Are 3D printed guns a meme...

Are 3D printed guns a meme? Or are they a tool that the bongs will use to finally overthrow their government and take back their island?

Attached: 22f9a1c2-b514-4349-88b2-de161282dd82.jpg (2220x1080, 117.16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lbry.tv/@Deterrence-Dispensed:2
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Delete this

NO

lbry.tv/@Deterrence-Dispensed:2

> print many guns while you still can

>Are 3D printed guns a meme?
mostly yeah
the technology isn't there for massive easy production

It makes more sense metal machining a real gun for what it takes to make a reliable plastic gun.

>while you still can

Attached: you wouldnt download a car.jpg (616x364, 32.34K)

One of the methods used by abusive stalker types like those who combine prediction markets with surveillance is to use as evidence that their tactics are acceptable the fact that their victims don't commit suicide.

Here's your 3D printed gun.

Attached: plastic_gun.jpg (400x400, 41.3K)

Continued engagement doesn't always prove acceptability. Problems that cannot be evaded are not being consented to when they are confronted, nor even is a sufficiently difficult possibility of evasion the same as consent.

Furthermore, there is an ethical obligation to prevent the misuse of certain categories of data which can result in giving people the opportunity to "voluntarily" share it being an act of severe authoritarianism.

They'll be a meme until a FULLY printed gun can withstand the force of multiple gunshots.
People have also been experimenting (unsuccessfully) with printed ammunition casings, if THAT ever takes off then that will be something incredible. But I kind of doubt it'll ever work.

When systems are used by corrupt governments and criminal organizations to identify weaknesses in the psychology of their opponents, defenders of integrity and anti-authoritarians alike should unite in calling for those systems to be shut down.

Are there any "low-stress" and "recreational" systems in the world today which might be used to assemble political response profiles to discover what people might "consent" to?

If so, which if any of those systems would shut down if they discovered that they were making data available to repressive actors?

Owning that lethal weapon here would get you 5-10 years hard labour.

What about 3D printing metal guns instead of plastic?

>the force of multiple gunshots.
AND accurately delivery its load.
AND delivering it with required impact (lethal or otherwise)

Not completely a meme but the realistic use case is tiny and exclusively for retards.

Retarded shit like the Liberator is a psyop to distract you from the fact that you can print an AR lower (the part the gubmint thinks is the actual "firearm") relatively easily and fill it out with an off-the-shelf parts kit and other legal and mostly unregulated components like barrel, stock, trigger assembly and it will work fine. Polymer lowers exist, they're shit, but they'll work in a pinch and any printer will be able to at least approximate what you could buy elsewhere.

If you live in a country where you can't get the above components without a license or glownigger approval then you're fucked and no shitty 3D printer is going to change that.

If you live in America and are thinking about 3D printing a lower you're retarded because you could mill out an 80% lower with less effort and a less expensive tool than even the shittiest plastic printer and produce an aluminum lower 10x better than a printed piece of shit.

Attached: amerimutt.png (602x602, 235.41K)

That'd probably work, but it kind of defeats the purpose of printed weapons to begin with, which is that it's simple, easily affordable for any ol' modern peasant, and doesn't take up much space.
Metal printers aren't too much bigger than plastic ones, but they're crazy expensive at least by comparison. It's not something for the masses.

You can make a sten out of fucking oven pipe parts in the shed.

Ammo is the hardest to make I'd imagine.

Most non-Burgerland countries regulate gun parts much differently. USA is kind of weird, as we regulate the receiver as the "gun" legally, and whatever is the receiver by ATF definition is the gun. In most other countries, what's legally the gun is the breach area of the barrel and/or the barrel itself. Sometimes the bolt/slide itself. This is actually mainly to allow deactivating a gun without mutilating it ATF approved plasma cutter style on parts kits, so you can display war trophies or historical firearms without having an actual functioning firearm. In UK this was a major thing for a while for black market guns (how much were actually used in crime, who knows) as US could freely export barrels and breaches, and UK left receivers in tact legally. It also causes issues with some airsoft/pellet rifles, Saiga made air rifle AKs that got banned in USA for using real AK receivers, and it's a non-issue in other countries for this reason.

So the whole 3D printed lower AR-15 receiver is in fact a meme basically everywhere but USA, as the upper receiver or bolt of an AR-15 is legally considered the firearm in most places besides USA and I guess Canada.

Also for ordering said upper receivers, the government still has your credit card purchases/etc to get logs from if needed. You can't really just walk to Wal-Mart and plop down cash no questions asked for an AR upper, though I do live in a fairly liberal state so who knows how it is in other places here in the Burgerland.

You’d be better off buying a mill and a lathe

checked

Does being queer still get you that?

That's why you make a slam fire shotgun and make paper shells

Black powder guns are the way to go in countries with no ammo.

>Metal printers aren't too much
You can mix ALL the metal powder you want with ALL the resin binder you can find, it is not the same as forged metal.

>finally overthrow their government
The only thing mutts are talking about yet they can't even put a decent protest up

Cowards. Fuck yourself, the bongs are a billion times more respectable than (((you)))

In Belgium and France you can buy black powder guns without license or anything, are they really worth it?

A bullet that killed in 1864 will kill in 2020. You do the math.

Attached: arizona rangers.jpg (950x562, 194.84K)

Good for guerilla warfare/ hit and runs, not for a mass shooting.
Fire rate would be awful.

Yes, modern black powder guns are pretty fucking good. They aren’t like muskets from 250 years ago. You can also make your own powder pretty easily

Good info here.

I am speaking as a burger because a burger is all I have been and will ever be but even in the most cucked states you should be able to buy an upper and any other component that the ATF does not consider a "firearm" with cash and without getting your ID entered into a database. I don't know if WalMart or other corporate retail vendors have "policies" in place to prevent this (they probably do) because I don't buy from them but smaller stores are likely to be less anal and there are always gun shows. Personally I don't worry about glowies tracking my purchases on things that don't require an FFL.