Is environmentalism redpilled?
Is environmentalism redpilled?
Jeremiah Stewart
Other urls found in this thread:
bitchute.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Lincoln Garcia
Remove invasive species now.
Leo Gray
You want to make a difference?
Go pick up trash.
William Phillips
>virgin old-growth forest
Completely misleading. There is more tree coverage on the surface of the earth now than there was 100 years ago.
Conservation and proper land stewardship is redpilled, environmentalism is a lunatic anti-human cult full of obnoxious mentals that need to fuck right off.
Mason Jones
Both are true
Cameron Brown
fucking this
Cooper Mitchell
good question. Environmentalists that are promoted in the United States are often backed by the CIA and the Rockefellers-- and those people are unironically Malthusian eugenicists. I think that stuff is totally fucked up, but a lot of people on Yas Forums seem to love eugenics unironically. So you can have your nationalist socialist paradise, but only on the terms that Soros, the Rockefellers, the CIA, and all of the SJW liberals they are brainwashing want to have it.
Elijah Ross
>Completely misleading
> There is more tree coverage on the surface of the earth now than there was 100 years ago.
Congratulations, you are retarded.
Virgin Old Growth forest is undisturbed forests. Not stands of tulip poplar that grew up 100 years ago. Look at any picture in American from 100+ years ago and most of the trees are gone. Most forests are new
Camden Roberts
It’s not misleading, it says right there what is shown in the picures. Old forests are not the same as planted forests. The eco systems never recover and many species disappear because they lose their home. Besides these modern nu-forets have no life or soul. Pic related is an example
Owen Collins
>Conservation and proper land stewardship is redpilled, environmentalism is a lunatic anti-human cult full of obnoxious mentals that need to fuck right off
Fucking this.
bitchute.com
youtube.com