Continuation of Ascended Masters or Philosophy/Religion or whatever.
Continuation of >>255337390
Robert Martin
Anthony Cruz
is it all just a game bros? what are the cheat codes?
Joseph Howard
Hard work.
Kevin Robinson
According to hermetic literature Pharoah means white skinned one. Also, the secret of the rose in rosacrucianism is that the rose is symbolic of a portal...a jump gate of you will. Because apparently they look like flowers opening when they open
Luis Hernandez
As for the earlier post you referred me to, I agree with it. Concerning your comments on the Torah and Hermeticism and the Zohar, I cannot comment because that is outside my knowledge.
Samuel Richardson
We live in a mental universe.
nature.com
>I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness.
Max Planck
>Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.
Neils Bohr
>Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. Consciousness is absolutely fundamental.
Erwin Schrödinger
All of reality exists within one universal consciousness. God thinks the world into existence.
>And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.
Exodus 3:14
>Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
John 8:58
>I think, therefore I am.
René Descartes
>The Mind, then, is not separated off from God’s essentiality, but is united unto it, as light to sun.
Hermes Trismegistus
The Son of God is the Logos, REASON, Ordo ab Chao
>In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
>The same was in the beginning with God.
>All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
>In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
John 1:1-4
>That Light, He said, am I, thy God, Mind, prior to Moist Nature which appeared from Darkness; the Light-Word (Logos) that appeared from Mind is Son of God.
>With Reason (Logos), not with hands, did the World-maker make the universal World
Hermes
The Son (Logos) is knowable
>But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name
John 1:11
>For the LORD gives wisdom, and from his mouth come knowledge and understanding.
Proverbs 2:6
>As many then as understood the Herald’s tidings and doused themselves in Mind, became partakers in the Gnosis; and when they had “received the Mind” they were made “perfect men.”
>O’er whatsoever souls the Mind doth, then, preside, to these it showeth its own light
Hermes
Aaron Turner
pic related from the last thread
what do you think of the mormons?
Gabriel Morales
I meant to ask you that question actually
Carter Scott
Seeing how deep into the history and myths you are, I suggest reading the actual Corpus Hermeticum when you find the time to. If not for enlightenment (academic or spiritual), then for reading pleasure. It’s neat to see what the great mystical tradition actually taught, and Hermes spelled it out quite plainly (very direct, very light on allegory compared to most other masters).
Joseph Bell
>not having a gameshark you've plugged into your neurolink
It's like you want to fail
Jonathan Jackson
I believe Jesus was the metaphorical/spiritual "son" of the True God in the sense that he taught pure truth, but not the physical son of any god. His body was mortal.
How do you misinterpret:
>John 1:1
>“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
Your book:
>NOG
>1 In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was already with God in the beginning.
Aaron Bell
>pic related from the last thread
If that is what we have gathered from the last thread then why bother to continue?
Christopher Jackson
About Mormonism? I would asses it on two levels. Politically, I think it is good because they are generally moral people and are one of the few white groups with a positive birthrate. On the other hand, they are incredibly philo-semitic and pro-Israel, which I think is bad.
On a religious or doctrinal level I think they are simply wrong, though they have some interesting ideas. I do believe that the Phoenicians probably reached the New World long ago, but the specific narrative that Mormonism gives for this seems false.
Which specific texts? I've read some of them, but not very deeply. I have a relatively deep knowledge about certain topics, but I read the Hermes Trismegistus stuff long ago and haven't integrated it with what I know now.
You and I were going back and forth on the Deluge, right? We might disagree on particulars, but I suspect we are on the same page. Or a similar one.
Eli Gray
>mormons
High level freemason Joseph was. Their temple proceedings have people swear wearing fig leaves to satan (in literal sense).
They are an acceptable 'christ' religion to the cabal which mimics gnostics 'becoming Gods'. They actually do all think they will become gods.
Jose Long
Where can I read this?
William Taylor
Aww fuck wasted
Justin Myers
>About Mormonism?
>Politically
That's it. It was a movement to establish a national (US) religion based, loosely, around christian freemasonry. Ask a Mormon about freemasonry. It's fun.
Tyler Campbell
It's inaccurate to say that I support the NOG version more than others. Please see my response about this here: I believe that the NT has been edited by Jews in various ways. For example, Luke and Matthew were both written for political reasons and are elaborations of Mark. Luke and Matthew contain genealogies for Jesus that contradict one another and cannot be reconciled. This is proof that at least some writings are edited and false. The question then becomes which ones and how extensive the edits were. If you're the one I responded to in last thread I had wanted to elaborate on Cronus/El Yahweh/Poseidon mortal seduction comments but thread was dying, so:
(1907) James George Frazer - Adonis, Attis, Osiris
Page 70 Footnote 6
A trace of a similar belief perhaps survives in the narratives of Genesis XXXI and Judges XIII where barren women are represented as conceiving children after the visit of God, or of an angel of God, in the likeness of a man.
(1966) Peter Walcot - Hesiod and the Near East
Page 70
The evidence which supports such a theory has been collected and discussed by Widengren, who refers to the Genesis story of how a son came to be born to Abraham and Sarah, pointing out that the name Sarah is generally thought to be the same as the Akkadian word for queen or princess, while, when Yahweh is said to visit Sarah, it is possible that the word 'visit' here has a sexual connotation.
