I was watching JRE last night with Tim Pool and they both agreed that Michelle Obama would be the best president. I have to agree. I mean, she's black, she's a woman and third thing.
So would you vote for Obama 2.0?
Would she be a good president or the best president?
We don't need trannies in the White House.
She said she'd never run for president. A shame because she'd win. Her presidency would be on par with her husband's. Smooth sailing, beloved by many, but little progress.
I don’t think berni bros would be happy with that, whatever happened to having the runner up in the place of the drop out?
Presidential.
What would make her a good president exactly? The only time I know she did was fuck up school lunches/vending machines.
>she
fpbp
we don't need trannies in the White House.
and think about that nomenclature for a moment.
White
House
who do you think belongs there?
Hell, it took Trump the first 3 years of being there to get the smell of menthol cigarettes and fried food out. Not to mention the random spots in the carpet of purple drank and Kool Aid.
She was disbarred for some shady shit
no she didn't
> I have to agree. I mean, she's black, she's a woman and third thing.
So would you vote for Obama 2.0?
Please cut yourself user there is no use for you
Yes she did, he surrendered her license as part of a plea deal and not bring charges in 1993
She's as educated and accomplished in academia and her career as her husband is before they got into politics. She and her husband are established elites (for lack of a better word). World leaders love and respect them. Our standing in world politics would be instantly restored. The country would stabilize, our economy would recover, we'd start taking steps forward to combating climate change and protecting our coastal cities, but as I mentioned in my previous reply we'd be stagnant on any progress when it comes to federal welfare for the country, mostly due to GOP obstruction, so no universal health care or changes to education. The biggest benefit of her as president would be peace of mind, the Obama's generate no real controversy.
All though she/he was born here she/he moved away. She's gotta be a resident for awhile before she/he is eligible. And she/he loves this country so much she/he doesn't claim United States citizenship.
And I don't think Catholics will be voting for shim. What are the odds. Not a word about how bad it was to watch it burn.
I'd think about voting for her if she told the truth about her penis.
Becoming Michelle Obama
by Michael LaVaughn Robinson
They killed Joan Rivers over this.
>she
Nigger
I've never seen a single "reputable" source supporting this. I'm not saying some shit like CNN, just something that isn't a literally who tinfoil publication.
Every single source I've found has said her and her husband gave up their licenses voluntarily as they were no longer practicing.
I would certainly appreciate a source, I hate Michelle Obama and everyone's worship of her, but there doesn't seem to be anything backing up your claim.
Michelle Obama has done nothing, and i dont mean this in some sort of racist shit way. she literally fucks the president of the united states. she is in no way qualified to deal with anything.
its like shit with Zuckerbergs wife having a foundation named after her, when her claim to fame was blowing a nerd in a bathroom stall.
No, she would not be a good president or the best president
>I was watching JRE last night with Tim Pool and they both agreed
Imagine thinking either one has a shred of political intelligence
Imagine even watching a show featuring that pair and no one else
Kek
Fucking the president shouldn't be a qualification for a female president.
>Smooth sailing, beloved by many, but little progress.
Obama made no progress, only massive regression.
This anti white, pro black victimhood shit went thru the roof starting 2011
And why would Barak be willing to let anyone surpass his incredible legacy?
>She and her husband are established elites (for lack of a better word).
Imagine thinking this is a qualification rather than a problem
>World leaders love and respect them.
KEK
stopped reading right there
>only massive regression.
Absolutely not true and you know it. Or maybe you're too young to remember what it was like under Bush during his last 4 years and you truly don't know.
>she
>The country would stabilize, our economy would recover, we'd start taking steps forward to combating climate change
3 in a row in one sentence. EXCELLENT late as a braindead NPC
>federal welfare and universal health care or changes to education would be progress.
Holy shit you are amazing at this larp
> The biggest benefit of her as president would be peace of mind, the Obama's generate no real controversy.
My sides
Well done m8
Sources are sealed, since the charges never materialized they can claim what ever they want. One thing i can say is that the crime wasn’t that big, white hat stuff, haven’t you wondered why a lawyer surrenders his license after 5 years of obtaining it? It wasn’t because of the money, its 300 dlls annually.
>Absolutely not true and you know it.
Not an argument
Try again and this time support your retardedness with (an attempt at) facts.
Its weird that Democrat first ladies get such good press that people think they would be decent leaders.
I've known two lawyers who gave up their licenses for a time because they weren't practicing and they can get them back later
there is an issue with making claims and when asked to present a source you just say "sources are sealed, trust me bro".
even if it's true it can't be verified and it makes people who repeat it look like absolute retards with zero credibility.
The PRC is waging information warfare against the GOP and USA in support of DNC given that none of their candidates proved popular. All of this is an effort to restore the treason that was happening at the behest of China under the Obama-Biden administration.
Europeans depend heavily on Russian oil / gas. They do not like Russia having a lot of leverage over them in this way. Poland / Ukraine are the eastern border of Europe as far as Western Europeans are concerned, so they want NATO running a defensive corridor there.
The Middle East primarily sells oil / gas to China. They do not have pipeline access to Europe, and the United States blocks pipeline access to China via Afghanistan (which we occupy, for this exact reason).
In the middle of the Obama regime, they toppled Egypt / Libya, specifically by supporting rebels in eastern Libya. You probably don't know this, but eastern Libya is the highest per capita recruiting grounds for al-Qaeda anywhere in the world. They are the ones who were largely responsible for building IEDs that killed most of our troops in Iraq. Lots and lots of American blood on their hands. These are the people Obama supported against Gaddafi however.
Why? Libyan weapons stockpiles were shipped to Syria. The plan was to overthrow Syria and then Turkey. The intention here was to open a pipeline path from Saudi Arabia to Europe. The easiest way to do this is Jordan / western Iraq > Syria > Turkey > Europe
The fallout of such a pipeline opening up goes like this: Saudi energy becomes cheaper than Russian (easier to extract than Russian, but comparable delivery prices once a pipeline is available from Saudi Arabia to Europe). Europe switches to ME energy. Russia then has to switch to selling to China. Afghanistan is no longer valuable real estate in controlling Chinese energy sovereignty. The West has no controllable territory between Russia and China to cut supplies > China obtains effective energy independence, superpower status