Greenfags BTFO

this. he dislikes trump but he’s been sane enough to point out how ridiculous some of the attacks against his supporters are - a lot of “let them eat cake” statements made by rich, out of touch libs

Attached: FCB1D8D2-EBEE-43D3-A74D-02B4A6ACCB19.png (622x609, 430.07K)

Americans pollute and consume far more than 3rd world nations, sorry bitch ;D

Open question: Why are some people so opposed to the movement of reducing pollution and replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy? If climate change is man made, then it saves humans from a slow painful demise. If climate change isn't man made then we still get the added benefit of a cleaner world and atmosphere.So why are so many people against it?

Attached: ForHarrison.jpg (2048x2048, 468.25K)

>Yellowstone Supervolcano Could Be an Energy Source. But Should It?
>The national park could power the entire continental U.S. with clean energy. Here’s why it remains untapped.
>nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/08/news-yellowstone-supervolcano-geothermal-energy-debate-iceland-hawaii/

Is he powerful enough to defeat the nuclear and fossil titans?

Attached: yellowstone-spring.jpg (2500x1667, 933.69K)

Because it would upset the god of the conservatives, namely the economy.

Jannies are trannies that want to sleep with Michael Moore, so are just protecting their husbando.

Moore was one of the few people who actually went around bonding with people in rust belt states in 2016 and he came out of it predicting a Trump victory. The ivory tower libs ignored him until it was too late

The final act of the documentary is the best, basically the green movement is a bunch of jewish bankers. & fossil fuels are cleaner than biomass

Oil. Some red states and lots of conservative donors would go bankrupt if oil collapsed. It would have been exactly the same with coal if we had today’s plutocratic lobbying system a hundred years ago

I want to fuck that bunny.

Because the green movement champions solar, which results in some terrible pollution itself, and windmills, which are unreliable and produce a fraction of the power needed, as well as deforestation in many cases. If they wanted to shift to nuclear I'd get behind it 100% but I think they're too preoccupied with saving face after they all wanted to ban it a few decades ago

These.

Is it ebcause of all America produces and ships globally, including the 3rd world?

And look at Beijing's air. Look at the River Ganges. Don't tell me high population has been good for them.

The implementation is never in good faith. Shut down competitive markets and use tax dollars to prop up failing systems.

Why did he do it, bros?

Attached: team-america-michael-moore.jpg (453x317, 35.21K)

He's spent too much of his life as a shakedown artist for me to believe that

So now you fags are ready to suck moores dick?
He hasn't done a honest doc ever.

holy based, Michael has redeemed himself

the documentary isn't actually by Moore, he's just promoting it

Libshits bang on about plastic straws from mcdodnalds when china is the one polluting all the oceans with plastic

American pollution is pretty much on par with China despite America having like 10 times less people. Jarring, really.

Conservatives are onboard with nuclear, just not wind and solar.

>get back in your breitbart consumption pens, slav— I mean, based bros

wrong, nuclear is scary and interferes with fossil fuel market share

>b-b-b-but China is doing it!!!!
wow, great argument bud.

Fuck renewable energy. That's actually the smallest part of the equasion.

How do you fix more of nature destroyed for more highways, infrastructure farms, homes, etc.? These same liberal politicians who claim to care about the environment are making tons of money buying and flipping houses in new subdivisions made out of freshly-destroyed nature surrounding all of our cities.

We need to stop growing our cities. We need to cut back the demand for everything so less is needed from nature. But every democrat politician argues growth MUST be maintained because all of our problems can be solved with more populaiton growth.

Bill Gates is right. It's time to sterilize the 3rd world because they're the #1 reason why our cities are growing and chewing up the environment while needing more of everything to be produced.

>Americans pollute and consume far more than 3rd world nations, sorry bitch ;D

Attached: Plastic Waste Disposal.png (3400x2400, 915.55K)

And he still hasn't. It's basically all whitey's fault while making the 3rd world look like victims for shitting out too many poverty-babies.

satan has my full support at pixar

> Why are some people so opposed to the movement of reducing pollution and replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy?

They’re not, the opposition is because the “Green Movement” is all about destroying the West while giving a pass to the 3rd world, which breeds like rats and shits up the entire planet.

Attached: Plastic Waste.png (3400x2400, 645.75K)

Most people ardently against climate change do so for conservative values.
While I'm not against, renewals seem like they would be a bandaid at best. Everything in our lives uses fossil fuels and we aren't going to replace it with electric batteries any time soon. I just wish there was a realistic take on the subject, without idealism and outrage.

Those experts are probably all on Gore’s payroll.

>reducing pollution and replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy
If it was feasible it would have already been done. The main reason this hasn't happened yet, is not because muh evil cartoon villain politicians, but because you can't completely replace fossil fuels only with renewable energy. Insisting this is the case just goes to show you are an uncultured retard. See France vs Germany's energy production compared to their pollution per capita and renewable energy productions for reference.

Look at the comments section of any Breitbart article about nuclear energy and you'll see how much they support nuclear tech.

The only people still shaky about it are a few Democrats, but they're coming around.

>Purposefully killing the planet to own the libs
Epic

It's because he used to be working class and was used to seeing out of touch rich people snub their noses towards the poor. I like the guy.

>dude just google it, trust me
Substantiate your claims or fuck off.

good, they can demand that our elected representatives see things the same way

This. In October 2016 he gave Trump the most moving stump speech he could have given.

youtube.com/watch?v=UDL3Yjl31K8

Is Michael Moore /our guy/ now?

