Why don't environmentialists endorse nuclear power?

How is it economic for nuclear weapons? They have no economic value. Even if nuclear isn't as profitable as fossil fuels the government could subsidize it since the whole point of government is to solve for things the market can't.
I can't imagine it's any worse than coal, oil, or lithium.
Not to mention we can just give a bag of money to Elon Musk and have him make it disappear into the void of space.

>the whole point of government is to
see

>during the past 15 years there has been stagnation in the development of fast reactors in the industrialized countries that were involved, earlier, in intensive development of this area. All studies on fast reactors have been stopped in countries such as Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the only work being carried out is related to the decommissioning of fast reactors. Many specialists who were involved in the studies and development work in this area in these countries have already retired or are close to retirement. In countries such as France, Japan and the Russian Federation that are still actively pursuing the evolution of fast reactor technology, the situation is aggravated by the lack of young scientists and engineers moving into this branch of nuclear power.
Maybe try reading about the technology rather than repeating memes
The US government buys fission products from the commercial industry

I’m an ENVS major at major research university in the very heart of the Rockies. Hell yeah
Environment is where it’s at
Also we should nuke china and pissrael

>Also we should nuke china and pissrael
Add new zealand to that list

/thread

Deal buddy
Also all of africa and turkey too .... and mexico .....brazil.........squatamala.......canada...others too

spbp

I mean, they just render a new city uninhabitable every 40 years or so. That's basically nothing!

Thank you Rabbi! Truly you are our greatest ally!

Attached: 1400096565023s.jpg (250x250, 14.82K)

because said people have a double digit IQ and are prone to fear.

We do lol, where are you getting that shit? Nuclear isn't a viable option long term though. We're rapidly running out of fissile material. Nuclear only has a bad rap because of the boomer nuclear waste dilution solution, aka dump it all in the ocean.

kek you actually make a good point agianst nuclear power there. Even makes me doubt as a pro nuclear.

Israel has no nuclear power plants. Really makes you wonder why ZOG nations build so many.

Envs is not a real degree lol. You fags don't even do calc 1
Ecology major here.

>We're rapidly running out of fissile material.
see

I've got a newsflash for you, most of our plants have been run by inbred rednecks since they were built. You only needed a high school diploma to get an operator job at one of these plants back in the day.

Not enough uranium in the ground to power everyones dragon dildos.

Blame that one on the US being scared of durkas and norks using recylcing methods to create weapons. Also its not a cost effective solution. Why not build solar pannels, wind, or geothermal for a much better investment

btw are we any closer to Thorium reactors?
folks have been memeing about LFTRs for at least a decade now

Thorium based reactors.
We use nuclear waste to make thorium usable in molten salt reactors.
The design was completed in the 60s but we ditched it for plutonium based reactors.
They're smaller, safer, and produce a rare nuclear material we use in satellites. I forget the kind but years ago the US had less than 50 pounds of the stuff.

Yes they do retard.
They use them to power the reverse osmosis water plants.

There's enough raw nuclear material in the ocean to power current reactors until the sun engulfs the planet.

Bump

>Why not build solar pannels, wind,

Because fuck china. That's why

spooky. any updates?

dont hold your breath waiting for an answer. i contacted jill stein's campaign in 2012 asking about it and never got a response

Attached: 1583861862869.png (1024x990, 336.61K)

Why not manufacture solar panels in the US? Or buy them from Germany?

THIS IS NOW AN EARTHCHAN THREAD

Attached: 1514689497406.png (850x1295, 2.26M)

Attached: earth_chan__x__by_maximilian_destroyer_dbx25j8-fullview.jpg (1280x1604, 133.47K)

>Why not manufacture solar panels in the US?

>manufacture
>in the US?
Oh wait, you're serious? Let me laugh even harder

youtube.com/watch?v=W3LvZAZ-HV4

Attached: 1514028133816.png (825x908, 113.03K)

>Why don't environmentialists endorse nuclear power?

They do, but in this day and age the loudest and most ignorant representative of any political ideology seems to get to talk the most.

No, but, to be constructive:
The problem with Nuclear Energy is that it has tremendous potential to provide us with massive amounts of clean energy for ages to come, but it is also a power source that demands absolute respect and strict discipline to use. It's a perfectly valid and rational criticism to say, "I'm not confident that x or y is responsible enough to have/use Nuclear Energy". Nuclear Energy isn't something you can just bullshit or ignore: if something goes wrong it will go wrong in a catastrophic fashion.

There's also the fact that the public is largely ignorant about Nuclear Power, but is well aware of the 'cons' to it, but more importantly this: I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a 'race thing', but the people who run energy DEFINITELY don't want people to be independent and they definitely want to make as much fucking money as possible. The energy industry has ALWAYS been about "limited efficiency" and artificial scarcity- they killed the electric car three times before Elon Musk managed to some how make it profitable.... And I think they actually fucking killed the guy making Hydrogen cars?
Green Energy is only getting a pass by them because it's a massive globo-homo job creator and is laughably clumsy so it creates all sorts of opportunities to bullshit.

Attached: 1514754394802.png (901x767, 759.98K)