1/2
Elijah Bell
Josiah Campbell
Checked. The Emeral Tablets of Thoth and The Hermetica. Simply go to Thehiddenrecords dot com to see for yourself the secret of portals. It has to do with Orion and the leg of the bull star symbology. You'll see. Consider yourself initiated once you familiarize yourself with Wayne Hershels work. He is my guru. A true master
Brayden Carter
(1999) Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible
Giants - G. Mussies
A god whose sons marry mortal women on earth, could, of course, by opponents of Judaism easily be taken to refer to no one else than Cronus, whose sons Zeus and Poseidon had a reputation for having fathered many earthlings, especially ancestors of royal dynasties, such as Heracles the son of Zeus from whom the Macedonian kings claimed descent (Plutarch, Alexander 2,1). Probably in order to prevent such interpretations, the expression 'the sons of God' was replaced by 'the angels of God' in a number of manuscripts of the LXX and also by Philo of Alexandria.
Josiah Cooper
>It has to do with Orion
Are you Sirius?
Christian Long
>And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:14
The way I see it, the Son of God is a metaphysical concept: the universal Logos, the intellect that gives form to formless matter and imbues the world with the energy of the Father (Mind fundamental, the silent Root). The Logos is personally knowable (Gnosis), in that those ‘enlightened’ men are piloted by the cosmic Logos rather than their egos or lusts.
When the Word was made flesh, the consciousness that is the Universe itself incarnated in the body of Jesus. Jesus then is both man and God; when He spoke, He spoke not for himself (his body, his ego), He spoke for God. His body was the fleshy vessel of the cosmic Logos. We shouldn’t worship his earthly form as an idol of God. We should strive to know God as He exists eternally, in spirit.
Owen Perez
I use the GRS Mead translation of the complete Corpus
You should find the language quite familiar, it’s been Hellenized
gnosis.org
Samuel Smith
>Reposting this
That was only supposed to be for the first post, why does it keep auto-filling the name box for me
Evan Davis
I use this site all the time for the Apocryphon of John and the Gospel of Thomas and others. Didn't realize it also had these texts. I have a very long reading list right now but I will prioritize these.
Ryan Bailey
>It's inaccurate to say that I support the NOG version more than others.
Fair
>If you're the one I responded to in last thread I had wanted to elaborate on Cronus/El
Not me, no comment and knowledge on that.
>In Genesis, it describes the Sons of El having sex with mortal women. El is Cronus. This is a reference to Zeus and Poseidon banging mortals and having kids - that is to the Greek demigods. In the oldest layers of myth, Yahweh was a son of El too, and had mortal children. So that myth was applied to Jesus by Yahwists.
Have you read the Testament of Solomn? More indicative that the Greek and Roman mythology borrowed from such IMO, but I am not married to that.
Hudson Miller
>
Hopefully someone can help me here.
>get told to be flawless or die and suffer eternal torture
>but be born flawed
>even if you are sinless you inherit sins from previous generations
>can only be flawless through absolute worship
>in a world where demons are literally out to get you to obtain your worship and your soul
hmmm. I get it I am flawed, but this whole plan seems awfully fishy. My whole point is that maybe instead of aiming for the greatest you should slowly work your way up through careful actions and learning. Growing out of sin.
Parker Walker
Liam Hill
ZZslZTarrent 4k: Upscaled with AI, mossad endtech work: mega.nz
Jayden Morgan
OP I need to sleep now. It was nice chatting with you. I’ll leave you with my reading list:
>Wholeness and the Implicate Order
>Meditations on the Tarot
>Initiation into Hermetics
>The Perfect Matrimony
>Eros and the Mystery of Love
>The Red Book, and anything Jung
>A New Model of the Universe
>Introduction to Magic (Evola)
And I’m taking recommendations
Leo Cruz
I've read this one.
Kayden Hall
Nice list.
Anyone have a list from last thread? I have a few notes to share.
Leo Kelly
>Testament of Solomn
I think I skimmed it once but I don't have a detailed memory of it. The truth is that "Greek" and "Hebrew" mythology are actually the same thing and should both properly be called "Phoenician mythology". The Indo-European Greeks who invaded Greece around the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC conquered the natives, who in my view were Western Semites, but the myths we know of them from the classical period mostly came from those that were conquered. Except Zeus, the Indo-Europeans brought him and imposed him as the head of the pantheon they found. For El = Saturn = Cronus, see (1997) Cyrus Herzl Gordon - The Bible and the Ancient Near East
Page 95
For all these chronological, geographical, and historical reasons, it is not surprising that early Greek and Hebrew literatures - far from belonging to different watertight compartments - are related branches of one and the same ancient East Mediterranean complex of literatures.
(2006) Bruce Louden - The Iliad Structure, Myth, and Meaning
Page 6
I argue, on the basis of the parallels adduced in chapters 5, 6, and 7, that Homeric epic learned its specific narrative vehicles from Near Eastern, especially West Semitic, cultures.
In my view we are born with the choice between good and evil, not "living in evil" as Catholics believe. We are meant to choose good and to reach moral perfection through a series of rebirths. You aren't going to hell if you are still imperfect at the end of this incarnation. Just my take.
Definitely read Plato's Apology, Crito, and Phaedo if you haven't. Timaeus also. And read the Dhammapada. But most of what I could recommend is academic and may or may not be relevant to your interests. The Origins of Biblical Monotheism is good. Cult of Molek too. Thanks for reccs, saved, and sleep well.