I'm not opposed to it, but you have to realize that renewable energy isn't efficient enough to replace fossil fuels. The net energy you get out of it is very little compared to oil, and cannot support our living standards.
Nuclear also isn't viable because it's reliant on limited resources, same as fossil fuels. The reality is that our society is going to collapse as fossil fuels dwindle.

so moore is LITERALLY a poltard incel nazi micro penis now?

>Nuclear also isn't viable because it's reliant on limited resources
Those resources can last for a very long time, specially with newer generation reactors that are much more efficient. Enough time for renewable to become viable while getting rid of fossil fuels, with is the problem _right fucking now_.

>he came out of it predicting a Trump victory.

did he predict that Hillary's phone would get hacked and the FBI would intervene to throw the election for Trump, who lost the popular vote anyway?

because if we're acting like he's nostradamus and has some special insight into midwestern rage then my standards are more specific for that particular election.

The only green power that works is Dams and Nuclear, and Dams destroy entire ecosystems and Nuclear scares retards, so the left is against both and instead chooses subpar solar and wind which is just as bad for the environment as fossils and kills more wildlife than fossils.

It’s the Libs who don’t give a fuck about killing the planet (via letting the 3rd world shit it up) as long as they can kill Western Civilization, which literally invented the concepts of environmentalism and conservation and have done the most to implement green tech.

The “Green Movement” is just cover for attacking the West, literally EVERY program they suggest involves draconian measurers forced on Western nations while letting the rest of the plant off the hook.

If every American and European disappeared tomorrow, the planet would STILL go to shit as the China, India, Mexico will happily burn the planet to a cinder without a second thought.

dam accidents have killed hundreds of thousands of people in single events, but nobody cares

fossil fuels aren't "efficient". they're merely based on consuming energy stored by plants millions of years ago.

both the pro and anti-fossil fuel arguments are built over a fucking abyss. your need to act like one side is "right" is just as pathetic as any of the blind eco zealots.

now the phone was hacked, i thought it was the entire ellection

You could've asked nicely.

Attached: 1579893848615.png (686x1073, 82.15K)

>Nuclear also isn't viable because it's reliant on limited resources
absolutely brainlet response

Attached: 1560973109361.png (619x815, 67.73K)

But you're going to run out of fuel in 400,000 years. You have to think ahead.

> If climate change is man made, then it saves humans from a slow painful demise.
Climate change is beneficial for most developed countries.

Attached: 1560256785347.jpg (640x1007, 214.87K)

>dam accidents have killed hundreds of thousands of people in single events

aaaaand now I know this is a fucking shill thread. it was the 1975 Banqiao Reservoir Dam Failure in FUCKING SAFETY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD, CHINA.

the idea that there's cunts on Yas Forums who are appraised of dam safety, and are presenting the one (1) dam catastrophe to keep more than a few thousand people as representative, proves you have are advertizers.

I was going to watch the movie but now I'll intentionally spread bad word of mouth about it. fuck you.

>wanting to blame INDIA of all countries
Typical Ameritard

Attached: 1200px-CO2_emissions_per_capita,_2017_(Our_World_in_Data).svg.png (1200x847, 202.98K)

There's more room to improve on the democrat side.

Attached: 1578203752776.png (649x1080, 529.54K)

>Nuclear also isn't viable because it's reliant on limited resources, same as fossil fuels. The reality is that our society is going to collapse as fossil fuels dwindle.

KEK, we have a whole continent full of coal laying just on the ground and dozens of mega oil fields that are untapped.

Also plenty of nuclear and solar power in space.

Reminder that you cannot be an environmentalist and anti-nuclear at the same time. It's either coal or nuclear, there is no compromise.

Wtf are those robots in the top pic?

>b-but what about total emissions
You have almost 400 million people, you fucking retard. So obviously your total emissions are STILL ABOVE INDIA if you have the highest pollution per capita when you happen to be one of the most populated countries on earth on top of that. Literally just nuke China and America. No need to shift blame to but what about muh third world.

KYS

Attached: annual-co2-emissions-per-country.png (832x572, 43.03K)

>Nuclear also isn't viable because it's reliant on limited resources, same as fossil fuels.

Breeder reactors produce more fuel than they consume and there's plentiful U238 on Earth.

Attached: Pubreed.png (601x280, 73.72K)

>nooooooooooooooo you can't cite an accident that actually killed hundreds of thousands of people nooooooooooooooooo
cringe

b-b-b-but muh proliferation

Nuclear is more expensive than wind or solar. This is literally the only thing that matters and why it won't win out. Fusion reactors are reddit popsci onions bait and will never amount to anything.

Based

Oh noooo it's a movie with content we don't approve of, so we move it to Yas Forums.
Fuck jannies.

When there are no enemies they start cannibalizing their own

Isn't this cherry picking the exact same argument that's used so often against nuclear energy? The safest means of energy production by deaths per twh by a long shot.

What.
What
What
What
Nuclear is the cheapest of all of them wtf

>Nuclear is more expensive than wind or solar
Why is it the cheapest option then? We buy energy from france for cheap, and they use mostly nuclear reactors. And that's despite green energy being subsidized right left and center.

There's more to environmentalism than emissions.

Attached: 1558248229494.jpg (1200x749, 223.61K)