Yas Forums says that women belong in the home, raising children
if that is true, why shouldn't women be favored in terms of child custody during divorce proceedings? if women need to stay home because they are better at raising children, why shouldn't they get primary custody when marriages end in divorce?
Women should only be the primary parent, with shared custody, of children until the children are seven years of age.
After that, the father must become the primary parent, with shared custody with the mother.
This is how child rearing had been for the last 10,000 to 15,000 years.
Even the Catholic Church understands this--they even say children are to be educated by their mothers until the age of seven. After that, the Church takes over. They understood how important this was and still is to evolving homo sapiens health and welfare.
Thomas Wright
fuck you, NEETbux don't even pay for my basic proteine needs after paying bills
Kayden Torres
fuck poor people
Colton Rodriguez
Because divorced women don't actually stay home and raise children.
Mason Nelson
this perhaps that is the only envious part about burgerland no ,fuck both of you
It's not much lower, 42-45% of first time marriages end in divorce, the rates go up, but the number of people doing it goes down for remarrying, i.e. 2nd and 3rd marriages are far more likely to fail. It's unclear whether this site's statistics include marriages with one partner being their 1st marriage as "first time marriages" or if both partners must be in order to qualify (which would be my definition)
At any rate, in my experience (32, been with my wife for 11 years, married for 8, 2 kids, house, household income over 120k) most people I see getting divorced:
1. Have a wife who wasn't a virgin when they met 2. Have parents or close friends/family who have gotten divorced (my parents have been together 43 years, her parents 38, our grandparents on all sides never divorced, etc) 3. Married someone with an unsettled major life issue (i.e. not sure if they wanted kids, not sure if they wanted to live in X location or Y location) 4. Have financial issues. The meme is that women will leave you if you make a lot of money. My wife isn't a gold digger, but one of my uncles married one, and if anything they stay more loyal once they're in their late 30s because they realize they don't have the looks to steal his money and still find something as good or better.
I think I'm a pretty good judge at this point of which marriages I see people getting themselves into will or won't last. It's usually pretty simple to tell when two people just won't fucking get along long term but it's also incredible to me the number of people who are IN relationships like that who are completely incapable of telling.
Matthew Taylor
>why shouldn't they get primary custody when marriages end in divorce? Because the children belong to the man and the man's family not the the woman, that's why children get their father's name, like slaves, because they belong to him, not to the mother nor to the Feminist State!
Get this through your effeminate and brainwashed heads!
NO YOU WANT TO MAKE THE KIDS SO THE STATE CAN TAKE THEM FROM YOU.
THEN THE MOTHER HAS TO BECOME CHEAP LABOR INSTEAD OF HOUSE WIFE FOR THE STONKS TO GO UP SENPAI BAKA
IT IS CALLED EQUALITY SPONCERED BY WALMART
Jack Bell
>If women need to stay home because they are better at raising children, why shouldn't they get primary custody when marriages end in divorce?
But they don't stay at home do they? They're allowed to waste their time on a career and doing whatever they want and if their husband dares tell them no then he's a domestic abuser. So no. Under those circumstances women don't deserve fuck all after divorce.
Always the same with you disingenuous fucking tradcuck cunts. >f-f-fucken incels shudn't be mad at [female privilege] cus whamyn shud also [female drawback/responsibility]
Because women are no longer bound by those historical female drawbacks/responsibilities. They're allowed to vote. They're allowed to work. They're allowed to do whatever they want in a relationship and a man can't say no. The tradcucks' attempts to keep women in their place have been a 100 year litany of failure. Whiteknights just kept letting them have more and more rights, and whilst a man with a backbone would have also stripped women of their female privileges at the same time, they just carried on treating them like princesses because 'iz wat real men do' thus ensuring that feminism never had any downsides.
There's only two choices that AREN'T morally repugnant
>1. Women can't vote. Don't work. Obey husband, stay in home, clean, cook etc. In return they're taken care of, provided for, and protected like children. But now that women and their pussy-worshipping simps can vote that is NEVER going to happen (until societal collapse) leaving only: >2. Enforce actual fucking genuine equality. Women should take the bad sides of equality with the good. No more golden parachute divorces. No more lower sentences. Enforced redistribution of wealth-earned-by-pussy. And the cunts can get drafted as well.
But thanks to tradcucks, what we have is an insanely hypocritical equality-buffet where woman just pick and choose all the good parts whilst retaining their female-only privileges.
Hunter Cook
Yas Forums loves to make contradictory statements literally ALL THE TIME.
James Clark
Are you wealthy?
Andrew Wilson
Only perverts WANT custody of children. Let the bitches have em.
Samuel Perry
>NEETbux nice. kys. >memeflag >deus vult pic related - (you)
She can take the kids as long as she doesn't take my money Can't handle being a single mother? Get another man to carry you
Brody Garcia
>are you wealthy? that depends what being wealthy means to you. do i work a corporate job? no. i work construction. always have, always will. i have a girlfriend and 3 children. my family loves me and i love them. perhaps my parents are even proud of me. i unironicallly have Yas Forums and specifically pol to thank for what i have achieved. before coming here back in 12 or whenever it was, i was a drug using left winger with an urge to rebel against the system. i thought living a wild life and having sex with lots of different women was something to be proud of. i have never had a father i dont know if that has something to do with it, but i really really needed an older males guidance in my life and therefore gravitated towards strong criminal types that would take me under their wing so to say. i ended up being redpilled because the arguments that where being made actually started to make sense to me. i tried redpilling my girlfriend with no luck and finally just dumped her when she decided to cheat on me because of muh female freedoms n shit, and i was probably being a bit of a douchebag to her because i couldnt identify myself with her anymore. after the brake up i was in a sense free. i dumped my old loser friends with no goals and aspirations, and started working as a plumber. i started to lift weights and eating healthy, and after about 3 years i found my wife, who didnt share the "extreme" views i did, but who had traditional values if you want to call it that. i would say i am wealthy now that i think about it. fuck poor people, fuck jews and fuck muslims. also, please return to your peeling station.
Hunter Nelson
Oki, I’m happy for you! :)
Leo Nelson
This.
Brandon White
women are favored in terms of custody during divorce proceedings you fucking nitwit. men get the privilege of paying the wife's divorce lawyer which she will make sure to get a jew that wants 100k per court session. men also have the privilege of paying alimony aka whore support and child support aka pay per view. to top that all off men also have the privilege of giving the women half his shit. people wonder why men don't want to get married.