To believe in "black holes" you must be a schizo. It requires a schizo mind. It requires doublethink.
"Black holes" violate Einstein's Relativity theories (let's just pretend they're correct), yet in the institutionalized "settled science" dogma, they simultaneously believe in Relativity. And "black holes" (as defined by the "black hole" believers themselves) can't exist in a Big Bang Universe, yet they simultaneously believe in the Big Bang. And by the official "black hole" """science""" there can't be /multiple/ "black holes" in the same universe simultaneously, yet they believe there are. It's 100% schizo and idiotic.
Institutionalized "settled science" followers are basically religious - they ignore any science and facts which contradicts their belief system.
To everyone who wish to learn and educate themselves, here's an excellent scientific paper describing the problems and contradictions with "black holes" and Relativity: files.catbox.moe/b3aur6.pdf
And here are great educational videos for those who don't want to read (all the following is based on /real science/ and observations of facts, as opposed to the "settled science" dogma):
Is this a discussion on the dirac model and how modeling for the virtual particles makes much more sense as a temporal component than trying to have them as paired ahnialation?
For those curious Virtual particles define "space" Like a bowl of skittles, the space between the skittles cant be counted But if you have smaller skittles you can fill that area in and count it THus you can quantify space But this doesnt work since edgewise pair couples exist only long enough to ahnialate in the next planc and thus cant do anything You cant measure them and they cant interact So quite obviously that doesnt work to have something in space
Dirac's model instead defined space as a series of energy values, 0 for true empty, and everything else for the different particles THis one had an interesting part in that if the energy exceeded a certain point, like a singularity, it then stretched into time Which wraps up much neater
Jonathan Jackson
>"Black holes" violate Einstein's Relativity theories stopped reading there
