You're wrong, of course. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Knowing everything I know about Jews now I really, really...
Thomas Hall
Adam Butler
just shitposting m8 meant to quote you and the memeflag but I fucked up. brb, gotta go commit sudoku
Joseph Sanchez
>Jews are actually ok
Ryder Parker
There are good Jews I am sure, there are good niggers too, but as a people, as a group, what they as a group leave behind...
Austin Peterson
You don't know very much about Jews then. Their intelligence is fearsome.
Alexander Hall
einstein was a smart cookie but of course he had contemporaries whose work ran along similar lines
>Much of his work at the patent office related to questions about transmission of electric signals and electrical–mechanical synchronization of time, two technical problems that show up conspicuously in the thought experiments that eventually led Einstein to his radical conclusions about the nature of light and the fundamental connection between space and time.
Ethan James
To believe in "black holes" you must be a schizo. It requires a schizo mind. It requires doublethink.
"Black holes" violate Einstein's Relativity theories (let's just pretend they're correct), yet in the institutionalized "settled science" dogma, they simultaneously believe in Relativity. And "black holes" (as defined by the "black hole" believers themselves) can't exist in a Big Bang Universe, yet they simultaneously believe in the Big Bang. And by the official "black hole" """science""" there can't be /multiple/ "black holes" in the same universe simultaneously, yet they believe there are. It's 100% schizo and idiotic.
Institutionalized "settled science" followers are basically religious - they ignore any science and facts which contradicts their belief system.
To everyone who wish to learn and educate themselves, here's an excellent scientific paper describing the problems and contradictions with "black holes" and Relativity: files.catbox.moe
And here are great educational videos for those who don't want to read (all the following is based on /real science/ and observations of facts, as opposed to the "settled science" dogma):
Julian Lopez
All alleged "black hole" models pertain to a universe that is spatially infinite, is eternal, contains only one mass, is not expanding, and is asymptotically flat or asymptotically not flat.
But the alleged "big bang" cosmology pertains to a universe that is spatially finite (one case) or spatially infinite (two different cases), is of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple black holes (some of which are supposedly primordial), is expanding, and is not asymptotically anything.
Thus black holes and the big bang contradict one another - they're mutually exclusive. This is undeniable and clear as day. It's surprisingly easy to prove that neither General Relativity nor Newton's theory predict black holes to exist.
Despite numerous claims for black holes in their millions, none has ever been discovered. It's also not difficult to prove General Relativity violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum. There are fundamental contradictions contained in black hole theory, big bang cosmology, as well as in General Relativity. Numerical methods are therefore meaningless.
Oh and for those who'd like to use the defense that in an expanding universe energy isn't conserved and thus the "energy conservation law" is false and therefore all criticism of Einstein's field equations are incorrect, friendly reminder to you that Einstein required his field equations to satisfy the usual conservation of energy and momentum.
To do so he introduced his pseudotensor which has been demonstrated to be entirely meaningless (see: files.catbox.moe
"Big bang" theory is based upon Einstein’s field equations. Since the field equations violate the usual conservation laws, the theory of a big bang is fundamentally flawed.
Kayden Bell
Therefore, invoking a "big bang" to attempt to circumvent the violation of the usual conservation laws is a circular argument and therefore completely invalid.
Furthermore, Einstein's field equations are nonlinear and so the principle of Superposition doesn't hold in General Relativity. But it does hold in Newton's theory.
Thus if X and Y are two different solutions to Einstein's field equations, then the linear combination of aX + bY, where a and b are scalars, isn't a solution. Physically this means that one can't simply pile up masses and radiation in any given spacetime to obtain multiple masses and radiation. Additionally, there are no solutions to Einstein's field equations for two or more masses and there is no existence theorem by which it can even be asserted that the field equations contain latent solutions for two or more masses. Thus it's not possible to insert a black hole universe into a big bang universe or into another black hole universe, or to insert a big bang universe into a black hole universe or another big bang universe.
Nevertheless, Einstein's followers routinely and incorrectly claim the existence of multiple black holes from objects such as stars by means of irresistible gravitational collapse.
Now read pic related if you want to understand all of this in depth.
Jonathan Hill
After view this picture, how can people not see that Hitler and the nazis was a kike funded Psyop. Hitler the guy who HATED jews and fought in ww1..... What did the jews get out of WW1? PALESTINE!!!! Fast forward to ww2 and hitler lets all teh rich jews pay off and run to Palestine....... What is formed from ww2? ISRAEL. There hasn't been a genuine Hitler, Prove me wrong.