Redpill Thread Part 2

Last one was archived but was CRUSHING

Keep it up in this one

Post your redpills

Attached: aquinas.jpg (700x6826, 600.5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/253914205
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/254025845
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/254307067
youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98
youtube.com/watch?v=BB6PDZNdg7g
youtube.com/watch?v=3lSjXhMUVKE
youtube.com/watch?v=XytkI7afHcQ
youtube.com/watch?v=Mm-Dm4pO0xY
youtube.com/watch?v=_1OgxfCT044
bitchute.com/video/mWIkLhcH2aB4/
youtube.com/watch?v=dP0-YohJR-g
youtube.com/watch?v=kjOH1XMAwZA
youtube.com/watch?v=tx72tAWVcoM
youtu.be/XNWF9CeoZdE
youtube.com/watch?v=Mj0ixxrAb7A
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 6 stages of temptation.jpg (828x640, 226.91K)

Attached: the ideal consumer 2.png (1876x4500, 876.68K)

Attached: feminism.png (1500x3719, 594.72K)

Attached: 1551400426073m.jpg (838x1024, 219.96K)

Attached: 1551141916009m.jpg (1024x1019, 209.59K)

Attached: shtf.jpg (1489x2935, 996.33K)

Text pill 1/2 : consciousness edition

Sokolowksi illustrates this idea further utilizing an innovative analogy. The brain and nervous system function, he maintains, much like a transparent lens. When a lens works properly, it refracts and presents that which is beyond it, whether that is a newspaper or the Andromeda galaxy light years away. Unlike a television screen that creates that which is seen, a lens serves as the physical medium through which what is seen is conveyed.When I hold up a magnifying glass at arm’s length, and gaze into it looking at the wall opposite me through the lens, the image that seems to appear in the glass is not actually in the glass like the image on a TV screen, but rather is actually out there, beyond the glass. With the TV screen, I behold a representation, an image of the real thing, but not the thing itself. But with a lens, what I see in the glass is not something representing the wall, but rather the wall as wall, but in a specifically non-physical way. The lens, then, serves as a physical medium through which the external world of matter-form composites is conveyed and known.Applying this analogy to the mind and the brain, we can begin to grasp the complex interrelation of soul and body. The brain and the nervous system are the physical medium through which the external world is accessible and knowable to the immaterial mind, not as the result of a secondary stage of re-presentation, but in a single, concomitant moment. The mind needs the brain for it is in accordance with human nature that we come to knowledge and understanding of the world through our physicality and the corporeality of things. This lensing analogy is also helpful in the negative sense, for if the lens is damaged, or misshapen, it cannot convey its object clearly or without distortion. So too when the brain is damaged, the extra-mental world of matter-form composites is not as easily accessible or knowable, and perhaps even opaque to the mind.

Text pill 2/2:

The intellect and the brain are wedded together, with the brain and nervous system acting like transparent lenses, not giving themselves, but rather giving that which is beyond them and other. It is only by being interwoven in the body that the mind, the I, can come to know anything, and, furthermore, it is only by encountering corporeal things, through the senses, that we are ever able to attain knowledge of the incorporeal. Therefore, to posit any separation between the mind and the brain, or, to posit any theory that considers the two identical, is incorrect. We conclude that the brain, though an absolutely necessary cause, is not a sufficient cause for the human mind.

Attached: patton papers.jpg (2273x4698, 1.99M)