WRONG. Get ready for a lesson in how God's word has been destroyed and bastardized Christards.
Yahowsha(Jesus) spoke Aramaic. However, because there are no Aramaic manuscripts dated prior to the 6th century CE, the available Aramaic texts cannot be considered reliable. And there are no Hebrew manuscripts of the eyewitness accounts. You can thank the Roman Catholic Church's determined destruction of all things Hebrew for that, if not completely as least in large part. Regarding the eyewitness accounts (mistakenly called Gospels by Christians), please be reminded that there are only two. They were authored by Mattanyah and Yahowchanan, or Matthew and John to those unfamiliar with the reality of who was named what. The historical records of Marcus and Lucas were based on their recollections of the memories of others; they were not eyewitness records.
Mattanyah's Greek translation of Yahowsha's statement in Aramaic containing a Hebrew quotation is the most challenging verse within the eyewitness accounts and other first century historical writings. As rendered, it throws everything into question. Translated three times, from Hebrew to Aramaic, then from Aramiac to Greek, and finally from Greek to English, it reads: "But nevertheless (de), concerning the immediate vicinity of (peri – regarding and referring to) that one specific and definite (ekeinos – unique, certain, emphatic, sequential, and distant) day (hemera – interval between sunrise and sunset) and (kai) hour (hora – a certain definite time) no one (oudeis - nobody) recognizes it (oida – appreciates, acknowledges, or is aware of, sees, perceives, discerns, notices, or knows it relationally), not even (oude) the messengers (aggelos) of heaven (ouranos), only the Father (pater) alone (monos)." (Yah Has Given Us A Gift / Mattanyah / Matthew 24:36)
According to the most reliable scholars, this passage was not included in any of the eighteen pre-Constantine manuscripts of Mattanyah. It is said there is a record, however, which mentions that those responsible for creating The Textus Receptus changed Mattanyah's alleged "not even the Son" remark so that it would match Marcus 13:32.
Therefore, when it comes to this passage, most scholastic tools are rendered unreliable. And unfortunately, there is only one manuscript of the Marcus account dating to the first-through-third century CE, and it ends in chapter 12. The final verses of chapter 12 and all the rest of the Marcus account do not appear in the single manuscript available to us from that time. This reliability problem is further compounded by the fact that, at best, English is a translation of a translation of what was said. And since most of the Olivet Discourse is quoted from ZakarYah, what we end up with is a translation three times over.
This leaves us with five different ways to explain the words currently found in Mattanyah and Marcus. First, if we retain the "not even the Son" reference, Yahowsha is neither divine nor Yahowah, and all of Scripture is a hoax, because it would be impossible for "the Word made flesh" to be unaware of the Word or for the human manifestation of Yahowah not to know Yahowah's thoughts. Further, because He is an eternal being, there can't be a date Yahowsha doesn't know. As God, He was there during creation, and He has already been to our future. In fact, in this very discussion, He has told us exactly what would happen prior to and during His return. So it's absurd for Him not to know what He has just predicted. Therefore, I reject this interpretation and blame those who copyedited Yahowah's testimony for the confusion. After all, current scholarship confirms over 300,000 known variations and alterations between The Textus Receptus and older manuscripts.
>God God's not who you think he is. God is not your god. You are misappropriating the name of God and giving it to the Jew-god Yahweh. Godan ( God or ᚷᛟᛞ ) is the chief god among many others in the polytheistic Germanic pantheon. God is not a title, it is the Lombardic ( shortend ) name of Godan, or more commonly, Wodan. God is named after the Germanic god Wodan ( ᚹᛟᛞᚨᚾ ) and the Norse allfather of the gods, Oðinn. Like it or not, the name God doesn't come from Judeo-Christian origins. When the early Jewish missionaries were teaching Christianity, they originated a name-changing strategy to eradicate the native Germanic religion by tricking the white natives into signing over their souls to the Jew's god. Today's obedient Christians continue to follow the Jew's tactic and persist in using Godan's name instead of Yahweh.
good post, but how does this tie into other precepts? knowing that the son does in fact know the time? is it even relevant?
>255756684 reply hidden
Isaac Watson
automated spam bot always appears in any Christian thread to post his copyapasta and Israeli propaganda
Josiah Reyes
The second option, one predicated on the removal of "not even the Son," requires us to assume that Yahowah's Heavenly attendants, conscripts, and warriors, who are eternal spirits and thus able to see the past, present, and future simultaneously, have no interest in knowing the timing of the most important event in world history. And since Yahowsha says in the same passage that these servants announce His arrival, it's not reasonable to assume they don't know when they are supposed to perform their duties. This universally ignorant interpretation also requires us to question why Yahowah would provide an overwhelming amount of details specific to His plan and His timeline and yet not want us to understand any of it. Confronted with a remarkable number of useful clues and one poorly rendered passage which seems to negate their purpose, Christian theologians have almost universally held up their little grain of sand while ignoring the mountain looming behind them. I remain convinced, nevertheless, that Yahowah is not telling us that He considers us so stupid that we are unable to see the clues He has provided for us.
Our third alternative is so obvious that in 1707 John Mill, the first modern theologian to consider its implications within the context of Yahowah's timeline, concluded accurately that the verb oida in Mattanyah 24:36 was rendered in the present tense. So Yahowsha was not saying that no one has ever known, nor that no one would ever recognize the day, but only that no one at that moment in time was aware of it. Worth noting is that not only did Mill close the case on closed mindedness with this analysis, his continued investigations prompted him to question the accuracy of The Textus Receptus. It is reported that he personally found 30,000 errors in that universally accepted, and yet overwhelmingly flawed, document which still underlies all English bible translations.
Connor Torres
>Israeli propaganda Why would Israel post what I did? No answer expected because Christfags are cowards and liars.
Easton Carter
beware the scribes indeed. recall in kings, the kenites were brought to the temple and made scribes over the tribe of judah.
Ryan Richardson
Therefore, "no one" in Yahowsha's audience and population at the time of His revelation "recognized, appreciated, acknowledged, saw, perceived, discerned, noticed or knew relationally" the predicted day when He was planning to return. This was absolutely true then and almost universally so today. Virtually no one recognizes this "specific and definite, unique and certain, sequential day." After all, thanks to Catholics, Yowm Kippurym, Yahowah's Day of Reconciliations, has been replaced by Halloween.
The reason for this ubiquitous ignorance is that as a rule, Christians don't study Yahowsha's message in the context of Yah's Covenant promises, causing them not to be able to connect important fulfillments to the Miqra’ey, Yahowah's Seven Called-Out Assembly Meetings. They don't even know what the Miqra’ey are! (Hopefully, by this time, you do.) Moreover, they don't understand the timeline of In the Beginning / Ba'reshyth / Genesis 1 or its prophetic implications. And not one in a thousand connects the parallel passages in ZecharYah to Mattanyah. So Christians don't recognize what's going to happen or when, and most Jews, secular humanists, atheists, Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists have no interest in this subject at all.
The fourth option relative to understanding this passage is tied to the fact that Yahowsha quickly transitioned in the Olivet Discourse to a discussion regarding the Taruw'ah harvest. In the case of the harvest, the day of the year when the ingathering will occur is known, but the year itself is not known. And while Yahowah and Yahowsha know the timing, there is no way for man to discern it from Scripture. All we can know for sure is that it will occur on the Feast of Taruw'ah/Trumpets some time between now and September 12, 2026.
Because Israelis hate Jesus Christ and slander him constantly just like you. Nobody but a hardcore Judaism zealot would spam that copy pasta as much as you + that image you posted was made by Israelis.
