Worlds smartest man DESTROYS atheists

How will you brainlets recover??

Attached: Christopher Langan smartest man religion athiesm.jpg (474x223, 23.76K)

Why is langan so relatable bros?

He’s a high IQ NEET who’s smart enough to see problems and totally powerless to fix any of them.

He’s literally just another one of us.

that doesn't make a loop
this man is a fraud
these ideas are simple and not remarkable at all

Underachiever

>in the beginning was the word, and the word was with God (script from which all things were procedurally generated), also other waters, other firmaments (multiverse)
Atheist: BOOOOOOOOO
>we are all made of stardust, you are stardust, also simulation theory (script from which all things are generated + sci-fi spin and multiverse)
Atheist: SOOOO COOOOOOOOL!!!

>okay, so evolution is true, but I can mental gymnastics Genesis enough so that I don't have to pick a side. I'm smart guys, trust me.
Oh.

Yeah.
It's fuckin pretty stupid

Life becomes a hell of a lot easier once you embrace and internalize this.

>believes in things with no evidence
>smartest man

YIKES

I know what you mean, usually people with such an outlier IQ are weirdo's. Yet Logan is normal.
I put it down to him have muscles among other things. It lets you understand your limits, removes physical inferiority complexes.

A closed loop as in, God does not constantly have to intervene in humanities evolution, he set up a process that lead to humanity from before the start of the universe. Closed loop.

>these ideas are simple and not remarkable at all

It's a very Jewish argument that the most novel/complex idea is correct. And it is very disingenuous to say it is 'bad' because it is simple, he probably put in a lot of effort to make this idea simple for you and for the average person to understand. Yet to attack it because it doesn't give you a little dopamine high from feeling intellectually superior to the average man.

It's called deductive reasoning.

believing in things with no evidence is the opposite of deductive reasoning

Believing every word in the bible happened is a heresy that Protestantism adopted. Actual Christians know some parts of the bible are metaphorical while other parts really happened.
Genesis is metaphorical.

Attached: catholics.jpg (3000x1705, 1.11M)

Attached: 101815EC-FEFC-4EC0-A26E-0069F657A8FB.jpg (750x611, 182.35K)

He isn’t that smart if he believes in evolution

Genesis isn't the Bible. It's the Torah.

Evolution was ever only a problem for Abrahamics.

Catholicism is paganism with Christian names.

>God

If you think live gotten that part out of the way, WHICH god? There’s at least five or six major monotheist gods and several variants of the Christian God.

You're thinking of inductive.

You can use deductive reasoning to say God exists. And you so this by analyzing how the universe is and how humans are.
Ever noticed how the most messed up souls don't believe or follow Gods teaching?
Why do you think that is? Why are those who reject God punished this way?

Attached: progress gay.png (1438x1280, 1.56M)

>the bouncer with deep psychological issues who spent years of his life training to game IQ tests and wrote one of the cringiest philosophy papers to ever exist is a superstitious nutjob
wow
colour me surprised.

Huh, that "brain thought" is very old and not considered "intelligent". Anyone can come to this conclusion if all you do is argue objectively.

Cry moar

Attached: chris langan iq comparison.jpg (400x193, 16.24K)

Can langan explain which god is real? Are they all real or is there a real one we dont know about?

T. Atheist

Attached: 1563032017194.jpg (1024x635, 246.81K)

he is saying that god exists because man created him. most ops can't keep up with langan.

That sooper inteeligeence he uses for his media hype is his only selling point, and the only thing he's ever done with it is throw drunks out of bars.

i don't follow him- i get bits and pieces from others posts. but from what i can tell, langan and i share the same thoughts on god.
god isn't skydaddy. skydaddy doesn't exist. god is a single-syllable reference for "everything". but since everything is too broad a term, we sometimes have to dig a little deeper into subjects to understand the world around us. evolution is a good example. but evolution is simply the observation and explanation of a group of processes. it can't define everything.
taking everything at-once is too much to parse. so call it all god and go see whats to snack on in the refrigerator.

>high iq
>can't even have a baby with his wife
All for nothing

Attached: A95A4E4B-55DE-4BC1-9F05-A6396C746FBE.jpg (700x503, 101.7K)

>You can use deductive reasoning to say God exists
Not without logical flaws or fallacies.

>Why are those who reject God punished this way?
Atheists are vastly underrepresented in prisons.

you never asked him to fix any problems. try asking him directly some time.

(You) needs to be in parenthesis

He can believe whatever he wants. He still can't prove God exists, because no proof exists. Therefore the entire point is irrelevant.

Attached: 1335894008599.jpg (300x300, 46.62K)

>god exists because man created him
Depends on what you mean. Did we create or discover the triangle? Whatever answer you give the same is true of God. We pick and choose properties of reality to associate with a concept but the properties already existed.

>Not without logical flaws or fallacies.
>>Why are those who reject God punished this way?
>Atheists are vastly underrepresented in prisons.

Attached: 1576413174178s.jpg (124x125, 1.72K)