Chinks caused covid. I don't understand why it's racist to say that out loud...

Chinks caused covid. I don't understand why it's racist to say that out loud. That's like saying it's racist to say niggers kill people. Can facts be racist?

Attached: 87.jpg (599x600, 59.8K)

Apparently in 2020

>Chinks caused covid
didnt Obama sell it to them tho?

Nope, that’s deflection away from the fact that the average chink is a threat to global health

It can be racist to say facts. One thing does not negate the other. Imagine going through the street openly mocking fat people or retards or general "defective" people, imagine crouching next to a homesless guy and telling him he stinks, he reeks of urine and that you have nothing in common with him. You may say facts while also attacking people.

Disclaimer:Death to China!

Everyone was joking about 2020 vision last year but I bet they didn't see this shit coming

Homeless people are not a race. They're a societal blight and shaming them into suicide is a reasonable option for culling their population.

The world needs more Patrick Batemans

>It can be racist to say facts

No, no it can't. Facts are facts they have no bias
>. You may say facts while also attacking people

You can use facts to attack people, yes. This still isn't racism, you're attacking them based on factual evidence

Because it’s racist to say a virus originating from China is a Chinese virus

Well i mispoke, but i was thinking of " discriminating" more than just racist in particular. If i limit my coment to racism it still applies. Imagine walking to a random black guy and say that blacks are thugs sre 13/50 and muh dick. Its an attack. But the idea still applies to any "oppressed groups" beyond race

You're squirrel looks very angry.

MIGA

That’s not an attack, it’s a verbal exchange. Niggers committing 90% of interracial crime is an attack

I disagree. An attack is an attack. Stating a hurtful fact is still an attact. Like calling a fat person "fat". It hurts feelings and diminishes social standing and self-esteem.

actually our supreme court has already ruled on this and stated clearly that merely listing completely objective facts without any editorializing can be a hate crime.

Verbal exchanges are still attacks. Insults are attacks. They hurt feelings, self esteem and social standing.

>PC stands for Personal Computer

Attached: 82149E24-5D7F-45A5-A12C-43BD4008142A.jpg (1000x751, 195.13K)

>Stating a hurtful fact is still an attact.
Not at all. Though I’m not surprised a kike is saying such.

Calling you a satan worshipper isn’t an attack, but you involving the innocent in your satanic plots is. Get it?

Can I say your practice of usury has fucked up the west and the holocaust didn't happen but it should have and will?

So you’re saying the truth can’t be stated because it’s rude?

You trying to limit the speech of those who have to suffer the constant attacks of likes and nuggets is in itself an attack.

You are attacking me right now by trying to minimize my frustration caused by your actions, and trying to guilt and shame me into acting against my best interests

>Chinks
>I don't understand why it's racist

Attached: 1569859964089.jpg (683x817, 137.64K)

It hurts feelings. Do you disagree? Do you think it doesn't hurt feelings?

I dont do usury so i dont feel too bad personally, its not personal enough for my psyche. But other jews get hysterical about that, others get proud.

>Stating a hurtful fact is still an attact.
No
>Like calling a fat person "fat".
While it isn't a nice thing to hear, calling someone fat isn't always a negative.
It's a shitty truth but it's not an attack

If you say someones fat as an insult that could be an attack, but you could also day someone fat out of concern for their health
>self esteem and social standing
Actually being fat effects those, not being mean to a fat person

>Hurts feelings
Boohoo, the truth can hurt your feelings that doesn't make it an attack

I don’t think feelings are a consideration at all. You’re telling me that the ego of those that affect me with their violence or pestilence or satanism is more important that my own health and well-being

The truth can be rude. Should speech be curtailed? IDK, im just saying saying things can be hurtful. Some deserve attacks though, China for instance deserves a full extermination.

I'm annoyed by the idea that hurting someone's feelings determines policy decisions. If it's for the greater good, fuck your feelings.

>Do you think it doesn't hurt feelings?

Yeah because the truth can hurt. That doesn't make it an attack. The idea you can attack someone with fact it's a joke, you're telling them the truth. If it "hurts their feelings" that's on them for being overly sensitive

I didn't say what is more or less important or what should be banned or allowed. I said speech can be an attack, at least it can hurt feelings.

>Some deserve attacks though, China for instance deserves a full extermination.
Yeah and so does Israel

The truth can hurt. Im not saying speech needs to be policed, but it can hurt. I dont think everything that hurts should be banned.

>. I said speech can be an attack

It actually can't.
A punch is an attack, if I punch you, you don't decide whether or not to be insulted or offended

Words can be insults but not attacks. It can't be an attack if youre able to simply ignore it, it can't be an attack if you have the choice to be effected

I see you are a man of culture

>The truth can hurt
Yes I know. I said that in the post.

No one cares what you're saying should be banned or not, kike

The truth isn’t rude. Youre mistaking people addressing the rudeness for the source of the rudeness. It’s rude to be fat, it’s rude to commit crimes, if you abide by such things so much that they become synonymous with you, you are the problem.

You cant choose not to hear an insult someone told you. Insults are attacks, meant to hurt someones feelings. Feelings are important for almost everyone.

>facts
Okay currynigger