TRUMP REALLY FUCKED THIS ONE UP
BREAKING: BRETT KAVANAUGH UPLOAD NEW YORK GUN CONTROL LAWS
It just proves that Trump picked non-partisan justices and that all the others are party representatives rather than impartial justices.
Uploads? Try again and calm down
Kavanaugh wrote the Patriot Act. He is a pile of shit, which is why they invented his clown show hearings about nonsense. You're all so fucking dumb you just pay attention to the blinking lights like retards.
An user predicted that Trump would end up replacing 8 of the 9 justices before it’s all over.
They should be tried for sedition then executed. Shall not be infringed. Trump is too weak.
Oh no it's really over for trump this time I can't wait to be rid of that person in January of 2025
Oh goodie. Name a single person he's hired that isn't trash
Steve Bannon
Gorsuch
Imagine crying in front of the public to get your job.
That’s all you need to know about Kavanaugh the bitch. Another neocon piece of shit.
>tfw you're a spineless cuckservative but a bullshit rape claim shields you from any scrutiny from your "base"
Who was promptly fired upon realising he was a useful and competent strategist.
Flynn
Lmao vote harder you subhuman trumptards
don't move goalposts fren
They declared it moot because the law which the case was based on has been changed since the trial began. They're just sending it back to the lower courts for now.
They didn't uphold New York's gun law.
New York had realized they were going to lose, and so they tactically repealed that section of their gun law so they could argue that the case was moot. They didn't want a precedent established, so they gave in on the technical point raised by this case.
Unfortunately this is not an uncommon maneuver on the part of state governments, and there is case law on both sides regarding whether they should be allowed to get away with it. On this particular case, Kavanaugh accepted the state government's argument that the case had become moot. Not the best outcome, but certainly not "upholding" the gun control law.
I don't expect you to understand any of this because you are clearly retarded.
Gorschic was far right judge
Kavenaugh was moderate which was crazy why they tried to villify him as a baby rapist or whatever
The bill of rights are inherent rights. They are god given, not granted. No agency, no body established by men, and no person can infringe upon these rights.
They may establish laws which restrict the exercise of these rights, but by doing so they become enemy combatants. At that point, it is up to an individual to live as if they are under occupation by a hostile force which seeks to enslave them, or to resist.
Always remember that anybody who attempts to subvert your inherent rights is an enemy.
And Kavanaugh said states are not adhering to Heller and McDonald and need to be addressed soon.
kill enough of those enforcing it and the law is moot your move kavakhunt
>anybody who attempts to subvert your inherent rights is an enemy
*buys recreational nuke*
Nothin personal, kid
What case did they dismiss user? Your OP skills need work.
foxnews.com
They didn't "upload" anything, they dismissed the case because it was no longer relevant since New York retracted the law.
Pompeo
Here it be:
supremecourt.gov
Read the 30 page dissent and discuss, you fabulous legatards.
You can tell Flynn is good because they went against him so hard. Hopefully he gets his plea withdrawn soon. I’d live to see him back in action but it may be too late.
Stephen Miller
If that's the reason, it sucks to kick it out but it was probably the right move... Mootness doctrine and prohibition against advisory opinions, etc. More important to adhere to the process than it is to try to engineer a result. The process is designed to reach the right result, even if that doesn't always happen.
Looks like the issue was justiciability.
The dissent felt it was not `moot'.
"Under the Constitution, our authority is
limited to deciding actual cases or controversies, and if this
were no longer a live controversy—that is, if it were now
moot—we would be compelled to dismiss. But if a case is
on our docket and we have jurisdiction, we have an obligation to decide it."
Looks like the dissent is right, Kavanaugh is wrong. Roberts--no surprises here.
I'm late to the party, but I'm a NYfaggot who remembers funs back in the 2000s. Everything got illegal in the past ten years. What's going on here? Did Kavanaugh say that NY's laws are fine?
Finally people who arent retards
Moot =/= uphold
This.
Dog and pony show to get retards to root for Kavanaugh.
Losing is not a virtue.
It was too late far before we were ever born user
The goal now is crash the shitshow with no survivors
Agreed, but it's bullshit what NYC did. I believe they also repealed their law banning conversion therapy (talk therapy, not Mike Pence style therapy) because it was a clear violation of the First Amendment and they knew that. Pretty shitty. They are showing their hand. Once they think they have their court they will pass all these laws that they know are illegal because the court will cover them.
His mexican cleaning staff. Happy now, purple haired warrior?
uploads...wtf...
nobody is gonna do nothing... with guns right now. everybody is unemployed and pissed you think they want to take guns right now?
with ppl freaking out and food getting hard to find any money being tight. I bet hunting season will start early
>a bullshit rape claim shields you from any scrutiny from your "base"
Hello Pot, my name is Tara
>Name a single person he's hired that isn't trash
milkvanka
NY caved because they knew they would lose. Sounds like the process worked. I'm sure there's already another case being set up (if not already winding its way through the lower courts), to keep the 2nd amendment fight up. There are entire industries, on both sides of the politics, that have sprung up around these disputes. Conservatives were a little late to the game, but they're engaged now, and have matured their apparatus in the last ten to 20 years.
he is afwul he tried to control right wing movements in europe likely he got btfo and now he is being payed by a chinese billionaire who was charged with corruption and runaway and now is funding anti-chinese propaganda
When are they taking the 50 first amendment cases?
dismissing moot cases is a cop out. they should have forced NY to come and defend the original law or admit it was unconstitutional.
pretty much this. Legal gamesmanship.