They are doing this because trump stands for everything hate. But what did people even hate about trump in the first place?
All he said was he wanted to make america gre,at again and place the american people first.
Oliver Rodriguez
>to the dozens of you likely molested by my candidate, please vote for him anyway
Isaiah Clark
PS. Biden just fisted my butthole.
Jaxon Sanchez
I took a polygraph once and lied several times throughout the questioning and still didn’t get caught. Polygraphs are easily passed by people who have sociopathic or psychopathic tendencies, or even people who just simply believe their own lies.
There is no science to it. It’s all garbage, smoke and mirrors. They take a statement or previously obtained information and use it to build questions to ask you. The whole time they are looking for you to recant or alter your answers in some way. Polygraphs are not admissible in court for a reason and it’s because they are so easily manipulated by both the polygrapher and the subject being polygraphed.
Lucas Gonzalez
>All he said was he wanted to make america gre,at again and place the american people first. Dude, come on. Not shilling but he did say some provocative stuff. They can hae him but their hatred made them blind. They have intellectual tunnelvision now and are permaseething. That's really not healthy. I dread the day, whenever it maybe when the Dems get back in power. They will go on a complete revenge rampage.
Jace Watson
Believe all women, unless they're claiming they were assaulted by a Democrat.
It's literally worse than flipping a coin to determine truth. It doesn't even make sense. The study that got it banned from courtroom use literally found it was worse than 50%. So in theory they could completely reverse all of their criteria and improve it.
>But what did people even hate about trump in the first place?
Look at his mannerisms, look at how he appeals to working class hillbillies from Alabama, look at his lack of aesthetics and choice of diction: Look at his disregard for high society.
During her testimony, Ford stated under oath that she has never coached anyone on taking a lie detector test. “Never,” she replied when prosecutor Rachel Mitchell asked whether she had offered advice to any individual planning to submit to a polygraph examination.
On Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee said it had received a sworn statement from a man claiming to be Ford’s former boyfriend, whose name is redacted from his letter, saying he personally witnessed Ford coaching a friend for a polygraph test.
“During some of the time we were dating, Dr. Ford lived with Monica L. McLean, who I understood to be her life-long best friend,” the letter read. “During that time, it was my understanding that McLean was interviewing for jobs with the FBI and the US Attorney’s Office. I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam. Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of her background in psychology.”
“I do not want to become involved in this process or current investigation, but wanted to be truthful about what I know,” the man wrote.
Ford and this man supposed dated for six years, and he says Ford never expressed a fear of flying or of closed spaces, traits she told the committee she struggles with. ...
The former boyfriend’s statement “raises specific concerns about the reliability of her polygraph examination results,” the Republican senator wrote. “Dr. Ford cited the results of this polygraph examination to support her allegations. It’s unfair to rely on the results of a polygraph examination while withholding the materials necessary to assess the accuracy of the results.”
It's not so much about the perpetrator, except that it's a man, not so much about the victim, except that it's a woman. This is how symbolism works. Democrats carry the torch of #Metoo against Republicans, then they switch places, it's a marathon run. Everyone gets to be part of it because it is an initiation of sorts. For society to be inverted, for the family unit to be forgotten, these things must pass, regardless of whether the inciting incidents are real or fake. To them there is only purpose.
>When I sent the #MeToo tweet which helped spark a movement by amplifying the work of Tarana Burke in 2017 jesus christ, imagine if that's all Jefferson or King had done
Jayden Ross
Ah right I remember that now. It didnt phase me because I have thick skin after playing video games. Yes my days being assaulted constantly online into become mean made me blind to that. Also i like your picture. it goes real smooth
Nolan Miller
>Believing women was never about “Believe all women no matter what they say,” it was about changing the culture of NOT believing women by default. t. Actress and activist Alyssa Milano
>Beating Trump will be greater for women in the long run
this has to be bait
Joseph Perry
All anecdotal nonsense you can't show anyone because none of ut is true. You don't like his "mannerisms"? What the fuck is your problem? What mannerisms show me. "He doesn't like high society " um when did he say that? The guy who made billions buying golf resorts so Jewish billionaires could pay him money? Let's say Trump said "I hate all high society " how the fuck does that make him a bad person you literal fucking retarded, mind numbing faggot. How do you keep the drool in your mouth exactly?
Christopher Long
I dont understand it myself but I see my friends in video games say slightly rude things and the other players go absolutely nuts. They say they are navy captains and are going to track him down. you might not get why his mannerisms are bad, I might not either, but somehow others did. I think its cuz theyre in denial about their true nature
I really don't get why people continue to give this idiot attention, she was educated on a TV set thru maybe 7th-grade and is literally a tax-evading apologist/whore for Hollywood
Levi Campbell
>Believing women was never about “Believe all women no matter what they say,” it was about changing the culture of NOT believing women by default.
Imagine for a moment, being such a smoothbrain that you think OP is serious about these positions and not just trying to troll you into a pitchfork-grabbing rage over Alyssa Milano's hypocrisy
polygraphs are not even admissible in court because they're junk-science, an interrogation tool, you fucking idiot
Jace Sanchez
this article 'living in gray' was legitimately her saying it is unfair that people called her out for being a hypocrite. "It’s not up to women to admonish or absolve perpetrators, or be regarded as complicit when we don’t denounce them" this sentence basically sums it up, where she legitimizes supporting a rapist and says how it is bullshit that she is attacked for not sticking to her convictions.
Grayson Ross
alisame el ano
Robert Smith
Its strange she put makeup knowing that she was planning on crying. Well such is acting
I agree women had it rough but when it worked, bad people saw a chance to abuse this power. I think in 300 years after the seesaw stabilizes, we'll be better off. If people had better memories though itd only take like 5 year. no stats or proof coming tho sryy