Collective punishment is banned because it WORKS

This is the sort of tactic the Jew fears.

If you will not reveal which of your group is responsible then there is no choice but to punish all of you.

This will achieve something, either the person will tell you it was them to save the others, or the others will tell you who it was to save themselves.

If they choose to conspire and not tell then not only do they all deserve punishment anyway but whoever it was is getting punished as well if you weren't able to identify who exactly it was.

Attached: marcus_crassus_spartacus_1960.jpg (495x459, 55.77K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uAeuCmj4EsI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Or no one knows who did it and you foment sedition by giving them a reason to hate you through unjust behavior.

>If you will not reveal which of your group is responsible then there is no choice but to punish all of you.
and what gives you the right to punish?

What gives the state the right to punish?

Libertarians ask the dumbest question, I swear.

>He thinks rights exist
Who wants to tell him?

>no one knows who did it
No the person who did it knows and everyone will be on the look out for it from there on

Not only that but they will actively discourage the rest of their group from doing the same act in fear of further punishment.

I'm sorry but all I see Jews do these days is do some horrific act (gang-rape or murder) and then flee back to Israel where they will pretty much escape any real punishment.

They really don't like being punished for their actions.

We had the right to punish the very moment our sovereignty began to be deliberately eroded from those parasites.

Collective punishment works. I have no real problem with it and that's why we have conspirator and accomplice charges. However if it's against an enemy oppressor the only answer to their question should be silence or confusion.

Of course it works. Does not make it right. Only from moral corruption does such wickedness come. It will obviously be used by parasites against righteous men. Since it stems from a collectivist lens, and thus will be used by and for the parasite.

One thousand years from now does collective genocide against a largely malicious state actor have any real negative consequences?

I AM SPARTACUS

Attached: images (1).jpg (209x241, 10.65K)

Great movie. Classic who dunnit
>Inb4 Reddit posting

Yeah, unfortunately though charges are very weak.

A few years in a 5 star hotel Jail with quality meals for covering something up is not exactly punishment in my eyes and they'll be laughing.

As with anything it might not be right majority of the time but there are cases where it is necessary. Sometimes you need to stop thinking about whether it's right or wrong if it helps prevent bad in the long run.

I agree with you and any patriot would just make things more quick to Judgement.

youtube.com/watch?v=uAeuCmj4EsI

Attached: 1581675186203.jpg (1354x1053, 553.08K)

Bootlicker

But Ford prision system, i mean what we call highschool teaches and program us to reject snitches under a collective punishment treat, even media glorify lying rather than telling ghe true.

decimation being used was rarely thought, generally the mere mention of it would make legionaries calm the fuck down

>OP wants to actually get rid of bootlickers by punishing them
>"y-y-you're a bootlicker!"

Collective punishment should be used on the police and other government branch every time they do something bad.

Not if half your platoon is nigs who steal everything not bolted down. Ive been punished tens of times and never commited a crime.

Police and Military has extreme authority and obidience. If the high rank doesnt talk and doesnt want you to talk, you simple shut up.

This is reasonable, you dont want a thinker in battle, just a mindless soldier who follows the orders.

WhAt giVeS tHe StAtE tHe RiGhT tO pUniSh

Found the lolberg.

I don't want mindless zogbots telling me what to do without questioning things.

In which case they should all be killed and their higher ups.

It's a good question worth asking, they only have any authority because people give it to them.

However that is beginning to fade luckily now that people are questioning things more.

I don't want to be punished because some nigger in my neighborhood stole a bike. Fuck you.

You're not a nigger though so you would be spared.

>Italians
>Not niggers

Kek

All junior enlisted are equally nigs. If somebody stoke a bike, the platoon stole a bike.

Collective punishment isn't enough though. An egregious fuck-up on the scale of the Paki rape gang coverup warrants the next step of punishment; to find every living politician who sat in parliament since the 70’s until now and hang them. Until this happens, parliament exists in shame and has no competency or public trust.

If anything, the hanging of politicians should be within the remit of the Crown. The Crown should exist to protect the people from a corrupt political class, and they have failed miserably. George VI would’ve sorted them out proper.

that's the same as saying
> australians
> not abos

Attached: skintone.jpg (1024x419, 84.18K)

>Right to punish

Kek. Nice bait

Ask the carthiginians

How the paki rape gang cover up should be dealth with:

PURGE all pakis and muslims
Kill all police in that area
Kill all politicians involved (so basically all)