Ok so my theory here is that the story of Cain and Able? If you aren't familiar with the story a basic rundown is they were the first two brothers EVER. Very first. And Cain killed Able cursing him and all of his decendents. Traditionally Children of Cain have been considered the Blacks. But what if it is a remenant of a story older than that? What if Cain and Able were really about Homo sapians and Neanderthals. And we are all actually children of Cain? Idk just wanted your thoughts.
Racism, Is actually Specism
Other urls found in this thread:
theopenscroll.com
twitter.com
you forget that Adam and Eve had 1 more son after Cain killed Able. He's the progenitor of Huwhites. They even had to hide him from Cain, in fear that he'd kill him too.
>bruh what if
Then literally nothing happens
What species would this be, and why is it allowed to vote and breed?
White people are the descendants of Adam and Eve. The rest, evolved from apes. Black people remained unmixed and so still carry most of their ape like features while the other subhuman races mixed with the descendants of Adam and Eve.
>Racism, Is actually Specism
ok I'm listening
>Ok so my theory here is that the story of Cain and Ab-
Sage
Yeah when noah landed on Mount ararat (Arian ) in the Caucasian mountain range his 3 sons created all white races. Shem went east to Mesopotamia. Ham started Egypt and japhesh went north to Europe. The bible is the history of our white family. Our birthright . Just read up. Every time we stray from God we are invaded by "beasts with hands" niggers etc. Multiculturalism is the biggest slap in God's face. That is saying satanists and animal niggers with no holy spirit are our equals...
True. The Negro is not a descendant of Adam and Eve, therefore is not a man; but he is descended from the beasts, therefore no Negro has any right of a human being. The other subhuman races are mixed and therefore, are halfway between man and beast which excludes them from having the full rights of a human being
bump
>Racism, Is actually Specism
race and species are two different things.
Elaborate please
Cain's children intermingled with Adam's other kids and one of Cain's descendants was Noah, who's kids were the only survivors of the flood. I believe it gives Noah's ancestors in genesis 6 but I may be wrong. Technically we are all children of Cain.
When a population splits into two different groups, seperated by geography or other natural barriers, thus preventing breeding between those two populations... they eventually begin diverging genetically.
Over a large enough time, the two populations aquire phenotypes (physical traits) that are shared by the entirety of one of the populations, but not found in any of the other population.
At this point, the two populations can be referred to as different "Sub-Species" or "races" of a species.
If this genetic divergance continues with no mixing of the two populations, EVENTUALLY the populations are no longer able to breed between them while producing viable offspring.
Once two populations are no longer capable of interbreeding, they are defined as different species.
Most of this is high school level biology.
Yes I know about that. I even used this explanation on pol but you see what differentiates a species is a human construct. Polar bears and grizzly bears are considered to be different species but can breed to produce a fertile offspring.
Toynbee’s interpretation was that it was settled agriculturists smiting nomadic peoples
>what differentiates a species is a human construct
not being able to breed is a biological construct.
Idk what was Michal Jackson?
and where would i find that?
>
>race and species are two different things.
Oh yeah sure
its all bs
we were fashioned from animals, and genetically created to by slaves for an alien race.
Blacks from chimps
whites from pigs
middle eastern, north african, persian, kike all come from rats.
Asians are from Fish not insects like everyone here says.
Like I said, there are distinct groups of animals that are considered to be different species but it was found that they can breed to produce fertile a offspring.
Nice cherrypicking. They can still breed together and are >93% similar genetically
Yes I agree
>t was found that they can breed to produce fertile a offspring.
source?
not that it matters, if they can breed to produce viable offspring, they will no longer be considered different species, but different sub-species within a species group.
That's just how the terms are defined.
