2.94M)

Both wrong.
Soul: DeS > BB > DS1 > DS2 > DS3
Quality: DS1 > BB > DeS > powergap > DS2 > DS3

3 grabs you by the balls immediately. A short and atmospheric tutorial area followed by a cool boss.

not at all.
2 was alright in concept and could have been pretty good but it was horribly made and just shat out
they were pretty creatively bankrupt by the time they made 3 though so it was pretty shit in that regard but the gameplay was at least pretty solid and it was fun to play. It was more like bloodborne: dark souls edition
they were both pretty disappointing in their own ways i guess but i thought 3 was a lot better than 2

Not at all. In fact, it redeemed the Dark Souls name after the shitshow of 2.

Sounds very good.
I'm playing Bloodborne right mow and I was disappointed by the absence of a real tutorial area.

PtD runs just fine and controls just fine with a controller. Remaster if you want to play online.

Why does everyone hate on Ds2? I actually thought it was fun. Ds3 fucking sucks

Attached: 3f6.png (349x251, 117.75K)

Close.
Soul: DeS > BB > DS1 > DS2 > DS3
Quality: DS1 > BB > DeS > powergap > DS3 > DS2

Don't give up on BB. I played it after 3 and dropped it for a while, it turns out pretty good, great DLC. I think 3 has better bosses/gameplay though

The level design alone makes it kinda of shit

The level design was a big part of why I liked the first game and 3's just didn't do it for me

Locking on in the old games was always pointless to me. The bosses are so slow that i pretty much did what this guy did with Fume and i never had a problem

It's literally cause some irish guy made a video saying it was bad.

I mean it's just my subjective opinion but yeah, early on in 3 I was like "yes, this is dark souls".
Some games have a bad start but they "click" after a few hours. 2 never clicked. I don't hate it but I never loved it.

nah mate

I tried to play it like 4-5 times in the past (stopped before even beating the first two bosses) but this time I will beat it for sure,
A few days ago I've beat the Bloodstarved Beast and now I'm against Amelia.

2 was far more disappointing because it never lived up to the hype it had before launch.

2 is more disappointing because the difference between that and Ds1 is massive.
3 is worse than 2 but only by a bit, the bar was already set pretty low.

I can almost guarantee you'll want to play it again, just like DS there's so much shit to miss. Honestly my only issue with it was chalice dungeons and of course PS4 (although it ran fine on pro)

>3 is worse than 2

Attached: 1575847770827.jpg (1024x1024, 54.14K)

Not even close. Partially because expectations were lower and partially because it's a better game.

is worse than 2

Because DaS2 looks and plays like a Chinese souls knockoff.

No, not initially. But in retrospective, yes.

I swear this place is delusional, 3 is a masterpiece, 1 fell off after anor londo and 2 feels like dark souls made in china

>1 below either
>3 is a masterpiece
Holy shit taste, user. It doesn't get much lower than that.

I am right tho

No, it was far better. DaS 2 fans have something fundamentally wrong with them.

Agreed but 1 is also a masterpiece.

it has the most boring bosses in the series. literally assets from bloodborne bosses and large sweeping arcs for the entire boss roster.

All the unique weapons from them are greatswords too.

3 is most certainly a good game and far better than 2, but ls definitely not a masterpiece. The second half of 1 is grossly exagerrated.

No one agrees.

What?
It has the best bosses in the series. DaS2 bosses are all shit and are all pushovers.

No, and no amount of shitposting will make that true.

Currently replaying the trilogy back 2 back, at Das2 now. It's far more tedious, otherwise gameplay/balance is solid.

Das1 runs out of steam shortly after Anor Londo, late game bosses bring nothing to the table (not to mention 3 times Asylum Demon reskin...)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BUT THE FUME KNIGHTERINOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

THE FUMERINO

Attached: 15696108190s.jpg (125x123, 3.25K)

>Dark Souls III
>Sekiro
>Bloodborne

Top 3 games from From Software.

Not amount of memes can change the fact that Dark Souls 2 is a piece of shit. """People""" like hbomberguy like Dark Souls 2 that should tell you everything you need to know about this game.

Attached: 851a17c057d11aa1b1c5c63560b707d9.jpg (640x615, 39.03K)

120hours on ds2 and no even ending the whole dlcs and content

50hours tops in ds3 and done everything and every boss

It took Bloodborne, and dumbed it down. Then it took Dark Souls, and half assed it. We're left with a game that is not as fun as Bloodborne, and isn't as deep or interesting as Dark Souls 1. It had good presentation, but it's soulless.

Dark Souls 2 is quite simply just Dark Souls 1, but with a quantity over quality design. It has horrible presentation, but has it's own charm that grows on you.

If you're only getting into the series now, then just play the newer games. You prpbably won't enjoy the older games if you're new to the series.

nobody asked

You haven't done everything, stfu. You haven't done every character's questline to the end, you haven't found every weapon/ring/armour, you haven't seen every ending.