Here are the only two major scientific studies ever performed on WTC 7. One of them gives you full access to all of their analysis, so that you can check for yourself. The other one does not give you access to their analysis, and therefore is meaningless, scientifically. Their claims therefore hold ZERO weight.
I dare anyone to say with a straight face that WTC7 fell over due to fire. This is a scientific discussion, so don't talk about the twin towers or jets or jews or explosives unless it's relevant to WTC7.
How did the Rothschild family (Jewish, have a street named after them in Israel, worship Talmud) begin to own the Oil Fields in Kirkuk Iraqi Kurdistan?
Logan Collins
>NIST’s computer modelling cannot be independently verified because NIST has refused to re-lease a large portion of its modelling data on the basis that doing so “might jeopardize public safety.” What did they mean by that?
Hey grandpa this event is going on 20 years old now. Too bad for you I read the PDF right after the fact of the named projectiles and the floors that they entered and an analysis of what deficiencies in the building allowed the whole building to come down because of it.
The forensic scientists did their work, the insurance claim went through after the most meticulous analysis those employees had ever done. And the owner of the building re invested it in the area.
Maybe you can try to pivot to chemtrails or pyramid power or something. This shit is tired.
Juan Clark
First day moshe?
Noah Cook
The insurance claim was 20 years ago.
What is your goal? To undo the insurance claim and fulfillment? The building was sold at firesale prices as a total loss after the insurance came through.
Certainly there are better ways to spend your time than irritating about ancient history?
Why not irritate about something more substantial like say the ice age 400 thousand years ago?
Alexander Thompson
NPCs get a blue screen error when you tell them 3 towers fell
>WTC7 fell over nope. it fell straight down due to fire.
Aiden Myers
Has anyone tested a resonance theory? if i was the powers that be, I'd try to explain away building 7 by justifying it like the tacoma narrows bridge, muh resonance from crashing steel from falling buildings
But when i heard of the gold or what ever in the vaults there, alongside cancelation of the pentagon audit for missing trillions (memory is getting foggy) or what not i knew then it would alot to convince me of any theory to how this building achieve free fall for how long?
Seemed all too connected
Jayden Morgan
WTC 7 is the headquarters for the clown world. Think about it, no plane hit it and it fell straight down as if it was a remote controlled demolition. 20 years later nobody knows about it
and to this day remains the only steel framed building to do so.
Mason Lewis
give me one proof you can demolish a steel frame skyscraper
Daniel Richardson
youtube.com/watch?v=9eTzV7HvKHU so in this footage check out when the plane hits the second tower but try to have a look at between the towers if the plane ever passes or if it even looks as if it's approaching at the right angle but more importantly WTC7 has been solved >pancake waves
Blake Parker
No plane hit building 7
The National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded in their report on Building 7: "While debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7."
NIST admits that Building 7 is the first time a building over 15 stories tall has EVER collapsed due to fires.
NIST admits to a free fall acceleration over 2.25 seconds.
The official 9/11 Commission Report does not discuss Building 7 NIST refuses to release data inputs for their computational collapse model, saying it "...might jeopardize public safety."
How? By revealing that there are explosives planted in every skyscraper in the US?
Jack Murphy
Anything that points out the deep state's ownage of the government jeopardizes national security, user.
John Kelly
Why would the insane clown posse use another law enforcer as a cover?
Christopher Ross
Lots of 5s and 6s... but who knows, maybe to spread the 'involvement' around so that more people are controlled by IF I GO DOWN, SO DO YOU?
Dominic Howard
There was certainly some lateral ground movement when the two towers collapsed. tower 7 was hours later, so the idea that it would be vibrating at it's fundamental period makes no sense. It's not a comparable situation to the Tacoma Narrows bridge. There is no other explanation than it's a cover up. Mechanics is not a hidden science that only the government knows. You didn't address my arguments at all. Please stick to the topic if you want to actually say something. >might jeopardize public safety Which makes no sense. With enough effort, you can usually get structural engineering plans of any building on earth. It's not a secret how these things are built, in fact, it's important that everyone has a chance to see what's happening in them. This is the ONE building nobody is allowed to know anything about.