I'd soooo want to be certain I was speaking 100% truth on very arguable details before ever saying something like this I do acknowledge your lack of care in playing this theory out and talking as if you live by it's 100% obvious truth
>this is high level biology
>2 posts later
>not being able to breed is a biological construct in reply to polar bears and grizzly bears being able to breed
the state of this board, holy fuck this is the most retarded thread i've ever seen
Maybe Satan was Cain's father. This guy thinks Satan fucked Eve AND Adam. Then, Adam fucked Eve when she was pregnant with Satan's baby. Then Eve had twins:
He makes a good case:
theopenscroll.com
Yeah namefag memeflaggot these dogs can also breed together.
That was that Korean chick singer with a man's name, right?
user is saying that if animals that may differ in appearance and physical adaptions are able to breed, the human concept for 'specie/race' loses meaning
You're unable to comprehend a borderline highschool tier concept and are talking about 'high level biology'
>user is saying that if animals that may differ in appearance and physical adaptions are able to breed, the human concept for 'specie/race' loses meaning
No, it doesnt.
If they can breed they are just a different race.
if they can't breed, they are a different species.
this is how the words are defined.
what is so difficult to understand about this concept?
You are walking down a wrong path if you accept any of the darwinian story as true. You will arrive at wrong conclusions no matter how smart or deep your deductions are, because your very foundations are kiked. Darwinism was and is plan of the Jews (see the protocols) to destroy Christian culture. It has nothing to do with science. Today more so than ever the lack of evidence for Darwinism is more blatant than ever. So, if you want to pursue your theory, whatever it is, you must start from a sound base, Darwinism is not.
Biologists still consider polar and grizzly bears to be distinct species even if they are able to breed and produce fertile offsprings. Other notable examples include the eastern coyote which is a hybrid between the normal coyote and a wolf; zorse, a zebra-horse hybrid is fertile too even though their parents belong to distinct species. The normal definition of a species usually works reasonably well for many vertebrates, for example, but for creatures like plants, fungi, protists and bacteria can get murky. Of course, pol would love to consider black people to be a distinct species from white people.
There are whites, and there are caucasoids, who are brown skinned middle easterners, turks, north indians, afghanis, etc. Then there are Blacks and East Asians. How do they fit into your theory of Cain and Abel?
why are YOU allowed to post your black nigger retard bullshit as stupid as claiming that S O Y isnt bad for you and that swhy mods cenosred it and also claimed that it was over paul joseph watson and also claimed that "duh gumbint says it sfake".
threads but we cant post fuck niggers threads?
Interesting, I always assumed the human race was one collective race because they can reproduce with one another
Thank you random brainlet for shining light on your understanding of things
>Interesting, I always assumed the human race was one collective race because they can reproduce with one another
the term you are looking for is species.
we are all the same species.
we are different races, though.
Brown skinned people and chinks are halfway between human beings and apes. Whites are human and black people are apes.
Wait, Are you two implying that bears can be racist?
if so thats the best thing I've seen in a long time
You could even consider race to be a human construct. inb4 fuck off libtard. Let me explain. Race is a continuous trait and changes gradually across a region. The genetic makeup of people do not change greatly on the other side of the border. A greek man will be genetically closer to a turk than to an irish man simply because they have lived closer together for a long time. Black people and mongoloid people look different because they were geographically isolated for thousands of years. The sahara desert isolated black people and siberia and central asian mountains isolated mongoloid people.
Based schizo. You should cut your internet cable
Well animals are animals. They are hostile even to their own species who are outside their tribe or family. Racism is actually a biological instinct. We are more favourable to people who think like us, share the same value as us and look similar to us.
>Race is a continuous trait and changes gradually across a region.
you're talking about the Galapagos island observations that Darwin made?
the racial boundaries within a species are fairly closely tied with geographic features, specifically those features that traditionally have been difficult to pass, and thus no breeding between the two geographically isolated populations could occur, allowing the slow accumulation of mutations from genetic drift to change the two populations into different races, and eventually with enough time, different species.
The human language by definition is a useful way to record human understanding, it's logical concepts, but how much his understanding of the physical object is gauged by someone else's concept is down to your own intelligence, you're completely correct in your isolation creating adaptations/divergence belief